similar to: Accessing Shares with WXP Pro

I am the tech coordinator in a small public school in rural North Dakota and all of last year I ran Samba on redhat 8.0. I had XP machines that used Samba as the PDC. Worked fine. But now I am getting some XP home machines that cannot log on to a domain. That's okay, because I am determined this year to use solely redhat. In fact, I put the partitions down to 5 gig for Windows and

Here is my problem: Previously, I was using Samba as a PDC and everybody logged in with WXP and then they had roaming profiles and all was grand, except sometimes my students had really big pictures and such being saved to their "My Documents." That's bad. When it came time to log off, other students sometimes had to wait 20 minutes. A Bad thing. So, this year, I scrapped

Well I thank everybody that helped me get swat working. I am very thankful. Now, though, it seems I have more problems. When I try to join my samba domain, my XP box says "a domain controller for the domain edith could not be contacted." Okay, well, after reading up on things in this list, it seems that I need to create a machine account. I didn't have to on my NT box. When I

Hello everyone I hope this is the right place to post this question. I have all but eliminated all Microsoft servers in my current work environment, expect two boxes, which are our PDC and BDC, they also are the DNS, Dial in With Rocket Port Card, DHCP, Winslookup servers. I would like to remove these NT boxes and replace them with a nice shiny new Linux box running Samba. Reading some of

Thanks to everyone who has tried to help so far. Not quite there but I think I'm close. For anyone new, it's a private 2 comp network (RH9 and WXP) so I just want the simplest guest access possible. This is my current smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = SAMBA encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd security = share null

hello, i have a linux machine running samba with these settings: workgroup = ... netbios name = ... interfaces = lo eth1 bind interfaces only = yes hosts allow = .... smb ports = 139 local master = no os level = 35 domain master = yes preferred master = yes wins support = yes dns proxy = no browseable = yes .... the wxp computers have dhcp enable, the dhcp server has these

Oh, so you are using ldap..., well I'm still working with smbpasswd as backend :-( Anyway, I tried 'net getlocalsid' for the domain-sid -> ok Next 'net usersidlist' which should show me the user-sids -> didn't work: "[2004/03/04 06:40:05, 0, pid=31232, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] utils/net_rpc.c:net_usersidlist(2158) Could not get the user/sid list" So

I got half way through an installation of CentOS on a box that has Window$ 98 in the first partition and Window$ XP in the second, where CentOS was designated for partitions 3 (/boot - 128MB) and 4 (/) and had some strange results. During the install, I changed the default OS to boot to Window$ (because I rarely use this machine, but others who don't have a clue use Wxx), but then while the

Hi, I've finally gotten my LDAP password backend up and running, and finally figured out the SID 1000/1001 thing for Samba admin. However I'm unable to join the workstation to my domain. Using any random user in the WXP dialogue, I get the "Access is Denied" error. Fair enough. Using the user with sambasid and sambagroupsid s-*-1000/s-*-1001, I get the error "The Username

I have a Samba 3 PDC running with an LDAP backend on Red Hat 8. All authentication appears to be working correctly but I can't login to the domain from a W2K or WXP Pro workstation after I have successfully joined them to the domain. If I login locally to the workstation I can browse the Samba shares just fine. I have checked the schannel and sign or seal settings on both the workstations

Hello, New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8: . search BODY "waldo" * SEARCH . OK Search completed (0.000 secs). . SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 OR SUBJECT "waldo" FROM "waldo" * SEARCH . OK Search completed (1.768 secs). . SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 OR SUBJECT "waldo" BODY

Can anyone recommend a company that does professional Asterisk recordings for things like IVR, greetings, MOH, announcements, etc? Thanks, Waldo

Hi, We are running into a problem with a Samba setup and would like to know if a current fix or workaround is at all possible. Our setup is a NetApp filer serving NFS v4 that is mounted by Solaris and Linux servers. On those servers we are using Samba to create shares of those NFSv4 mounted filesystems. We are migrating to this NFSv4 setup from an existing Solaris NFSv3+Posix ACL setup that also

Hi list, while preparing for the changed ACL/mode_t mapping semantics coming with onnv-147 [1], I discovered that in onnv-134 on my system ACLs are not inherited when aclmode is set to passthrough for the filesystem. This very much puzzles me. Example: $ uname -a SunOS os 5.11 snv_134 i86pc i386 i86pc $ pwd /Volumes/ACLs/dir1 $ zfs list | grep /Volumes rpool/Volumes 7,00G 39,7G 6,84G

I'm looking for an inexpensive way to connect 20 analog phones to asterisk. I could get a bunch of Linksys or Sipura boxes but was wondering if there is a more cost effective way? I came across the Mediatrix 1104 and even the Mediatrix 1124 but that comes out to be almost $100/port. I might as well buy inexpensive IP phone. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks, Waldo

Hello Samba List, i have problems sharing, or better connecting to a printer shared via samba (3.0.10): Situation: - W2K ADS Domain - which auth's the users - WXP Client, which log's in via the W2K-ADS (and auth's of course) - Samba (Linux) ADS-Member, which shares Printer and $HOME - security=ADS - winbind to get AUTH-Info from the W2K ADS Controller Everything seems to work

I'm planning on setting up some remote agents and before doing so, I did some simple PING tests to measure latency. The average latency I got was 250ms. Does anyone have experience in terms of quality of calls when there is such high latency? Can anyone comment? Thanks, Waldo

Alexander, These are the only two CVEs from 2016 that I found contained in the RPM that you referenced. - add security fix for CVE-2016-5387 - mod_ssl: add security fix for CVE-2016-4979 -- Tyler Waldo Information Security Associate Threat and Vulnerability Management Mobile: (650) 410-0776 On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > Am

Hi all, Assuming 1.0.7 is the latest stable version, how/where can I find out the different CVS revisions available and a description of what has been patched/updated in each CVS revision so I can decide whether to leave my 1.0.7 installation as is, or if I need (or think I need) to patch it with a CVS version? Thanks, Waldo

I'm wondering if anyone can recommend one over the other. I'm mostly interested in running open source solutions, so I would prefer if your recommendations are within the open source arena. Basically, I contemplated the idea of using SER as a NAT Helper and possibly as a SIP server for a portion of our user base. We prefer to have Asterisk in the mix because of the additional