similar to: patch to fix silly bug in 3.0.0beta2

Hi I saw your post about bug in Samba 3.0.1: Quote: ????A lot of people have complained about unreliable connections to W2K and XP machines. The folowing patch solved the problems for us. I have no idea why it works, but after this patch we had no more problems connecting to workstations in the domain. --- samba-3.0.2pre1/source/rpc_parse/parse_net.c 2004-01-06 22:08:41.000000000 +0100 +++

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Robert M. Martel wrote: > I've followed the steps as listed in the manual. Log onto a > windows 2000 client as a user listed as a printer admin. Load the > printer driver and make the changes to reflect installed options on the > printer. Just as listed in section 6.2.2 of the "how-to" manual >

A lot of people have complained about unreliable connections to W2K and XP machines. The folowing patch solved the problems for us. I have no idea why it works, but after this patch we had no more problems connecting to workstations in the domain. --- samba-3.0.2pre1/source/rpc_parse/parse_net.c 2004-01-06 22:08:41.000000000 +0100 +++ samba-3.0.2pre1/source/rpc_parse/parse_net.c 2004-01-07

Hello all. AIX 4.3.3 / Samba 2.0.6 / Production NT4.0 domain Security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = yes update encrypted = yes Action: Moving from NT4.0 domain called nt40 to AD 2000 Domain called ad-domain Problem: Users that have been migrated to ad-domain cannot authenticate to AIX SAMBA shares . . . the AIX SAMBA server is still part of the nt40 domain. Explanation: I can however, map /

Hi, I'm attempting to get my server set up to share out files using Active Directory authentication. I also have winbind set up for shell logins to the server. That part works fine, but when I attempt to connect to a samba share with smbclient, I get rejected with "session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE". I did some searching and found others with similar issues, and I

Hi, First off, I apologize if this email goes through twice. I sent it about an hour ago, but it appears to have never made it to the list, so I'm sending again. I'm attempting to get my server set up to share out files using Active Directory authentication. I also have winbind set up for shell logins to the server. That part works fine, but when I attempt to connect to a samba

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've a machine, and users if granted permission work, but if I grant a group permissions, the user can't get access, even though both winbind and getent report that he is in that group. Examples: [CAD_BU2] ~ comment = CAD_BU ~ path = /mnt/H05/CAD_BU ~ valid users = @THG+mis_group ~ admin users = @THG+mis_group ~

I'm running Samba 2.2.3a on NetBSD. I've been having an annoying problem with winbindd dying inexplicably. I finally found a test that seems to (eventually) kill it: while wbinfo -t > /dev/null; do /usr/bin/true; done The problem is a memory leak in winbindd. Actually, wbinfo -t will still work, but wbinfo -u doesn't (response.extra_data is always null). Is this a known

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, i recently upgraded some of my servers from 3.0.2a to 3.0.4 after the upgrade my browselist shows duplicate entries for the domains. one domains is managed by a samba PDC(providing WINS too) and two samba BDC's. the other domains are managed by one samba PDC. 'smbclient -N -L <WINS_SERVER>' shows: - --- Workgroup

Deja.com with samba groups looks like they don't take me serious...very confusing, then i post my message here hope that someone here can help me. I know that my mail is very long and also my log file but sometime it's necessary voor a good problem solving. I am playing for a few weeks now with linux as a complete newbie (redhat 9.0) with Ldap and Samba 3.0rc1. Problem, i have joined the

I am facing a very strange problem with samba running as PDC and using LDAP. The new users that I create using smbldap-tools aren't able to log in, but they can browse shares on the server. I had the problem with samba 2.2 and hoped it would be solved with 3.0. I spent two days testing without success even with samba 3.0.2pre1. In the log I can't see anything wrong : it says "sam

hi, i got a small problem with the recycle under samba-3.0.0beta2-1 on a redhat 9.0 machine. when i delete file the files move to the recycle bin. when i check the recycle bin all files are in the main directory and not with the directory structure. my /etc/samba/recycle.conf looks so: name = .recycle # mode : # KEEP_DIRECTORIES = retain directory hierarchy of deleted file, #

Denis, I have checked this and verify that this is a bug. You can track the progress towards fixing this from https://bugzilla.samba.org as bug #210. Thanks for the feedback. - John T. On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Denis Heitbrock wrote: > supplement: > [Verkauf] > vfs objects = extd_audit recycle > vfs object = recycle:repository=.recycle recycle:versions=True > recycle:touch=True

Re: Below I am using samba samba-3.0.0beta2-1.i386.rpm I had previously been on the latest redhat version of samba ... I need large file support... Do you know of a patch for the newer sambas or do I have to go backwards? (see reference below) I have a samba-2.2.5-1.i386.rpm but then I have to patch the kernel... redhat have some many kernel patches that this would seem to pose a constant

I was trying to improve the performance of BackupPC http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/, which uses smbclient to connect to Windows systems to backup Windows desktop systems. I'm currently running Samba 2.2.8a on a fairly beefy Solaris 9 system and only getting 200-700 KB/sec from the Windows clients. The 700 KB/sec is when I connect to a dual-Athalon 2600+ Win2K system attached to the

hello list, we're running samba-3.0.0beta2 with ldapsam backend on debian unstable. when contacting the samba server from a nt4 client, windows reports an unexpected network error and samba reports the following internal error: [2003/08/04 13:05:20, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) =============================================================== [2003/08/04 13:05:20, 0]

Hello, I've tried both samba-3.0.0beta2 and beta3 but both give me the same problem. When on a windows dekstop and trying to add a printer with samba as the printserver , the printers exported by the samba server are not seen by the windows "add printer dialogue" e.g.: relevant part of smb.conf: ----------------------------------- load printers = yes printing = cups

Samba 3.0beta2 with ADS support. Said my domain is named "MD" in an Active Directory environment I joined MD, and tested my smb.conf with testparm : # /usr/local/samba/bin/testparm /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf Load smb config files from /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf Processing section "[oneshare]" Processing section "[secshare]" Loaded services file OK.

Firstly, I am running beta2 as AD member. Auth through Winbind. Upgrading from beta1 to beta2 using RPM on RH 9 I noticed that Winbind will not start and smb will not stop using Init scripts. Seems to me RH9 /etc/init.d/winbind need the "winbind uid" parameter ? Here is the /var/log/samba/log.winbind output. [2003/07/04 13:54:52, 1] nsswitch/winbindd.c:main(811) winbindd version

Hi there-- I'm using Debian testing ("Sarge") and recently upgraded to 3.0.0beta2-1 from 2.2. It broke, and I've been pulling my hair our trying to get it working again. I've gone to a Samba HowTo troubleshooting guide: http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/samba/samba-diagnose.html and gotten successfully through test #4 (NetBIOS Name Resolution) but can't get anything on