similar to: Samba + OpenBSD VPN

Hi! There is a little problem in the security/isakmpd port. There are some gen*.sh scripts in it, which generate some C header (and src) files. These scripts are using awk, tr, etc - some generic UNIX tools. One of the tools has problems with some localisations, so these scripts generate incorrect C-code. Eg, I have Hungarian localisation set, so I have the following in my environ:

Hi, I have a rekeying problem between FreeBSD4.9 (running isakmpd) and a Cisco 7000 box. The rekeying time of these two are not same, so even they new SAs are created on isakmpd side, the tunnel doesn't work at all. On isakmpd side, I know it creates new SA when SA life time passes 90%. But I don't know when Cisco builds the new SAs. I don't have much knowledge on Cisco and I cannot

Hi all! I''ve got 2 (soon 3) internet connection. 1 - via ADSL, 2(and3) via ppp My network: http://desima.objectis.net/network-diag linux1: user1.user2 eth0=192.168.1.1 ppp0=192.168.5.2( gw 192.168.5.1) gw=192.168.1.2 ( thru ADSL) compA=192.168.1.6 compB=192.168.1.15 gw2=192.168.1.217 via ppp to different ISP All works for compA and CompB, user1 should use default gw(192.168.1.2)

We're running Samba 2.2.2 on an S/390 mainframe and have been experiencing problems with Samba seeming to access an invalid memory location. Below is part of the message log: Feb 15 10:48:38 linux1 kernel: VM_GROWSDOWN not set, but address 0 Feb 15 10:48:38 linux1 kernel: not in vma 0106a960 (start 400000 end 53A000) Feb 15 10:48:38 linux1 kernel: User process fault:

I have noticed an inconsistency with the behavior of linux smbfs mounting a remote win2k server while a file is open for writing: 1) If a linux process opens a file that /doesn't exist/ on the win2k server, while the file is open, other machines trying to read the file give the usual 'Text file is busy' (linux) or 'file is in use by another process'

more messages in the other node of the cluster.../var/log/messages. ======== Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 Node Manager 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:42 EDT 2005 (build 82257c19fee200eff2ba31569613b46a) Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 DLM 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:43 EDT 2005

more messages in the other node of the cluster.../var/log/messages. ======== Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 Node Manager 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:42 EDT 2005 (build 82257c19fee200eff2ba31569613b46a) Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 DLM 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:43 EDT 2005

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SN-02:05 Security Notice The FreeBSD Project Topic: security issues in ports Announced: 2002-08-28 I. Introduction Several ports in the FreeBSD Ports

Hi All, I'm trying to reproduce a failure on llvm-ppc64-linux1 (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc64-linux1/builds/5382) and llvm-ppc64-linux2 builders caused by one of my patches yesterday. Some of the CodeGen/Hexagon tests failed to compile with stack dump problem. I tried to configure and build LLVM for PowerPC on my machine locally but don't see the failures. I had to remove

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Janos Mohacsi >Organization: NIIF/HUNGARNET >Confidential: no >Synopsis: pf does not use IPv6 interface addresses at startups >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Category: bin >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD scone.ki.iif.hu 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #23: Wed May 9 18:23:24

I'm trying to understand why the buildbot sanitizer-ppc64-linux1 fails due to my latest patch. It was in llvm::GlobalValue while the reported failure is: strcspn-2.c.tmp: /home/buildbots/sanitizerslave1/sanitizer-ppc64-1/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/strcspn-2.c:17: int main(int, char **): Assertion `r == sizeof(s1) - 1' failed. where strcspn-2.c (below) tests the

list: cvsuped and build world failed today on pflogd. cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-uninitialized -Wstrict-prototypes -I/usr/src/sbin/pfctl/../../contrib/pf/pfctl -DENABLE_ALTQ -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c /usr/src/sbin/pfctl/../../contrib/pf/pfctl/pfctl_radix.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes

Hi list, This is driving me to distraction. I have installed the 3.0.14a RPMS on SLES8, and am following chapter 9 of the 'By Example' documentation, to migrate from an NT domain to a Samba domain backed by LDAP. I have followed the instructions up to the point where I enter: net rpc join -S pdc_it -U Administrator%password Unfortunately, this responds with: Creation of workstation

I have tried Samba 3.0.2a and 3.0.4. We use Active directory. The server is running on RHEL3. When I connect to the server on a share that is acutally an ext3 or NFS file system, I have no known problems. We use ClearCase on Linux and I am trying to access my workspace (view) as I have done many times before on Solaris, but now we are running on Linux and with a newer version of ClearCase

My dom0 is uing Centos 5.2 x64. I have just upgraded Xen from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1. After upgraded, I find that I cannot hotplug additional vcpu anymore. I have a domU "linux1" which is a paravirtualized vm with centos 5.2. I try to "xm vcpu-set linux1 4", it does not have any error message, but those vcpu cannot be displayed. I also tried to add vcpu using "virsh setvcpus

I am using the 'backup to a central backup server with 7 day incremental' example to archive three separate computers to identically configured (apart from name) shares on a Western Digital 'MyBookLive' NAS which has rsync enabled. The backup from two Raspberry Pi Computers operates without a problem but the backup from a Fedora 32 computer fails with an 'unknown module

Hey. I seem to have the strangest problem with samba. I have been running samba on a total of four machine, without a problem. Now with a new machine, it won't work. UNLESS I set loglevel to 10 in smb.conf, now thats weird. If I remove the loglevel parameter from the smb.conf (so it reverts to default, what.. 5 ?) it crashes after just a minute or so of use. Here is first a log from the

When a certain user tries to access shared folder provided by Samba, his account is always locked. I can't figure out where the problem is. Please help. --Masahiko Detail: We're using Active Directory by Windows 2000 Servers and use it for samba's authentication. When a certain domain user, say, MYDOMAIN\user1, tries to access to the remote resource \\LINUX1\user1 on a Linux server

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=443 Summary: 2.6 kernel failing in NAT with significant outbound traffic Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo:

This long running bot failed on a unused variable warning. Given that several other bots cover the warnings, any chance we could get this one configured to not fail the build on warnings? Doing so would make it more likely to actually get to the "sanitizer" part of the testing process. Philip -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on