similar to: Problem: Copying large amount of files to SAMBA Server. W2KError "file in use" for exe files

Hi all, first i want to say a big "Hello" to the list, since this is my first posting here. Yesterday i just installed another SAMBA server on a middle class (K6-2 500, 128MB) machine. All shares are accessable like expected but i often get an "Can't move file. File in use." error from my W2K client when moving large amount of files to the SAMBA server. This error

Hi Folks. I'm trying to setup Samba and having a bit of a problem... However, I'm not sure if it's a Samba issue, or NFS issue. The setup is as follows: Server 1 --> exports /storage/ftpusers In that folder, there are numerous user folders that are owned by each specific user. Server 2 --> nfs mounts server1:/storage/ftpusers as /mnt/ftpusers At the

Is this simply impossible? No one's replied, or suggested another alternative... Am I asking on the wrong list perhaps? -- A -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Samba] Help with permissions Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:47:24 -0600 From: Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley@pcraft.com> To: samba@lists.samba.org Hi Folks. I'm trying to setup Samba and having a bit of a

Hi ALL I'm using vsftpd as FTP server, and I'd like to chroot my FTP users to their home dir. How can I do it? i.e. "jailing" them in their home dir... at the moment I have the following issues the user when they login to ftp server they go to the main directory /var/ftp/ /etc/passwd ... sdc:x:501:501::/var/ftp/sdc:/bin/bash ase:x:502:501::/var/ftp/ase:/bin/bash

doveconf -n: # 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-042stab116.1 x86_64 Debian 8.6 mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent }

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1284 Michael Felt <aixtools at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aixtools at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Felt <aixtools at gmail.com> --- Just thought it could be

Hi Everyone! Just to let you know, I am very happy ext3 made it thorugh to linux kernel 2.4.15 We have installed ext3 on several machines here at jtrix.org (including two laptops) and everything seems to be working fine. Our only concern is for our two public servers. They run linux 2.2.19 for stability reasons. On one of the laptops (dual booting 2.2.19 and 2.4.14) kernel 2.2.19 failed to

Hi folks, After some more trial and error, I was able to get a bit further in the game with the permission issues I had (previous message was titled 'Samba permissions...) Now I'm able to get onto the system, browse and read/copy/delete files off of the shares. What I can't do is put stuff on because I get a locking error. The setup is as follows: Server 1 -->

Thanks to everyone who has replied to my emails so far - to summarise: AIX allows setting of rlogin=false and and a su group, or a list of users that are permitted to "su" to root. ( or other functional ids ) This means with entries in /etc/ftpusers, it is possible to : 1/ Track who used root via sulog and or external logging 2/ Protect root even if the root password is compromised 3/

Leaving the body of the method the same as the default still throws the "stack level too deep" error. As a matter of fact, it only disappears if I comment out the ''require'' in line 1. As it turned out, it was the method definiton itself that caused problems. Ruby doesn''t have keyword arguments, but I tried calling the method as if it had. But when I changed

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.61 Severity: wishlist File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/proftpd Two weeks ago, I got a rush of these: Sep 8 12:37:07 goretex proftpd: PAM-listfile: Refused user news for service proftpd (Apparently, fail2ban managed to miss those.) This is triggered by pam_listfile, which is used by proftpd (and other FTP daemons) to block users listed in

I have 1 Centos server V4.x already running VSFTPD and when the user logs in they get chrooted to the home directory, I have installed the same config files to a second server (again Centos V4.x) and have setup the same user on the second server but the user does not get chrooted to the home directory but is placed in /var/ftp/pub and cannot upload file. The files I copied are:-

Hello, what are they meaning? It could be something that would show a threshhold above which the result is indicating different meanings then just random noise. But there is no description on the definition of those lines, so it means nothing, if it is not clearly defined. Where can I find a detailed definiton? Ciao, Oliver

Hi folks, I can't seem to log into my system via vsftpd. All other services using PAM are fine...Am I missing something simple? ftp> user (username) user 331 Please specify the password. Password: 530 Login incorrect. # getenforce Permissive here is the event in /var/log/audit/audit.log: type=USER_AUTH msg=audit(1247235151.569:9781): user pid=21052 uid=0 auid=0

> On Apr 5, 2018, at 2:00 PM, g l <gnulinux at gmx.com> wrote: > >> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 at 4:40 PM >> From: "Jeff Newmiller" <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> >> >> the coef function. >> > > For the benefit of other novices, used the following command to read the documentation: > > ?coef > > Then tried and

> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 at 5:55 AM > From: "David Winsemius" <dwinsemius at comcast.net> > > > Not correct. You already have `predict`. It is capale of using the `newdata` values to do interpolation with the values of the coefficients in the model. See: > > ?predict > The ? details did not mention interpolation explicity; thanks. > The

Hello everyone, I have been given the task of working out a number of issues with OpenSSH for my company (Hertz). I have been following the mailing list for several days now and I'm beginning to compile a list of who is working on what. To make my task faster, it would nice if the people working on the following issues would drop me a email before I start to rewrite their code and get it

> On Apr 6, 2018, at 3:43 AM, g l <gnulinux at gmx.com> wrote: > >> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 at 5:55 AM >> From: "David Winsemius" <dwinsemius at comcast.net> >> >> >> Not correct. You already have `predict`. It is capale of using the `newdata` values to do interpolation with the values of the coefficients in the model. See:

We use samba 2.2.9 with winbind. We use winbind for authentication. I was able to selectively limit pop3 use among winbind users on redhat 9 with this pam configuration. (As you would use it in ftpusers, in the reverse sense.) auth required /lib/security/pam_listfile.so item=user onerr=fail sense=allow file=/etc/pop3users This is the best solution for my situation, and I want to have that on my

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1284 --- Comment #2 from Michael Felt <aixtools at gmail.com> --- p.s. re: sftp ignoring /etc/ftpusers. Question: is this by design? If not, is this something unexpected for all systems? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.