similar to: Raidzone, reiserfs, huge files

I am working with a Raidzone tech to solve a problem with our Raidzone NAS. The tech told me he has not yet posted to any Samba list about this, and gave me permission to do so. Using XCOPY from either NT4SP6a or W2KSP3, over varying network paths, a file of 18,490,235K-1 bytes or smaller will copy to the NAS successfully in about 45 minutes, but a file of 18,490,256K-1 bytes or larger will

Hi, folks, I'm busy getting ready to surplus an old RAIDZONE - the model is listed as "RDZEXT". Has anyone dealt with them? I've just taken care of the 15 drives in it, but I need to know if there's an *internal* drive that I have to take the box apart to get at. mark

Okay, I've been lurking on this list for several weeks and have finally gotten rsync to work well when transferring files from one box to another. It is really great for passing lots of files from one machine to another, i.e. ripped MP3 to my home Linux machine, as one example. Now I am ready to take the next big step. I have a large 1.5 terabyte server from Raidzone that I have NFS mounted

Hi, I'm upgrading my mail server tomorrow from CentOS 3 to CentOS 4.1. And I'd like to use ReiserFS this time around since everyone says it performs much better with smaller files (all the mail is in Maildir's instead of mbox'es). Right now I have a pretty basic filesystem layout: /boot, swap, and /. Am I making the correct assumption that I can't install CentOS with

I have samba 3.0.14-5 installed (installed via Fedora Core 4's Yum) I have enabled "client NTLMv2 auth = yes" in smb.conf When I run "ntlm_auth --username=user --domain=MYDOM" it connects fine (change user and MYDOM to be my user and my domain) When I run "ntlm_auth --username=user --domain=MYDOM --diagnostics" it fails on all tests with "wrong password"

I am considering couple options of converting a current service into a HA using multi servers or any other solutions. The point is that I am thinking about the options and which I am looking for. NFS can be a storage which has it's own pros and cons. There is the option of DRBD but as of now it's limited for two hosts. What options do exist out-there as a solution? The main issues are

I'm in the process of building a home file server and am of course going to use Linux 2.4 (2.4.6 for now...). I'm waffling between resierfs and ext3. I've read the ext3 page and some of the mailing list archives but have a few questions remaining. (I apologize in advance if they are redundant.) Are there any known issues with: - LVM - LVM snapshots (more on that in a sec) -

I am going to list my current plans for rebuilding a Law Firm?s network. I hope that someone will be able to tell me which project (samba or samba-tng) would be a better choice, or if staying with MS is the only choice. If my plan could be changed for the better, input would be greatly appreciated: A lot of this information is useless for my questions, but I am throwing it in anyway. --------

Anyone out there using small-midsized (2-4 TB) SAN solution among multiple Asterisk systems? I don't have the budget for an EMC-caliber solution, and can't seem to find much else out there. Thanks, Adam The contents of this email message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmission is sent

Full_Name: Raimar Falke Version: R version 2.10.0 (2009-10-26) OS: Linux 2.6.27-16-generic #1 SMP Tue Dec 1 19:26:23 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux Submission from: (NULL) (134.102.222.56) The construction of a data frame in the way shown below requires much more memory than expected. If we assume a cell value takes 8 bytes the total amount of the data is 128mb. However the process takes about

Hello, I have a 1.3TB ext3 filesystem that has been in service for about 3 months. About 6 days ago the Emulex fibrechannel controller logged a SCSI error and the filesystem changed to RO. It appears that the filesystem instantly changes to RO and prevents the journal from working, therefore invalidating the filesystem. The filesystem was unmounted and a remount was attempted. The mount failed

Hi perhaps someone else already had the same problem. Problem description: I''m running a class B University network with approx 10k hosts attached. I would now like to stop traffic from and to hosts in my network not already registered in my DNS server. This means I''ve to handle with approx 50k rules|routes. Sure I can summarize the unalloctaed address space a little bit with

Hello All. Is there a kernel module or something that can be yum'd on centos 4.4 to get rieserfs support? Trying to mount a raid device and getting: mount: fs type reiserfs not supported by kernel Thanks, Thomas -- Flambeau Inc. Technology Center - Baraboo, WI Email : tblader at flambeau.com Keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu KeyID: 0x00E9EC2C

Will I run into any problems mixing ReiserFS and ext3 on my slackware linux box? I'm using ReiserFS and LVM on the current version, thinking of mixing it up a bit with slackware 10, again with LVM. Thanks for any advice! ===== Christopher Mark Conn http://storm.cadcam.iupui.edu/~cmcgoat Austin, Texas, USA

I am trying to compile 2.2.20 with both ext3 and reiserfs (to easily migrate from reiserfs to ext3 :-) All patches merge nicly, but compile fails because "buffer_journaled" is defined by both reiserfs and ext3. I looked at the "2.2.14 ext3 + reiserfs incompatibility"-thread on the kernel list and figured out that renaming "buffer_journaled" in fs/buffer.c and

Chris Mason wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > Here's a new patch against 2.4.8-pre8, updated to Al's new super > handling. The differences between the original are small, > but they are big enough that I want extra testing from the > LVM guys (and ext3/XFS). ext3 will probably lock up on unmount with 2.4.8-pre8. The fix is to replace fsync_dev with fsync_no_super in

> ext3 will probably lock up on unmount with 2.4.8-pre8. The fix is > to replace fsync_dev with fsync_no_super in fs/ext3/super.c and > fs/jbd/recovery.c. I'll be generating a new patchset this weekend. Actually if you dont fix recovery.c it will hang the machine when you mount an fs that needs recovering. With the old patches at least umount of ext3 seems fine as is. Alan

Hi - if I have a doubly patched kernel (2.4.5) (1) Apply gkernel/CVS ext3 patches (2) Apply Neil Brown/Reiserfs team knfsd and reiserfs patches Will ext3 be exportable by knfsd (i.e. inherit automagically the nfsd_operations thingies from ext2) or does it need further patching? -- Chan Shih-Ping (Richard) <cshihpin@dso.org.sg> DSO National Laboratories 20 Science Park Drive

Hi All. What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some servers which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a filesystem for database systems and would like to know if ReiserFS will be maintained in CentOS/Linux kernel in the future? Best regards, Rafal.

HELLO: Are there somebody had met some error like " /bin/ls: /data: Structure needs cleaning " which happening when run "ls " or other linux command in gluster client mounted directory ,the client system is SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 (x86_64) , 2.6.16.60-0.21-xen . glusterfs-2.0.0rc1 + fuse-2.7.4glfs11 + SUSE10 SP2 ~ # mount /dev/xvda3 on / type