similar to: ACL re-implementation

Hi guys, I've got a problem where if I set permissions on a folder(Admin) "setfacl -R -d -m u::rwx,g::wrx,o::- Admin/" and "setfacl -m o:- Admin" I get the following. mail:/data/samba/shared # getfacl Admin/ # file: Admin # owner: BCP+administrator # group: samba user::rwx user:samba:rwx group::rwx group:BCP+admin:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx

Hello, I currently try to copy a directory locally between two ext4 filesystems while preserving permissions and ACLs using the -aAX options. Under some conditions, rsync does not copy the posix permissions completely, it changes the group::rwx to a group::--- permission. The latest rsync available on Debian Jessie is 3.1.1, but the changelog for 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 did not seem to mention such a bug

Please if anyone has any info... Neil Wilson wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've got a problem where if I set permissions on a folder(Admin) > "setfacl -R -d -m u::rwx,g::wrx,o::- Admin/" and "setfacl -m o:- Admin" > > I get the following. > > mail:/data/samba/shared # getfacl Admin/ > # file: Admin > # owner: BCP+administrator > # group: samba

Look at the acl(5) man page and you'll see that the ACCESS CHECK ALGORITH starts: IF the effective user ID of the process matches the user ID of the file object owner ... ELSE IF the effective user ID of the process matches the qualifier of any entry of type ACL_USER, THEN IF the matching ACL_USER entry and the ACL_MASK entry contain the requested permissions, access is

I removed the vestments of the DC user.map. I had already trying to reset the permissions, following this session: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs#Troubleshooting When I try to reset the permissions as shown in the bottom page of the ACL Windows page, nothing happens. # ls -l /mnt/data total 20 drwxrwxr-x+ 3 administrator domain admins 4096 Set 30 09:44 NTI

I've been playing with filesystem ACLs and wanted to integrate that with Samba to create a more transparent end user experiance. I have set up and tested a JFS partition with ACL support. I can use getfacl and setfacl with no problems to set permissions as needed. It works great. I compiled Samba with ACL support using the --with-acl configure option. Unfortunately I can't seem to

Hi, I recently tried to use ACLs with samba. XFS is running, I can set ACLs using setfacl and read them with getfacl, no problem so far. Samba compiled fine with '--with-acl-support'. Now I set up a share with 'nt acl support = yes', put there a file and added an acl with 'setfacl': root@edjo[ACLTEST]# getfacl datei.txt # file: datei.txt # owner: odenbach # group:

Hi, I'm trying to implement the XFS ACLs under samba 2.2.2. I'd compiled a new kernel with xfs support and all the ACL functions (setfacl, getfacl, etc) works well. I'd then compiled samba 2.2.2 with the --with-acl option, and it seems to be happy with that. Now I'm trying to access the ACLs via windows clients. A client could modify the access right existing until it

On 22/11/15 10:04, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, jimc! > >> After much wailing and gnashing of teeth, I did a setfacl. > Unfortunately, Samba does not use POSIX ACL's, if its own ACL's are present on > files. (If at all.) > Unless you have it configured for POSIX ACL's, but that's not the case for DC. Samba doesn't use ACLs at all, it is just a bridge

A bit of a minor off-topic issue, but on the off-chance that someone understands how ACLs work ... I've been trying to see if using default ACLs would help with the following issue: I have a third party application that is running as a non-root user ('user-a') and creating log files with mode 0600 (read/write only to the owner) in a log directory I have another application that

hi, I've recently set up a SAMBA/PDC domain controler with LDAP. My homes shares are in a XFS quota/acl enabled filesystem setfacl/getfacl works onto the linux Mandrake 9.2 box well, I mean user with more permissions set into ACL can write to the directory concerned. My problem is that ACL file permissions seems to not be readed by Samba when accessing files with a w2k box. here is more

Hi, On a windows client if I attempt to modify the permissions on a file which resides on a linux server, when I hit "apply or ok" my changes are lost. Doing it from the unix cli (using setfacl) works as expected and the changes are not lost. Yet on windows if I right click - properties - Security. select add, add a user or group, hit Apply and the user/group I just added is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 #$ setfacl -m u:mf:r bla #$ getfacl bla # file: bla # owner: root # group: root user::rw- user:mf:r-- group::r-- mask::r-- other::r-- It is readable by mf like intended. #$ chmod go-rwx bla #$ getfacl bla # file: bla # owner: root # group: root user::rw- user:mf:r-- #effective:--- group::r-- #effective:--- mask::--- other::--- It is not

Right now, FreeBSD supports one type of ACLs - so called POSIX.1e ACLs. They are natural extension of the traditional Unix permissions, and for a long time were the only nonproprietary ACL type in Unix systems. Times change, and now there are several problems with them: they never actually become standard (the draft they are based on was withdrawn); this results in minor incompatibilities

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13820 Bug ID: 13820 Summary: rsync is not preserving ACLs Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net Reporter: dinesh.k at

I hav a problem porting my ACLS from my old filserver to a new one... My old Fileserver: I have my shares on a partition supporting acls with ext3 /dev/md0 on /data/raid type ext3 (rw,acl,user_xattr) My new Fileserver: /dev/md0 on /data/raid type ext4 (rw,acl,user_xattr) Now I copied all my shares to the new Fileserver with rsync and backed up my acls with: getfacl -R

When a directory has a default ACL and a subdirectory is created under that directory, btrfs_init_acl() is called when the subdirectory''s inode is created to initialize the inode''s ACL (inherited from the parent directory) but it was clearing the ACL from the inode after setting it if posix_acl_create() returned success, instead of clearing it only if it returned an error. To

Hello, I am running Fedora Core 2. Kernel: linux-2.6.5-1.358 Kernel supports ACL: [root@atlas configs]# grep FS_SECURITY kernel-2.6.5-i686-smp.config CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_XFS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS_SECURITY=y [root@atlas configs]# grep XATTR kernel-2.6.5-i686-smp.config CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS_XATTR=y Have

Hello Rowland! The users and group are only on the AD, and there are only one entry on each user... In the Windows side all seems ok : but not the result of getfacl ... root at Samba4:/Fichiers# getfacl /Fichiers/SA/Nouveau\ document\ texte.txt getfacl : suppression du premier « / » des noms de chemins absolus # file: Fichiers/SA/Nouveau document texte.txt # owner: ciril # group:

On 03/24/2018 08:20 PM, Ken McDonald via samba wrote: > Can I use a command like this to clone an NT ACL? > > getfattr -n security.NTACL templateFile | sed -e > 's/templateFile/realFile/' | sudo setfattr --restore=- > > I can see that the attribute gets copied over but when I view the ACL > in Windows security tab it's not the same ACL, it's much bigger and