similar to: WINT-NT is working as PDC and Redhat Linux Samba BDC and how to use rsync?

Hi I havee been trying to setup my Redhat 8.0 Linux as BDC, i have NT4 as my PDC. My smb.conf [global] workgroup=ITERNAL netbios name=TRIC server string=server Samba load printers=no printcap name=cups printing=cups print command=lp -d %p %s; rm %s invalid users=root log file=/var/log/samba/log.%m max log size=1000 syslog=0 smbpasswd file=/etc/samba/smbpasswd security=DOMAIN encrypt

Hi I have Redhat 9. To download latest samba i went to the following site:- http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/RedHat/RPMS/i386/9.0/ i can see only one samba RPM what about samba-common & samba-client? Are these 2 built into samba or we have to do build this As i know earlier we used to have 3 RPMS 1.Samba-common 2 Samba 3.Samba-client with Best Regards ys

Hi I am using samba-3.0.0beta3-1.i386.rpm on RedHat 9... trying to migrate from NT4 PDC to Samba PDC... reading the HOW-TO document at step 6 whioch is net rpc vampire... Unsuccessfull... when i do #net rpc vampire -S NTSERVER -U Administrator%password All NT users are created in /etc/passwd file and also home directories created without any problem..but only few user entries are created in

Hi All I have setup Samba-3.0-beta as PDC for Windows Network.. Users can login from client computers to Samba Server..everything fine. Actually i used migration process from NT to Samba using latest HOWTO document.. After login users cann not access their home directories though home directories owner and group is same as user login name respectively..i saw this error in the log file on

hi This is Tarun from Indusa Global , Jamaica pl. reply regards -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: tarun.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 180 bytes Desc: Card for tarun kumar Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/19990727/506b9d4c/tarun.vcf

Hi! I have to migrate a samba domain to an Active Directory and therefore I need as first step to have a NT4.0 BDC in my network. As I don't find an useful answer via google I want to ask you if a NT4 BDC will work in a Samba PDC enviroment? regards Martin

Hi. I downloaded the the "Remote Server Administration Tools" but whenever I want to add the group policy snap in I get the subject error message even though I am logged in as domain admin on the client work station. System(s): * CentOS 6.7 (all latest patches except samba due to one XP machine I have to keep due to legacy software, but not long!) * Clients are all Windows 7 bar 1

hi! we have completed testing samba pdc on a small network using fc3. we have been succesful so far. we now intend to totally replace our nt4 pdc with samba pdc. the following will be the main components of the network: 1. 300++ win98/2000/xx clients 2. win2003 db servers 3. terminal services with 100 clients before we shutdown the network and do the switch may i ask your inputs about the

Hi all, I'm trying to migrate NT PDC server to Samba PDC. and now i use samba 3.0.0beta2. I looks the migration steps from samba-howto-collection.pdf or in http://us2.samba.org/samba/ftp/cvs_current/docs/htmldocs/nt4migration.html, and it's not works well. The step is : ******** The approximate migration process is described below. " You will have an NT4 PDC that has the users,

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 14.48 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > > The cure is to STOP your windows clients trying to update their own > records. Yes, this is true, on windows I will stop this service. But my problem now is another The samba command samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately not work It's possible to resolve this

At my office there's talk of moving from a "WorkGroup" currently hosted through samba to a Domain, possibly hosted through samba. Anyone got a definitive "why we should or should not rip out the existing, working workgroup to put in a domain?" :wq! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert L. Harris | PGP Key

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 11.29 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > Try changing the 'options' of named.conf to this: Thanks Rowland Integrated your suggested changes and restart samba and named Now my named.conf is this[1], but none is change: [ root at server-addc ~]# samba_dnsupdate --all-names --fail-immediately update failed: REFUSED dic 04

On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:57:15 +0100 Dario Lesca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 16.00 +0100, Dario Lesca via samba ha > scritto: > > The samba command > > > > samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately > > > > not work > > > Following this howto, >

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 12.07 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > Is the DHCP server updating the records for you ? Yes, but for now the problem is not dhcp (see follow) > If so, you need to stop the windows clients trying to update their > own records, they don't own them. I have the problem when join to domani via samba on another server, or when I run

I have setup on Fedora 27 server a AD-DC samba server + bind + dhcp. All seem work fine: I can join to domain, add/remove dns records with samba-tools, access to shared folder, use MS Management Console on Win7, ecc But when I join a new machine Samba winbind Member server to domain [ root at server-dati ~]# net ads join DOGMA-TO -U administrator Using short domain name --

gcc thinks that interpreting a multiplication result as a bool is confusing: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c: In function 'read_pll': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:133:8: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] In this instance, I think using multiplication is more intuitive than

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote: > gcc thinks that interpreting a multiplication result as a bool > is confusing: > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c: In function 'read_pll': > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:133:8: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Karol Herbst <karolherbst at gmail.com> wrote: >>> In this instance, I think using multiplication is more intuitive >>> than '&&', so I'm adding a comparison to zero instead to shut up >>> the warning. To further improve

gcc thinks that interpreting a multiplication result as a bool is confusing: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c: In function 'read_pll': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:133:8: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] Adding a temporary variable to contain the divisor helps make it clear what is

gcc thinks that interpreting a multiplication result as a bool is confusing: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c: In function 'read_pll': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:133:8: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] Adding a temporary variable to contain the divisor helps make it clear what is