similar to: patch: smbclient lost some files

Hi, I think I found a bug in usage of zlib. rsync 2.5.6 with -z fails like bellow. % cp install-disk2.iso /var/tmp/install-disk2.iso install-disk2.iso 100% |*****************************| 316 MB 00:56 % rsync -vIz install-disk2.iso 127.0.0.1:/var/tmp/install-disk2.iso install-disk2.iso deflate on token returned 0 (16384 bytes left) rsync error: error in rsync protocol

Hi! Here's a patch that allows Linux smbfs to list large directories (i.e. > 100 items) when talking to an OS/2 server. There is a misunderstanding about the flags sent in the FINDFIRST request which causes the OS/2 server to indicate an EOS (end of search) in the FINDFIRST response, even when there are more items to be listed. The result is that smbfs will display only the first ~120

I am not a member of the samba listserv, but I wanted to contribute the following code to the samba effort. The following is clipped from some experimental changes I have made to my own copy of the samba source. I have not included all of the changes because I don't have the time to. But someone should be able to properly do the integration without too much effort. Summary, these

Hi, I've found a problem with samba when printing from a client running win95 + DFS. The print fails with a segmentation fault. The problem is that Win95 does not return the proper file_fsp( smb_vwv0) when doing an IOCTL request.This causes the file_fsp call in reply_ioctl (smbd/reply.c) to fail cause a segmentation fault. I do not understand how samba work, but here is my working patch

> I have just upgraded to Samba 2.0.6 and can no longer connect to Samba > shares on my FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE machine. When I attempt to connect, the > smb.log contains the following information: > > [2000/01/04 17:54:42, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(566) > resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name > NTWEB2.AIS.MSU.EDU<0x20> > [2000/01/04

Hello, I'm having problems with using smbclient on a win2k share. The server runs samba 3.0.14a on Solaris 9. I want to tar the whole directory of a share. Into a file on the server What I found out so far is, that it works until a maximum file count of 35. It is not size dependant but if the file count in that share exceeds more than 35 the smbclient hangs for ever and with the time is

Am 27.06.2000 19:58:44 schrieb urban: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 klaus-georg.adams@rwg.de wrote: > > > > > Hi Andrew, > > your patch from 2.2.15 to 2.2.16, backing out the older protocol levels breaks > > reading from an OS/2 LAN Server. > > The appended patch fixes things for me (against 2.2.16). > > This backs out a lot of desired changes. For example I think

smbclient (and smbtar) in version 2.2.7a (and prior) has problems with large files (> 4GB). The following patch (against 2.2.7a) fixes all known problems with this. This code has been checked into the CVS tree in all branches as well. -- ====================================================================== Herb Lewis Silicon Graphics Networking Engineer

Hello everyone I have recently reported problems reading a certain directory from an NT server on this list (and speculated in causes). I have a few workarounds and now I'm looking for some feedback on what the proper fix is and for people to test if my patch works for them. Please test smbfs with and without the patch on the directory in this zipfile (all files are empty):

I've released version 2.6.0 of rsync. Two important things to note in the new release: 1. The default remote shell is now "ssh" unless you tell the configure you want to use something else. 2. Some bug fixes in the include/exclude code, while making things work properly, have resulted in some user-visible changes for certain wildcard strings. Read the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ========================================================== == == Subject: Potential Denial of Service bug in smbd == CVE ID#: CVE-2007-0452 == == Versions: Samba 3.0.6 - 3.0.23d (inclusive) == == Summary: A logic error in the deferred open code == can lead to an infinite loop in smbd ==

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ========================================================== == == Subject: Potential Denial of Service bug in smbd == CVE ID#: CVE-2007-0452 == == Versions: Samba 3.0.6 - 3.0.23d (inclusive) == == Summary: A logic error in the deferred open code == can lead to an infinite loop in smbd ==

Can someone share the smbfs-2.4.19-pre9-readdir.patch. -----Original Message----- From: David.Lee@bisus.com [mailto:David.Lee@bisus.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:21 PM To: vlads@sympatico.ca; urban@teststation.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; David.Lee@bisus.com Subject: [Samba] RE: [PATCH] smbfs readdir fix (CFT: NetApp, OS/2) Vlad. I still got the same problem - 'ls | wc -l'

I am trying to use smbclient to migrate data from OS/2 LanServers to a filesystem on an AIX 4.3.1 machine. Everything works great except renaming directories on the OS/2 LanServer. I get the error ERRDOS - ERRbadfile (File not found.) renaming files when I do a "rename <existing_dir_name> <new_dir_name>" at the prompt, but <existing_dir_name> exists. I connected to a

I'm preparing to roll out a bunch of win XP clients and and am running down all the quirks that come up in the application log on my test box. 1) AutoEnrollement fails - samba is not an active directory so this makes sense it must be disabled by editing the group policy with gpedit.msc computer configuration->windows settings -> security settings -> public key policies ->

Just spoke to Jerry, we'll be doing a 3.0.27a on Monday to fix a regression that broke smbfs mounts from Linux. Sorry for the problem. Jeremy.

Dear Samba users, I am trying to update our local samba packages to 3.0.28. They are built against heimdal-1.0.1 and openldap-2.3.38. The Redhat Enterprise Linux 3 and 4 packages are working fine so far in my limited testing. The problem with heimdal and "net ads join..." has been fixed on all 3 platforms. On the Solaris 8 server, the "net ads join..." works correctly and the

have a hosts allow or hosts deny line in your smb.conf. If you don't want samba to do reverse lookups, then comment out any allow/deny hosts lines in your smb.conf file. Don -----Original Message----- From: future@yxtc.edu.cn [mailto:future@yxtc.edu.cn] Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 3:00 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: dns and samba Hi, I find that my samba server always does

<-----------------------------------------------------------------------> Changes to user passwords are captured by a special DLL, which traps and then stores the password changes in encrypted form in a private area. On each synchronization schedule, the synchronization service first examines the SAM file for changes, and then checks this private area for passwords to be synchronized. Once