similar to: forcing one logon per user

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "forcing one logon per user"

2003 Jun 27
2
Samba 3.0.0 beta
HI, I have a question I recently install samba 3.0.0 beta rpm on Red Hat 9 and I would like to know how can I setup that I can authenticate against AD server? Thanks, Puneet ------------------------------------- Puneet Talwar Unix Administrator 31/3B62 (D) 301-451-9971 (C) 301-252-5366
2003 Jun 27
2
Can't add machine account to domain
I am running samba-2.2.7a-7.9.0 on RedHat 9.0. The domain I am trying to join has a different name than the workgroup I am trying to leave. Below is a copy of the last two entries of the computer_name.log, which are created when I try to add the machine account. [2003/06/27 15:57:24, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_api_samr_create_user(1929) User carroll-313cny4$ does not exist in system
2008 Oct 07
6
How to unsubscribe
I appreciate all the help I received from this Mailing List. However I am receiving work email to my cell phone now and I am being overwhelmed with the mailing list emails. Can some one let me know how to unsubscribe from this mailing list. Thank you -- Jose Mendez Computer Resource Specialist HNRC 619-543-8090
2003 Jun 29
1
Prob configuring Samba / Ldap an PDC
Hy all I installed samba with ldapsam-backand acting as an Windows Server but i was not able to windiws 2k Workstations joining the Domain. I added the Computername with an $ apended to the ldap-passworddir, i let run smbpasswd -m -a elli, but i cannot add the Computer to the Domain. The smb.conf: --- cut --- [global] workgroup = EINSLE netbios name = SRV01 server string = %h
2003 Jun 27
1
samba not working with ldap
hello list, I'm trying to configure my samba server to work with ldap , but it seems that samba cannot understand the ldap options in the configuration file , when I run testparm, I am sur that I installed samba -with-ldapsam option , and I can find these options in the man page of smb.conf , so I wamder what can the problem be , any suggestions please
2003 Jun 30
1
WinXP samba2.2.8a joining domain trouble
Dear sirs, When I try to join my domain I get the error message "The specified network password is not correct" When I use a knowingly wrong password I get an error message in style with "Unkown user or incorrect password" I have set registry keys [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters] "requiresignorseal"=dword:00000000
2008 Sep 18
2
Network issues with CentOS 5.2
I am totally new to using CentOS. Linux in Genera really. I have decent experiencing with terminal code for Macs though. Here's the deal my Boss wants us to move more toward linux for some of our basic users. All I was supposed to do was install CentOS 5.2 and Open Office and disburse the machines. Simple enough right. So I did this with no issue. I ran the interface and installed only
2003 Jul 10
1
forcing log off
okay so i have the script provided by joel. i have changed them slitely so that each user gets his or her own file, because if two users try to log on at the same time, the script can't differentiate between atempts. so you get mixed lines. as in user1 starts with line1 but then user2 might have his first line right after. we wanted to be able to distinguish. now that we can see who is
2003 Jun 23
0
AW: LDAP + SAMBA...about to give up...
I think "root" and/or the SID 1000/1001 is the problem. Try to use the LDAP-User "administrator" with SambaSID = S-1-5-...-500 and SambaPrimaryGroupSID = S-1-5-...-512. Hubertus -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: tpham@viettre.net [mailto:tpham@viettre.net] Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juni 2003 16:19 An: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: [Samba] LDAP + SAMBA...about to give up...
2015 Jan 11
4
Help with IPv6 /48 block
El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribi?: > On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >> We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have >> all IPv6s available for usage. > > Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresses? thats > 1,208,925,819,614,629,200,000,000 individual IPs ? > > Or, its 65536 /64 subnets of
2015 Jan 10
4
Help with IPv6 /48 block
El 10/01/2015 a las 03:40 p.m., Gordon Messmer escribi?: > On 01/10/2015 10:10 AM, F. Mendez wrote: >> >> But of course I am assuming that like in IPv4 IPADDR_START/END is >> implemented. > > I don't think so. The START and END bits of ifup-aliases appear to be > v4 specific. > >> Please give some guidance as I need this to done already and the hole
2015 Jan 10
3
Help with IPv6 /48 block
Hello. It happens that at the company I'm working decided to start migration of IPs tech. So they got a /48 block. I were trying to add it with: ifcfg-eth0-range1 (0 is already in use with IPv4 range): IPV6ADDR_START=xxxx IPV6ADDR_END=xxxx CLONENUM_START=0 But of course I am assuming that like in IPv4 IPADDR_START/END is implemented. Please give some guidance as I need this to done
2006 Oct 09
1
Question regarding ZFS
Hi gurus, I was playing with zfs in a V890 before it was installed for production. We reinstalled it for production, but the 4 disks We used to play with zfs have a non standard format (slices comes from s0 to s8 not s2 for backup s7 does not exists) We need to recover those 4 disks to be used by Solaris Volume Manager. I know this would be an easy question, but I was trying to fix it
2006 Oct 06
12
Two outbound internet links, using one network interface
Hi, I am trying to categorize the network traffic and to send it out across two different providers. For this I mark the packets in the firewall (in the PREROUTING chain of table mangle), and then use another routing table for the marked packets, which has a different gateway from the main routing table. Basicaly I am following the cookbook example in this page:
2002 Jan 17
3
SAMBA and Active Directory
Im using winbind to extract all the users, this works, but assoon as I want to change pam to authenticate using the winbind pam module It doesn't authenticate, can someone who has done this please send me there pam login file as well as there pam samba file Thanks Andrew -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
2005 Nov 21
3
roaming profiles, not roaming
using samba v3 windows xp sp2 clients. i have profiles working to some extent, that is when i create a new user on the server, when that user logs in, the profile gets downloaded from the server from the /etc/netlogon/default user directory. any customizations that the user makes work just fine and get saved to the profiles share under profiles/username when the user tries to go to a different
2007 May 18
3
samba, wins, netbios
I am trying to setup the samba server to ping machines on the network via the netbios name. i have the following lines in smb.conf under global wins support = yes domain logons = Yes preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes local master = yes os level = 34 my /etc/nsswitch.conf looks like. hosts: files wins dns I added the address of the samba server into the wins configuration tab
2015 Jan 11
1
Help with IPv6 /48 block
El 10/01/2015 a las 11:41 p.m., John R Pierce escribi?: > On 1/10/2015 8:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >> El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribi?: >>> On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >>>> We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have >>>> all IPv6s available for usage. >>> >>> Do you realize that a
2003 May 22
1
perl(Net::LDAP::LDIF) is needed by samba-3.0alpha24-1
Hi, I downloaded samba as binary package for redhat 9 I tried to install it on a test workstation where all redhat 9 packages are installed (with the adition xfs from sgi). Apt-get couldn't solve this dependencies and rpmfind.net freshrpms.net also not. Warnung: samba-3.0alpha24-1.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 2f87af6f Fehler: Failed dependencies: perl(Net::LDAP::LDIF)
2015 Jan 11
1
Help with IPv6 /48 block
On 1/10/2015 8:38 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/10/2015 08:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >> Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my >> work...). > > It's not crazy, that's the standard deployment for a building. It's > almost certainly not possible to use all of the addresses in such a > space, but that's the point. IPv6 is