similar to: New user's naive question

http://www.alsa-project.org/~iwai/audio-latency.pdf seems to suggest that ext3 should not be used with 2.6 kernels for audio work. Why is this, and is there likely to be any improvement? - Richard. -- Richard Kimber http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/

Hi, Using dumpe2fs I have been able to determine that all of my alternate ext3 superblocks are corrupted (not clean), and only the primary superblock is valid, i.e. mount works and the ordered journal is applied. When the primary superblock gets flakey, i.e. the ext_attr Filesystem feature goes missing - not sure why this occurs. At this point, the mount does not apply the journal using the

I found a thread that has almost the exact same symptoms as me, but didn't seem to come to a resolution: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/2004-December/msg00018.html I have an LVM(2) array that I've just lvextend'd and want to resize2fs, but I can't get through the e2fsck. I get these errors when fsck-ing: Group 3125's inode table at 102400545 conflicts with

Although the parameterized samples have allowed people to get a firewall up and running quickly, they have unfortunately set the wrong level of expectation among those who have used them. I am therefore withdrawing support for the samples and I am recommending that they not be used in new Shorewall installations. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \

Hi all (and developers in particular) I just got bitten by this Assertion. The one that starts as in the subject, and ends with: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" Google reminds me that it was mentioned a few times earlier this year, but I couldn't find any statement saying that it has been fixed. I got this in a 2.4.16 kernel, though the

There's a new set of ext2/3 patches for 2.4.21-pre5 available at: http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/extfs-update-2.4.21pre5-2 and in broken out form at: http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/extfs-2.4-update/broken-out-2.4.21pre5-2 New to this patch set include: * A kludge to help htree work well with Linux's NFS implementation * Allow the orlov allocator to be disabled via a

Is anyone using a 3com 3CNJPSE to power a 7960G? I have a couple of 7960Gs and 3CNJPSEs but no combination appears to work. Both phones work fine with a cisco power cube. I get a 47.6V reading across pins 5 and 8 on the patch cable coming from the 3CNJPSE. The network still works through the 3CNJPSE, just no power to the phone until I connect the power cube. Using two straight through wired

I've been beating myself senseless trying to build OpenSsh 3.0.1 on Solaris 2.5.1 and get AFS login working. The symptoms of the problem are: sshd builds (used --with-afs and -with-kerberos4 - there is no PAM on this box), accepts connections from non-AFS users, but does not accept a connection from an AFS user; the user sees "permission denied" after entering the password. The

I finally decided to get a little source code dirt under my fingernails tonight and dig through chan_sip.c to understand how registrations are currently implemented. The hope is to perhaps at least seed some ideas about how to make registrations to a server name, which resolves to multiple IPs, either attempt each IP in the order they're returned by dns, or, simply attempt to register with

Hello all, There seems to be a bug in internet explorer 5 where a redirect causes the session to be lost. A controller says.... def login case @request.method when :post if @session[:user] = User.authenticate(@params [:user_login], @params[:user_password]) return redirect_to(:action=>''send_confirmation'') unless

Let me set up a Very Dumb Question (VDQ). My apologies in advance for repeating much of this to those who have been of such vast help getting me this far. (Followup to: is set as gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general) I have a testbed machine which currently has /dev/hda1 - 6, according to qtparted, with sizes 102 MB, 14 GB, 13 GB, 13 GB, 12 GB, and 14 MB respectively (rounded to nearest whole MB or

Hi Guys, I have experienced a recent performance issue with an ext2 filesystem. Essentially I have had several files that get overwritten on average once per day. This has been happening for about a hear when the program accessing and reading those files started from several milliseconds to 15-20 seconds to open and read the file. Moving the directory to a new name and copying the contents

Would the following be symptoms of hardware problems or just a corrupt fs? Will fsck tonight when a new power supply is going into the machine. Kernel: 2.4.17 Drive: Maxtor D740X-6L 80GB connected via HPT366 Feb 25 21:26:33 viper kernel: hde: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Feb 25 21:26:33 viper kernel: hde: dma_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError },

<20100926154324.GD21843 at redhat.com>; from Michael S. Tsirkin on Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 17:43:24 +0200 > > > >It's vanilla 2.6.32.22, but I also reproduced this on Debian's 2.6.32-23 > > > >(based on 2.6.32.21). > > > > > > > >If offload is the only difference, I'll play with different offload > > > >options and check

Tom - here are a few suggestions Plantronics 510SL Bluetooth - they make a bundle that comes with a Bluetooth transceiver and a handset lifter. This is nice if you have users that already have Bluetooth headsets for their mobile phones, as it allows you to sync with their office phone as well. http://www.plantronics.com/north_america/en_US/products/cat29880043/cat2 9880054/prod5460016

<20100926154324.GD21843 at redhat.com>; from Michael S. Tsirkin on Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 17:43:24 +0200 > > > >It's vanilla 2.6.32.22, but I also reproduced this on Debian's 2.6.32-23 > > > >(based on 2.6.32.21). > > > > > > > >If offload is the only difference, I'll play with different offload > > > >options and check

(sort-of xposted from linux-kernel) Hi, I am wondering how to interpret this error message, which popped up on a 2.4.26 SMP x86 box two days ago: EXT2-fs: corrupt root inode, run e2fsck init_special_inode: bogus imode (37316) EXT2-fs: corrupt root inode, run e2fsck init_special_inode: bogus imode (37316) EXT2-fs: corrupt root inode, run e2fsck The problem is, the error message doesn't

Hi all, I've got an ongoing battle with samba shipped with Sun Solaris 10 in it's current form (Samba version 3.0.28a) not wanting to talk to my OpenLDAP master correctly. Essentially, under certain conditions, this behaviour is observed, in the log.smbd: [2008/10/11 08:54:03, 1, pid=13610] libsmb/cliconnect.c:(1451) Error connecting to 192.168.117.150 (Connection refused)

I don't know enough about it to know whether this is a known problem (I couldn't make much sense of what I found on Google), but it seems to be a journal-related issue. Is it likely that data has been corrupted? Do I need to take any action? 2.6.12-9-amd64-k8-smp, Ubuntu 5.10, dual opteron 2GB Jan 23 03:08:22 infinity kernel: [24686.841032] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer

Version 1.0 of the Quick Start Guide and accompanying sample configurations is available at: http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_quickstart_guide.htm. Comments and suggestions are most welcome. Thanks, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ teastep@shorewall.net