similar to: FW: Samba + LDAP

Hola a todos! Tengo algunos problemas con el tamaño de la matriz de términos que obtengo. Los comandos que utilizo son los siguientes: # carga librerias library(tm) library(wordcloud) library(Rstem) library(Snowball) # lee el documento UTF-8 y lo convierte a ASCII txt <-

Paul Cliff wrote: > just a thought but do the clients really need all printers to be > available ? > If not you could split the clients into groups giving each group > a separate smb.conf with only the relevant shares This is precisely what I am trying to achieve - but in order to do so I need to be able to run multiple instances of smbd which until today wasn't working -

When doing a vampire all my PC's are shown in the resulting log as being members of the Domain Users group and none of my "real users" are shown yet in Ldap all my users are shown with memberUid in the domain users group and no computers are shown eg: dn: cn=Domain Users,ou=Groups,<snip> objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: sambaGroupMapping gidNumber: 513 cn: Domain Users

Possibly slightly off topic, has anyone ever had Cisco 79xx Series phones come up with "cannot complete conference" errors when trying to conference two calls together? This message may be private and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system. Gyron may monitor email traffic data and the content of email for the purposes

Hi This is Vignesh with Makro Technologies, Inc. We have been in business for over 10 years and we are one of the Fast 500 National IT staffing and Solution firms in USA. Our clients include country’s top-notch IT, Healthcare, Pharmaceutical, Financial, Telecom,Government and other industries. Staying current with technology, finding great consultants and exceeding our clients''

Hello, I'm having a problem with a few Polycom SoundStation 6000s. Everything works fine, but they drop registration to asterisk after about maybe 30 minutes - the phone does not re-try to register and if you try to dial out on the phone it says "URI Dialing is Disabled" Has anyone else had this issue? I'm running asterisk 11.7.0. This message may be private and confidential.

Are the phones exposed to the internet (even using NAT)? If so there is a good chance these calls are not coming through your PBX but are coming in direct from someone, usually scammers. Polycom has a config option to disable accepting calls from unknown devices. No idea if Cisco has something similar. From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at

Hi, In my dialplan I have the following line. same => n,Set(CALLERID(name)=Support) I am expecting this to always set the caller id name to 'Support' - however, we are getting calls come in as "Anonymous" with the number as something like "unknown at unknown" We're using Cisco 7945 phones - I possibly wonder if they are displaying this rather than asterisk

We were using G722 - I thought similarly and tried a call with alaw. Same problem occurred, any other ideas? > I'm willing to bet you are forcing the use of G729. 7940 and 7960 phones can > only do a single G729 channel, and if you require G729 for the second leg of a > conference, it will fail. This message may be private and confidential. If you have received this message in

> Apparently this is a known problem past v8 firmware: > http://kaa.kiev.ua/blog/asterisk-and-cisco-7945g-after-sip-firmware-update- > version-9/ I've done some more playing about and what I've noticed is that even when using TCP SIP on the 8.x Firmware conferencing doesn?t work - making it use UDP fixes this. So has anyone managed to get the 9.x firmware working with UDP?

> Next step is packet capture to see if there is a clue as to the cause of the > failure in the SIP signalling. Right, I see the following when running SIP Debug. Looks to me like the phones are expecting the server to do the conference mixing, which I guess it would do in CallManager? <--- SIP read from TCP:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:50604 ---> REFER sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx SIP/2.0 Via:

Hello all- I'm looking to tweak password settings for my domain but have a few question regarding the settings under "samba-tool domain passwordsettings show". While I found some settings were documented on the wiki (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Password_Settings_Objects), I did not find answers to a few questions I had. If "maximum password age (days)" is set to

First of all, I want to say I have been using Samba AD for two years now (since just before 4.0 went stable), and it is an amazing product. We've implemented Active Directory & Group Policy for almost 50 computers and 100 users. Unfortunately, we are now being forced into switching to Windows DCs because Samba does not have an account lockout feature. Citrix (stupidly) does not have

Hi there, With the new scrutinization by auditors on account policies and auditing, how can Samba be SOX compliant? Using 3.0.14a-sernet on Suse 9.1 - ldapsam Specifically, a couple of things seem to be lacking: 1) Logon/Logoff times are not being recorded The last logon time recorded in my ldap entries are pre-nt4 migration. 2) Do the Audit Policy values in user manager have any effect? Are

Hi, im trying to setup a password policy with samba and openldap. while lockout works perfect on openldap it looks like it does not work with my samba. Ive set "sambaLockoutThreshold" to 3 and "sambaLockoutDuration" to -1 (lockout forever) within the Domain-Object in LDAP. So i expect whenever a windows user does 3 false logon attemps his samba account will be LOCKED

Hello, I have a samba 4.1.5. I have created OUs and linked GPO to OU for account lockout policies. Account Lockout Duration: 15min Account Lockout Threshold: 5 invalid attempts Reset Account lockout counter after: 15min I have created a test account and logged in with an incorrect password more than 5 times to a machine. but the test account never locks and the computer never prompts me that

I recently am migrating my PDC from NT4 to Samba 3.025. Apparently due to a mismatch between the capitalization of the Windows account and the Unix account (Administrator vs administrator) I managed to lock the account before catching the discrepenacy. # pdbedit -v administrator Unix username: Administrator NT username: Administrator Account Flags: [ULX Bad password count

Hi everybody, I think i need a samba guru to solve this issue, because googling for months did not help and the problem is becoming pressing. I'm facing an annoying problem with samba. In detail, there is something wrong with the password handling. It happens from windows, mac or linux clients. Randomly (probably after $num days), the system asks to the user to change the password. After the

When a user tries logging in and enters the wrong password a few times in a row, their account becomes disabled. Is there a way to prevent this behavior? I couldn't find anything in the smb.conf man page about it. Alternatively, could we use a preexec script to just re-enable all accounts when there's a logon attempt? Or does that script only get executed after a user is authenticated?

Hi! I have one question about passwordsettings in Samba 4: My configuration: S.O. : Ubuntu 16.04 Samba Version:  4.7.7 -- samba-tool domain passwordsettings show Password complexity: on Store plaintext passwords: off Password history length: 24 Minimum password length: 7 Minimum password age (days): 0 Maximum password age (days): 180 Account lockout duration (mins): 30 Account lockout