Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Win2k - samba-2.2.8a - can't get above 4MB/sec"
2006 Feb 08
0
[Bug 443] New: 2.6 kernel failing in NAT with significant outbound traffic
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=443
Summary: 2.6 kernel failing in NAT with significant outbound
traffic
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.6.x
Platform: i386
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
Component: NAT
AssignedTo:
2004 Aug 01
2
more on troubles with dmz www server
Thanks for the tips, Tom.
Here is the tcpdump -n output on the dmz computer - this gets repeated
several times as the remote computer attempts to connect:
18:11:54.264580 66.113.134.243.55080 > 192.168.2.1.8082: S
3210481212:3210481212(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 65650966
0,nop,wscale 0> (DF)
18:11:54.264696 192.168.2.1.8082 > 66.113.134.243.55080: S
2004 Nov 22
0
Samba machine wanting to connect to 192.168.192.1
I have a samba machine used by some users but most users use the windows
2003 server.
It all works fine except when one particular user connects to the samba
machine the samba machine will then try to connect to 192.168.192.1.
This drives our netowrk people crazy because we don't have any machines
in the network that are 192.anything.
We are using a fairly old version of samba - 2.2.3a. At
2004 May 24
0
samba 3 keeps trying to authenticate with the nt4 pdc using port 445
Hello,
I'm running redhat enterprise as 3.2 with the included samba
3.0.2-6.3E. I'm trying to make this a domain member server in a nt4
domain. I've successfully joined the domain only after using the net
join -p 139 option to force samba to use port 139, otherwise it kept
trying to communicate over port 445. (I was watching the syn packets
with tethereal). Typing wbinfo -g comes
2003 Aug 16
1
update: Win2kPro's TCP/IP Stack is crippled!
I've been doing some testing between Windows 2000 Pro (SP4) and Windows 2000
Server (no SP and SP4) -- specifcally testing file transfers from a Samba
2.2.8a server.
Samba server: P4/2.2GHz, ServerWorks chipset, SCSI UW2 disk subsystem
(Bonnie++ tested to 35MB/sec), 3Com (acenic) gigabit ethernet
Win2kPro: P3/700, 3Com Vortex 100mbit network card
Win2kServer: P3/800, 3Com Vortex 100mbit
2018 May 11
0
Samba, AD and devices compatibility...
On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 15:48 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote:
> Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
> Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply.
Thanks!
>
> Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction
> printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain.
>
>
2018 May 11
0
Samba, AD and devices compatibility...
to my knowlidge, konica = xerox.
and this works fine imo but im not able to look this up now.
i did have xerox connected to my ldapS addc’s.
i can check this monday.
Greetz,
Louis
> Op 11 mei 2018 om 04:09 heeft Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 15:48 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote:
>> Mandi!
2018 May 10
2
Samba, AD and devices compatibility...
Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba
In chel di` si favelave...
Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply.
Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction
printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain.
But authentication does not work, seems bacause that printer try to use
SASL over plain LDAP (no SSL nor TLS).
After
2007 Aug 09
0
Problem with packet mangling over 2 links
Hi
I have a strange problem. I have a firewall with 3 nics.
1 - lan
2 - leased line or diginet
3 - connected to adsl modem
I have 2 tables in defined in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables:
200 diginet
201 adsl
The ADSL modem has an IP of 192.168.0.1 and is configured to initiate
the PPPOE connection. I can mark packets within the network destined
for port 80 successfully:
ip ro add default via x.x.x.x
2003 Mar 03
0
Windows 98 Client or Linux problem?
I'm running Samba on a Linux 7.2 recently upgraded to 8.0 system. I have
a problem that occurred
in 7.2 and also occurs in 8.0. My clients are Windows 98. If a client
reboots then regularly it is
not possible to access files on the Linux server without restarting smb
on the server. On the
Windows 98 clients, in network neighbourhood I get \\Robert is not
accessible. No permission
to access
2011 Mar 11
1
[Bug 704] Issue with "iptables -A OUTPUT -m string"
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704
CZ <huangj at qualcomm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #4 from CZ <huangj at qualcomm.com>
2018 Mar 13
2
Samba, AD and devices compatibility...
I'm trying to test/move some of my LDAP-enabled devices from my actual
OpenLDAP server(s) to my new samba AD domain.
For now, i'm poking with printers, and i'm testing a Konica-Minolta
BizHub C224e.
Defining user autentication to external source, i can set (between
LDAP, NTLM, NDS, ...) 'Active Directory', and i can/must provide the
domain naime.
After that, DNS and kerberos
2012 Apr 23
2
Windows 2008R2 AD, kerberos, NFSv4
Hi,
I'm trying to set up NFSv4 on two boxes (centos 5.5) and have it
authenticate against our Windows 2008R2 AD server acting as the KDC.
(samba/winbind is running ok with "idmap config MYCOMPANY: backend = rid"
so we have identical ids across the servers.)
I can mount my test directory fine via NFSv4 *without* the sec=krb5 option.
However, once I put the sec=krb5 option in,
2005 Mar 02
12
Problem with outgoing Masquerade
I''m having another little problem with my new firewall. I want outgoing port
25 from my mail server to appear on the address 65.223.121.227 so I created
the file masq:
eth2 192.168.124.18 65.223.121.227 tcp 25
eth1 eth5
eth1 eth3
eth1 eth4
eth1 == net0 == 209.189.103.196/27
eth2 == net1 == 65.223.121.237/28
eth3 == dmz0
eth4 == dmz1
eth5 == loc ==
2007 Apr 23
1
Ubuntu feisty: trouble with vmware-player host-guest access...
I post here this ''user'' triuble because i suppose it came from some
strange kernel (mis)configuration.
I''ve just upgrade from edgy to feisty, and the communication between
guest and host in bridge mode stop working.
And in a rather, at least for me, strange way.
I can ping from host to guest:
root@host:~# ping guest
PING guest (10.5.2.120) 56(84) bytes of data.
64
2005 May 11
0
AD authentication almost but not quite
Client is a centos-3.4 box, Server (DC) is Windows 2K AD.
I'm able to see user and group accounts on the DC but not able to authenticate against it.
wbinfo -a does not rely on pam module, correct?
[root@linux04 root]# net ads testjoin
Join is OK
[root@linux04 root]# net ads info
LDAP server: 172.16.100.202
LDAP server name: p69ms101
Realm: PORTSEATTLE.ORG
Bind Path: dc=PORTSEATTLE,dc=ORG
2009 Jun 11
2
router NAT problem
Hello All. I have a strange problem on my router. I use a xl2tpd
program to establish a connection to the INTERNET. After I start xl2tpd
it's create a new ppp0 device with correct ip parameters, also it's add
some routes to the routing table and all this routes are correct too.
After connection with provider are establish the router exec some simple
iptables+NAT commands to give an
2005 Mar 26
1
Very slow wbinfo -u
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have set up Samba-3.0.11 to retrive account information from W2k
server via winbind, and it works.
But is takes about 10 sec. to retrive the information.
I have dumped some traffic from the request, and it looks like this:
A lot of these:
21:21:55.133423 172.20.3.131.1077 > 172.20.3.130.137: NBT UDP
PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; UNICAST
2007 Feb 15
1
Dovecot not responding
Hi all,
I'm pulling my hair out on this problem and wanted to throw it out there
to see if anyone else had run across it.
I recently restarted my server. There were some network config issues
that caused the interfaces not to come back up, but my colo company got
those resolved.
However, after restart, my IMAPS server has stopped responding to
outside requests. I can successfully access
2005 Apr 22
4
I have a problem similar to FAQ 2 scenario, but reply packets don''t seem to be recognized.
Hello,
I am running Shorewall 2.0.2f, on SuSE 9.2 distro, kernel
2.6.8-24.11-default
My ip addr show output is as follows:
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: