similar to: Printer Issue over IPSEC VPN

No parameters using DNS. - tinc.conf content Name = sito1 AddressFamily = ipv4 BindToAddress = <IPPUB>:665 BindToInterface = int Device=/dev/net/tun Interface = vpndrif Mode = router PingInterval = 60 PingTimeout = 5 ProcessPriority = normal - host/sito1 content Address = <IPPUB>:665 Subnet = <IPLOCAL>/<NETMASK> Port = 655 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- ... -----END

Hi all, ive been reading lartc howto, im new about traffic shaping/police. As far as red (chapter 9 complete) i saw that first the packet passes at the ingress qdisc, then it passes to the ip stack if the packet is directed to the box or its forwarded (is my case), then it falls to the egress classifier/s. Now, i understand if i have an ipsec vpn at the outside interface, the egress

We are a very small company and moved from WinTel environment to Linux. Killed the WinTel file/print server and implemented SAMBA om Red Hat 7.2. I have some users that need to print to a RICOH Aficio 4106 printer. When I go through the sequence to add printer ...... it appears to install, but the people cannot print. Can anyone walk me through steps as I am novice...... and I do not want to go

Hi everyone, I wrote up a post on the FreeBSD forums about the issue I am having. It's rather long so I am providing a link to it here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=39595 In summary, it seems that when the packets are routed in to the gateway from local network hosts, the src and dst addresses are changed to the public IPs of the tunnel -- at least from the perspective of the

Here's a question that may seem strange. Does the echo canceller maintain some data structure that I might be able to use if I wanted to estimate the amount of delay between the near-end and far-end signals? I'd like to be able to do this in order to optimally align the signals before passing them to the canceller. There seem to be many milliseconds of latency in a Wintel audio subsystem

Hi All, Is anyone of you managed to setup ipsec VPN on Centos4.5 using ipsec-tools-0.3.3-6.rhel4.1 ? Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks yw -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080104/f5d0a3ab/attachment-0003.html>

I am having problems in the implementation of a VPN, below made a project of my net: INTRANET (10.0.0.0/24) | 10.0.0.5 xl0 NetBSD IPNAT ( map wi0 10.0.0.0/24 -> 192.168.213.10 ) wi0 192.168.213.10/30 | | Wireless VPN | | 192.168.213.9/30 xl2 FreeBSD NATD ( divert natd all from any to any ) xl0 200.x.x.5/24 | 200.x.x.1/24

Hi List, What's the best way to create a VPN (IPSec) client-to-site under CentOS 5.4? Thanks in advance. -- Jo?o Salvatti Graduated in Computer Science Federal University of Para - UFPA - Brazil E-Mail: salvatti at gmail.com

Hi all, Any one have success with Openswan and IPSEC VPN? Having some issues. Wondering if any would mind posting there configs; ipsec.conf. Also open to any IPSEC client. - aurf

Sorry Dag, it is possible to use linux as a roadwarrior client: http://www.fw-1.de/aerasec/ng/vpn-racoon/CP-VPN1-NG-Linux-racoon-roadwarrior.html -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS] Connecting CentOS to IPSEC VPN (Checkpoint FW1) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:20:55 +0200 From: carlopmart <carlopmart at gmail.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>

Hi, anybody successfully running win32 client with Cisco vpn client against ipsec-tools? I'm looking for elegantly running VPN road warrior solution. Scenarios are: - ipsec-tools with Cisco vpn client - pptpd with Windows XP native client - OpenVPN with OpenVPN Windows client - ??? Any hints? Thanks for reply. David Hrb??

Anyone know of a client that will allow me to connect a laptop running 4.3 to a checkpoint firewall running an ipsec tunnel? Once i have this working i can say farewell to windows. thanks

Hi All, This is a general VPN question; PPTP VPNs seem to be very easy to set up with CentOS as the VPN server and the built-in windose client, but how do list members feel about the security vunerabilities reported with the MS implementation? Specifically the 6 problems reported here : http://www.schneier.com/pptp-faq.html or maybe im being paranoid? Would any of you roll this solution out

Hi all, Any one use or can recommend a VPN client that works with a Juniper SSG5? - aurf

I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan packages. What is the current consensus w.r.t. building an IPSec VPN "server" (concentrator, whatever) on CentOS 7, that will do site-to-site connections with Cisco hardware at

On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote: > I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there > are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - > Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan packages. libreswan replaced openswan, and is available in the CentOS 7 repo.

On 2015-04-14 11:25, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote: >> I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there >> are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - >> Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan >> packages. > > libreswan replaced openswan, and is

2015-04-14 21:40 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei <florin at andrei.myip.org>: > On 2015-04-14 11:25, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote: >> >>> I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there >>> are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - >>> Openswan, strongSwan, etc.

On 2015-04-14 11:44, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2015-04-14 21:40 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei <florin at andrei.myip.org>: >> >> http://serverfault.com/a/655752/24406 >> >> If that is accurate, the documentation, and the clustering / load >> balancing might tilt the balance in the direction of strongSwan. >> >> > Well, both packages can do ipsec to