similar to: Ghost Create account: procedure number out of range in Samba

Hi all... Has anyone got SWAT administration working from other userid's other than root? I've got a rh6.2 box running Samba 2.0.7. I have myself (wkim) in the "domain admin users" and the "admin users". Both the smb.conf file and the swat binarary are owned by root:swat. I'm a part of group "swat". (I'm also a part of group "root" just to

hello I tried to compile samba on Redhat AS5U5 but it fails with this message: Install: cannot stat `source3/bin/umount.cifs': No such file or directory. Any solution? kind regards werner maes

hello I've been reading the thread (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=113286376900001&r=1&w=2) and I have the same limitation with WINS in a PDC/BDC. That's why I have the following (experimental) setup: PDC ==> wins support = yes, passdb backend: master ldap BDC ==> wins support = yes, passdb backend: slave ldap I configured some of my XP clients to use both WINS servers

hello when I try to compile samba-3.4.x on RHEL4 with the samba.spec in the packaging folder I always get this error: Compiling ../lib/talloc/talloc.c ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:50:21: replace.h: No such file or directory ../lib/talloc/talloc.c: In function `_talloc_realloc': ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:987: error: `bool' undeclared (first use in this function) ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:987: error:

Hello, I think (in fact I'm quite sure) I have found the following bug in Swat. In my configuration I use the global option "invalid users=@class". When I set this option using SWAT, all works fine after "commit changes". Users who belong to the "class" group cannot access the server. But when I erase this value using SWAT and do "commit changes",

Hello, Im using Samba and LDAP together and if I use the scriptPath attribute for a user defined in LDAP, it seems that variable substitions no longer work like they did when you're using the global logon script parameter in smb.conf. example: scriptPath = scripts\%m.bat ==> %m.bat is NOT substituted to machinename.bat Because the "logon scripts" directive of smb.conf will

hello Although https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6721 has status RESOLVED, I still get an error when trying to compile samba-3.4.2 on RHEL5. The following command failed: gcc -O2 -g -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c ../lib/replace/getpass.c -o ../lib/replace/getpass.o make: *** [../lib/replace/snprintf.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make: ***

Hello, Can anyone give me arguments that could convince someone to choose for Samba for file and print sharing instead of setting up a NT-server? Performance ? Stability ? Benchmarks ? Tests that someone has done? Things like: "It's free" or "You don't need a powerful machine" are irrelevant to our administrators. I'm looking for answers on questions like:

hello I'm having the following problem: On a share I have a user with read-only access to word files. Another user has read-write access to these files. When the user with read-only access opens a word file and then the user with read-write access to these files opens the file, the read-write user has only read-only access. If the read-write user opens the word file first, then he has

Tdb files... /var/cache/samba/ ~ Daniel > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Gapinski [mailto:dan.gapinski@qsi-r2.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:02 PM > To: Lista Samba > Subject: [Samba] Moving Samba to a different Linux server. > > > Hello, > > I am looking for a second opinion. When moving a Samba PDC > service to a > different Linux

Hi All! Thanks to all of you that responded to my previous posts. I've gotten a lot more info now than I used to have! But I still have questions. The biggest right now is: Is there a way build up a Samba PDC as a direct replacement for an existing Windows NT 4.0 PDC? All the material I've found to date is written from a standpoint of creating a new domain as you create the Samba

Hello, I need an answer to the following problem: I have a Samba server with domain logons enabled and with encrypt passwords=no. So I don't use the smbpasswd file, only the Unix password files. When I try to logon with a Win95 client (client for Microsoft Networks, logging on to a domain), people with mixed-case passwords cannot logon to the Samba logon server. Those with a password in

add to each share writeable = yes or read-only = no This Helps! Rauno -----Original Message----- From: werner maes [mailto:werner.maes@cc.kuleuven.ac.be] Sent: 11. mai 2004. a. 16:19 To: samba@samba.org Subject: [Samba] BUG: Vfs audit module & samba 3.0.4 ==> share unaccessible Hello Maybe there's a bug in samba-3.0.4. The following configuration does NO longer work. It did

This (see below) is what I found in the Samba Introduction Document. Can anyone tell me where I can find the Ziff-Davis benchmark tests? Thanks a lot, Werner Maes KULeuven "The Present Samba 2.0 was released in January 1999. One of the most significant and cool features of the 2.0 release was improved speed. Ziff-Davis Publishing used their Netbench software to benchmark Samba 2.0 on

this is my output when I try to compile samba-3.5.2 using the spec file provided in the samba packages: Linking bin/smbclient /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `PC' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tgetflag' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined

At 15:58 00-04-17, you wrote: >Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:45:07 +0200 >From: werner maes <werner.maes@cc.kuleuven.ac.be> >To: samba@samba.org >Subject: SMBD-error: important?? >Message-ID: <38FB0753.B00F2E49@cc.kuleuven.ac.be> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Hello, > >When I

Hello, When I open a text file on a Samba fileserver using LDAP for authentication, Samba always makes these LDAP calls (see below). The user has been authenticated so why does Samba still makes these LDAP connections? Any ideas? /var/log/ldap.log when opening a text file. ldap-hh slapd[22940]: conn=3922 op=19 SRCH base="o=kuleuven,c=be" scope=2 filter="(uid=m2000944)"

Hello, Concerning the upcoming 2.2.3 release of Samba with LDAP support. Question 1: Is it possible that you define multiple ldap servers in the option "ldap server ="? In the event that one LDAP server is down, the next LDAP server defined can take over. If not, no authentication is possible if the LDAP server is not available? Question 2: Is there any fallback possible to a

I've got one user that I just put onto the new Samba 3.0.8 server. He's on WinXP SP1. He has a ton of icons and things on his desktop (39M worth of data according to his profile) but I'm not sure if that is a problem. When he logs in, a few of his icons which point to network applications have only the default Windows shortcut image. If he right-clicks the Desktop and clicks

Hello, I have defined 20.000 users on a Samba-server. The samba-server takes care of domain logons. When several users try to authenticate at THE SAME time the server can't follow: only the first users can succesfully logon. When they don't logon simultaneously there's no problem. For example: 20 users log on at exactly the same time. This situation occurs in our pc-rooms when