similar to: udp 137/138 vs tcp 139

Hi everybody, i'm interested in forcing users to login only to certain machines. I saw in the output of pdbedit -Lv the voice "Workstations:", but i can't find a command to change this value... is it what i need? Is it there for future use? Thanks Matteo

Hi all, I have shorewall up and running on my system. (GNU-Linux Mandrake 9) When I tested my firewall at grc.com, Shields-Up informs me that ports 113 and 135 are closed and not ''stealthed'' When reading the faq on the Shorewall site I saw that shorewall rejects rather than denys connection requests on ''TCP ports 113, 135, 137 and 139 as well as UDP ports

Hi! I am trying to implement va_arg() on ppc32. Everything went smooth, except implementing va_arg() of 64bit int. Since i64 is not a legal type on ppc32 DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandRes_VAARG() splits the va_arg(i64) into two i32 va_args. The problem with ppc32 va_arg is that it needs special "alignment" of its gpr pointer when the argument is i64. Ie. I need to know if I am lowering

Hello, First of all, i am new at the list and i have several questions about ocfs2 performance. Where i am working i am having huge performance problens with ocfs2. Let me tell my envoriment. 3 Xen VirtualMachines withs ocfs2 mounting an LUN exported over iSCSI. ( acctualy 3 LUNS, 3 ocfs2 clusters ) I am not the one who configured the envoriment, but it is making the performance of my MAIL

Is it possible to debug selected client only? because enabling debug globaly on production machine will fill up log directory within minutes. posibly something like: debug peer = ip_address_of_client

Hi. I've tried GTA3 on wine with the kernel 2.6-test10 and I've found it a lot faster than with the 2.4.22. The problem is that the games is very fast but it's not smooth, once a second it'll block for some millseconds but this not happen always and not with the same frequency... this happens the same with or without kernel preemption. After some tryes I've discovered that

I wish to perform brain surgery this afternoon at 4pm and don't know where to start. My background is the history of great statistician sports legends but I am willing to learn. I know there are courses and numerous books on brain surgery but I don't have the time for those. Please direct me to the appropriate HowTos, and be on standby for solving any problem I may encounter while

Implement reference counting for struct drm_gpuvm. Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c | 20 ++++++--- include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h | 31 +++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c

Hallo, after change net-infrastructure on a multinetwork-server can on segment not find the logon-server. Source problem is, that nmbd sending UDP/138 answers from a false IP. 12:08:08.909997 IP 123.4.5.6.138 > 123.4.7.7.138: NBT UDP PACKET(138) 12:08:08.910083 IP 10.9.0.1.138 > 123.4.5.5.138: NBT UDP PACKET(138) UDP/137 and all TCP-traffic are O.K. My server has two active netcards for

Hallo, after change net-infrastructure on a multinetwork-server can on segment not find the logon-server. Source problem is, that nmbd sending UDP/138 answers from a false IP. 12:08:08.909997 IP 123.4.5.6.138 > 123.4.7.7.138: NBT UDP PACKET(138) 12:08:08.910083 IP 10.9.0.1.138 > 123.4.5.5.138: NBT UDP PACKET(138) UDP/137 and all TCP-traffic are O.K. My server has two active netcards for

I have strange uid/gid problem. I am testing Samba 3-beta1 and Samba is ADS member to W2003 server. Everythings work, wbinfo, getent passwd and so on. Now to the problem: When I list the users with getent passwd I get: Administrator:x:10000:10000:Administrator:/global/mnt1/SAMBA/home/TEST.SE/administrator:/bin/sh Guest:x:10001:10002:Guest:/global/mnt1/SAMBA/home/TEST.SE/guest:/bin/sh

Sorry forgot the subject, Evolution dumped on me in the middle of composing the first time round. I'm getting the following errors. How do I get rid of the max on session IDs? [2001/12/03 09:11:00, 1] smbd/session.c:session_claim(88) session_claim: out of session IDs (max is 3000) [2001/12/03 09:11:00, 1] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(316) Failed to claim session for vuid=100

Hello, Two questions for you this evening. How do you tell the difference between NTLMv1-style authentication and NTLMv2 style? The CIFS dialect NT LM 0.12 does both(?), so does not appear in the NegProtRequest message (nor in the flags, near as I could tell). Do you ascertain this by examining the SessionSetupAndX message? If so, what parts? Is it possible to have more than one CIFS

I tought Virtual Network Interfaces excuse.. Three is not enough for my application and I don''t have NIC... Will this limitation increase? And what about RAM overcomittment? Is it possible? Le 27 sept. 06 à 18:39, Henning Sprang a écrit : Hi, On 9/27/06, The MoonSeeker <themoonseeker@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I''d like to know how many interfaces can we create for a domU?

I have Samba4 4.1.14 (built from sources) installed at Ubuntu 14.04 LTS x32 and acting as Standalone server at the time. Here are 3 faces at Ubuntu: lo, lan and wan. There are lines: bind interfaces only = yes interfaces = lo lan0 in smb.conf But netstat -tulpn shows 0.0.0.0 binded address: tcp 0 0 192.168.0.254:139 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN smbd udp 0 0

I have founded that 0.0.0.0:port could be "closed" by setting up socket address = wishing IP addresses, for example socket address = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.254 2015-01-11 17:46 GMT+03:00 CpServiceSPb . <cpservicespb at gmail.com>: > Thanks for this answer. > As I understood, for example if parameter > bind interfaces only = yes is and > interfaces = lan0 (192.168.0.254)

Rowland, as I you mentioned firstly, I have 3 faces: lo, lan, wan. And you are right, 0.0.0.0 are all IPs. I need only either listen to lo and lan or lan only, but not wan also. But in my case and because of 0.0.0.0 are all faces, listening 0.0.0.0 doesn' t equal lo and lan (127.0.0.1 and 192.168.0.254) . Yes, there is no 95.95.95.14 in netstat list, but 0.0.0.0 should cover and 95.95.95.14

I have a samba winbind server which is operating properly. I have the firewall configured to DROP outbound traffic on UDP/137 and 139. The broadcast traffic on these ports will not reach any pertinent machines due to subnetting, and is unwanted traffic. The server is working without this traffic hitting the network. However, Winbindd is constantly trying to broadcast and logging that it

Hello, A little informal input on the TCP/UDP checksum deferral/offload: it fails for me. I have one Xen host, running a snapshot of xen-unstable at 2006-03-24 (9435:11fee62328cc). Each of its domUs are allocated their own /30, with the help of a hacked-up vif script. Prior to working around the problem, Domain-0 could establish TCP connections to other domains. In the case of SSH, it would

Hmmm, I founded some at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2012-July/085752.html As I saw these patches was already implemented. But is it possible to receive broadcast not to 0.0.0.0 but to x.y.z.255 ? This is network broadcast either. And opened 0.0.0.0 even with checking of source net is quite insecure from net security point of view. I think so. May be is it necessary to add