similar to: SEC: UNCLASSIFIED:- 10 VLANS, 10 Master browsers, 1 PC

I think I may have fixed my memory leaks, and it may be that it was nothing to do with xen... the machine has been up for 10 days now which is the longest it has lasted in quite a while. I changed the way the bridges and vlans worked together, previously I had it configured thus: trunk = renamed Ethernet interface br0 = bridge of trunk and any domU I wanted on vlan1 br0.2 = vlan 2 on trunk br1 =

Hi all, I have been troubled with the traffic flow on the XCP 1.6 and XCP 0.5. - I have 4 servers in VLAN2 on port b12,b13,b14,b15 (these servers work on a XCP 0.5) - on port a3 have have mirrort al ports from a1,a2,a4-b24 - have a other HP server with XCP1.6 with (Debian 6.0.6 as host) and install snort. this has 2 eth carts in it. Eth0 is plugt in the VLAN2 network and

Hello all, I need a virtual firewall/router solution. I''m thinking of a netscreen 1000 but I want to know if it can be done in Linux. Here is my idea: 1 Linux box 2 GigE interfaces 1 interface setup with a public IP address ($PUBIP) 1 interface setup with 802.1q VLAN trunking with 100 vlans assigned ($VLAN1-$VLAN100) a /25 subnet routed to $PUBIP from my core routers All $VLAN

On 5/23/24 22:58, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Can you post your smb.conf. Actually no, as I don't have *one* smb.conf. I'll add three of them (the last three were I had this problem) at the end of this email. As you can see they are not exactly identical. > Have you used any of our fallback VFS modules instead of xattrs? I'd say not, but see the smb.confs. > (This would

Hey guys, I have a question regarding shorewall and vrf functionality. I have shorewall 3.4.8 and kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r8 I have tried to use iproute2 (ip route and ip rule) to establish multiple routing tables. The biggest problem seems to be, that I cannot add interfaces such as vlan interfaces to the routing table. My target is that linux takes attention of on which vlan interface

<I apologize if this arrives twice... I sent it first from an non-subscribed address, don't know if that'll get to the list or not --JJ> Hi folks, I have an implementation question regarding bridging on a linux box between a catalyst trunk port and a cisco 26something w/802.1q subinterfaces. So right now, there's no vlan trunking going on on the link my bridging firewall sits

On Fri, 24 May 2024 23:38:03 +0200 Andrea Venturoli via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 5/23/24 22:58, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > Can you post your smb.conf. > > Actually no, as I don't have *one* smb.conf. > I'll add three of them (the last three were I had this problem) at > the end of this email. > As you can see they are not exactly

OK, thanks again for all your help. I have resolved this, finally. The problem was that I configured VLAN 48 as the native VLAN on the trunk port.That was a mistake as apparently the native VLAN is the one where Cisco does not bother to tag packets. For now I set the native VLAN to VLAN 1 and that works. Cheers, Boris. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at

I''m trying to implement simple untagged vlans on our switch and have misconfigured something.. ISP gw is on the default vlan1 (untagged) Router eth1 is setup on the switch with default vlan1 and member of vlan4. eth0 is default vlan4 which connects to the clients that are all default members of vlan4 eth0 is x.x.x.86/28 This is what clients are connecting to as their gw.. (no

I'm looking for some information regarding the interaction of KVM, VLANs, firewalld, and the kernel's forwarding configuration. I would appreciate input especially from anyone already running a similar configuration in production. In short, I'm trying to figure out if a current configuration is inadvertently opening up traffic across network segments. On earlier versions of CentOS

I''m playing around with VLAN''s and I have a VLAN capable (layer 2) smart switch. I see a steady stream of martians in the logfile if I have the routefilter option set on the loc zone interfaces in /etc/shorewall/interfaces. I have two interfaces in the loc zone, eth1 and vlan2 respectively. vlan2 is an 802.1q trunk going towards the switch. Is this the expected behavior in

re can somebody tell me what am I doing wrong (at this late night hour), because vlan are not getting bridged at all. ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth1 ifconfig br0 up vconfig add br0 X vconfig add br0 Y X = vlan-ID (example: 222) Y = vlan ID (example: 223) # brctl show bridge name bridge

On 03/20/2016 08:51 PM, Devin Reade wrote: > In a CentOS 7 test HA cluster I'm building I want both traditional > services running on the cluster and VMs running on both nodes On a purely subjective note: I think that's a bad design. One of the primary benefits of virtualization and other containers is isolating the applications you run from the base OS. Putting services other

--On Monday, March 21, 2016 08:57:59 AM -0700 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/20/2016 08:51 PM, Devin Reade wrote: >> In a CentOS 7 test HA cluster I'm building I want both traditional >> services running on the cluster and VMs running on both nodes > > On a purely subjective note: I think that's a bad design. One of the >

--- In english --- Hello! I am to implement a new architecture of the network in my company but I do not know right where to start ... need help! Currently 90% of my servers are virtual machines under Xen. I have many valid IP networks and all Hypervisors are configured in bridge mode, to simplify. We have 3 VMWare ESX Hypervisor also in bridge mode. Some networks are exclusive to certain

Hello You must add first: vlan (tagged) to eth2 eth2 interface is not tagged by default and not know vlan-s . It is like a cisco if you have 24 ports in cisco by default all ports are in vlan1. if you want to do trunk (with vlans) you myst add (vlans) to this ports (tagged or untagged) So you can compare that all interfaces in linux by default are in one vlan(but not tagged). (only for

Hi all, I''m tring to isolate P2P traffic, specifically BitTorrent, for my QoS scripts. I can''t seem to completely isolate ALL BitTorrent traffic. I identify & mark packets and then use tc filters to put them into appropriate classes. My firewall rules (below) do the markings. My VoIP boxes'' and ICMP traffic get highest priority (mark 1). Then comes DNS, SSH,

Hi all, I''m trying to put a linux GW running with this seput: Internet -> DSL Modem -> VLAN2 \ eth2.2 Linux > Lan eth2.3

I couldn''t find anyone who had actually made it work via google so I guess I''ll ask here. My setup is a VPN point to point link. The VPN is a modified version of Openvpn where I''m using zlib compression to improve the compression a bit. The goal is to shape traffic coming from a routing server through the vpn to the endpoint of the vpn and in such a way maximize the

Hi, I''m trying to get a handle on hfsc. Here is my configuration: root@jmnrouter:/jmn# tc class show dev vlan1 class hfsc 1: root class hfsc 1:1 parent 1: ls m1 0bit d 0us m2 225000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 225000bit class hfsc 1:10 parent 1:1 rt m1 191000bit d 25.0ms m2 135000bit ls m1 0bit d 0us m2 135000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 225000bit class hfsc 1:20 parent 1:1 rt m1 22008bit d