similar to: ext3fs: Bad super block

What are the R equivalents to the Stata command egen tag and egen count? egen station_week_tag = tag(station week) Thank you

Didn't hear back from anyone regarding if there is a way to determine if I am running the ext3fs with htree. Is there a way I can do it without checking the src code since I am running the precompired redhat kernel with 8.0? Perhaps an entry under /proc somewhere? Pj -----Original Message----- From: Parker Johnson Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:34 PM To: 'Andreas Dilger';

Good evening. We have some heavy-loaded servers on ext2, and we want to migrate to ext3fs. But we need full and stable quota support. I have headrd that there are some problems in quota usage under ext3fs. Is it true? Should we decline the ext3 usage as impossible in our servers? We need high-level stability in our server (hosting). Thanks before. -- Best regards,

I'm NOT the authority here, but AFAIK, Htree is presently available only as a patch for 2.4 kernels (which includes RH8). I think that Htree was still beta code at the time RH8 was frozen (and may still be, from RedHat's perspective). I do not have the impression that the Htree patch has been applied in any standard RedHat kernels or kernel updates. I hope I am wrong, and that

Hi, I've got a Redhat 7.2 system: Celeron 400 512MB RAM 18GB SCSI HD (/boot (ext2fs), / (ext3fs)) 40GB IDE HD (/ (ext3fs)) I run a bunch of services on the box (apache + mod_perl, MYSQL, Samba, etc) but the system is not under heavy load. This system has performance issues reading/writing to the ext3fs filesystems. The performance issues cropped up when I installed Redhat 7.2. Previously

Andreas was kind enough to point out that not neccesarily all ext3fs have htrees ready to go. I am running redhat8.0 out of the box. How can I check if ext3fs with htrees is running? I can download the kernel source, but I don't know what options were used when it was built by redhat. Thanks much for all of your help. -Parker -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Dilger

I am trying to determine the optimal filesystem for accessing large numbers of files (25,000+) in a single directory. I have read that ext3fs uses a sequential search algorithm and wanted to verify that this was still indeed the case since this article was published a year ago. http://bulmalug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=1154 <http://bulmalug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=1154&nIdPage=7>

Hi, I have ext3 installed against the 2.2.19 kernel. I am able to make the ext3 file system and mount it. I am not able to install the ext3fs for kernel-2.4.5 . I am unable to add the ext3 patch to the kernel. In the directory ~andrewm/linux/ext3/, which is the patch for 2.4.5 kernel. ( I can only see the patches for 2.4.6 and 2.4.7 ). Also, is there any prescribed pattern for

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5637 Summary: Match case issue on ext3fs and ARM platform Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: bugzilla@substring.ch

Does redhat 9 come with htree optimizations for ext3fs?

Bummer. Does anyone have a url that describes the 2.4 patching process? Any claims on stability? Thanks, Parker -----Original Message----- From: 'Andreas Dilger' [mailto:adilger@clusterfs.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:35 PM To: Parker Johnson Cc: 'ext3-users@redhat.com'; Ops Subject: Re: ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in director ies? On Jan 15,

Hello, does anybody know if there is an ext3fs patch for kernel 2.4.2-2 that is shipped with redhat 7.1? I was abel to fins patches only for 2.4.6 and 2.4.7. Please try to help ASAP. Best regards, Imad Ossaily.

Hi, I'm trying to figure out how stable the ex3fs currently is. I'm running Debian Woody with the 2.4.18 kernel and have already switched over most partitions to have a journal, and mounted them as ext3. This works fine since yesterday or so, and it's very nice that ext3 is so easy to handle and can be activated so painlessly :) But is it a good idea to switch my /home partition over

Hi all! It seems the current ext3 code has some problems; my machine is running 2.4.6-ac1 with ext3-0.9 patches on top of it. This afternoon, I was doing some testing of a little piece of code on my machine, and I was able to crash it. What this program does is, in effect something like (pseudo-code) for(i=0; i<100; i++) { fd=creat file-i truncate fd, 50M mmap fd close fd fill the

First off, thanks! :) It appears that the issue could be a bad switch. At this time, I have turned down the server's NIC to run at 10baseT-FD and the performance has seriously increased. It now takes roughly 25 to 35 seconds to copy and 8mb file to the server, but it now takes a little longer to copy a file from the server. So, we are now in the market for some far superior network

Good morning, I have tried to compile a 2.4.14 kernel (because I have some trouble with the framebuffer and my Toshiba...). Thus, I have downloaded the latest kernel and the ext3 patch. I have used the .config file used for the compilation of my 2.4.13 kernel, but the compilation ends with make[1]: Quitte le répertoire `/usr/src/linux-2.4.14/arch/i386/lib' ld -m elf_i386 -T

This maybe early, but is there an ext3fs patch for the 2.4.16 kernel -- also, in general where does one download the lastest ext3fs patches?? I found the 2.4.14 patch a few weeks ago on in the linux.org UK site, but all the patches appear to be taken off that site...Any help would be most appreciated... Thanks, Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------

I have an existing hard drive that I would like to partition for ext3fs then utilize for backing up data files from a new machine. My problem is that this HDD has a full version of FC4, and if I have it switched on when connected by external USB when booting the new system, it will hang the process. New equipment is SATA with recent version of FC5; No problem when running by itself. I just

hiya! see the attached file for the resolved bug() call. my kernel spit out 185 messages like this: Mar 9 17:15:13 srck@trottelkunde attempt to access beyond end of device Mar 9 17:15:13 srck@trottelkunde 16:42: rw=0, want=0, limit=12289725 right before the bug(). this message didn't get parsed by ksymoops Mar 9 17:15:13 srck@trottelkunde Assertion failure in journal_start() at

Hello All, I have been doing some research to find a method to increase the performance of writes to the hard drives in my servers. I am running Samba and all writes to the server hard drives are taking at least 3 to 10 times (It varies) the amount of time it took to write such files on our older Windows NT 4.0 File Server. The following information is provided to keep this issue on track...