similar to: Samba performance problem due changing kernel (2.4.20 Linux kernel)

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 08:39 ------- what patches from patch-o-matic do you use? Do you know how to reproduce this behaviour? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Greetings, I have just tested Syslinux 1.75 and Syslinux 2.00 on a floppy disk that worked fine with Kernel 2.4.19 on a 1.44Mb floppy disk (the kernel about 1.1Mb in size). I decided to update the Kernel to the new 2.4.20 (as well as 2.4.21-pre2 and 2.4.20-ac2) which I tested to work fine when booting from the HDD using Lilo, but when I took my original disk that used 2.4.19 and replaced the

Hi everyone, I need a 2.4.20 kernel patch for ext3 file system. It's corrupting our data. I did some google, and all pages led to this page http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ Where all the link to the patches I need are broken. Anyone can help me get these patches? OR I'm running 2.4.20 kernel right now, if I just do the kernel upgrade, do I still need to patch for ext3?

Apologies for the newbie question: I have a (stock) 2.4.20 build (*not* -ac), and I'm trying to work with large ext3 directories. By large, I mean 160,000 files per directory. (Yes, I know it would be better in nested directories but such is life). I feel htree would benefit me. Having upgraded from an earlier version of 2.4, I don't see any change, and close reading of the 2.4 changelog

Apologies for the newbie question: I have a (stock) 2.4.20 build (*not* -ac), and I'm trying to work with large ext3 directories. By large, I mean 160,000 files per directory. (Yes, I know it would be better in nested directories but such is life). I feel htree would benefit me. Close reading of the 2.4 changelog suggests that htree isn't in there - only a patch to prevent non-htree

(It was suggested I send a copy of this to ext3-users, so here it is - note that I need this RAID going so I've rebuilt with reiser, but would still appreciate suggestions; the message was original sent to the lkml) Hi, I've just built an 800GB RAID5 array and built an ext3 file system on it; on trying to copy data off the 200GB RAID it is replacing I'm starting to see errors of the

There are three patches at http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.4/2.4.20/ sync_fs.patch: Fix the ext3 data=journal data-loss-on-unmount bug sync_fs-fix.patch: Fix sync_fs.patch to not deadlock the fs when running `mount -o remount' against a heavily loaded filesystem. ext3-use-after-free.patch Fix a use-after-free bug which can cause memory corruption if the filesystem runs

Hi, I am using linux 2.4.14 box for my bandwidth management.I patched the kernel for HTB support.I think HTB comes by default with 2.4.20.My doubt is "Is there any performance difference between patched kernel i.e. 2.4.14 and unpatched kernel 2.4.20 with respect to bandwidth management ?" Thanks in advance, Aravind. Yahoo! India Careers: Over 50,000 jobsonline.

I''m currently running kernel 2.4.20 + the MPPE patch (linux-2.4.16-openssl-0.9.6b-mppe.patch). [root@gateway root]# uname -a Linux gateway.shorewall.net 2.4.20 #2 Thu Dec 5 18:02:38 PST 2002 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root@gateway root]# Seems to be OK with Shorewall. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://shorewall.sf.net ICQ: #60745924 \

If you decide to run kernel 2.4.20 under RH8.0, you may want to apply the following patch in /etc/rc.d: --- rc.sysinit.orig 2002-08-22 14:10:52.000000000 -0700 +++ rc.sysinit 2002-12-05 19:46:31.000000000 -0800 @@ -178,8 +178,8 @@ if [ $usb = "1" ]; then needusbstorage=`grep -e "^I.*Cls=08" /proc/bus/usb/devices 2>/dev/null` action $"Initializing USB

Hi, does someone have setup IMQ succesfully on kernel 2.4.20? If so, how did you do that. I only see the diff for kernel 2.4.19. Can I use that? Thanks, Martijn _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83 Summary: Owner matching support broken in Kernel 2.4.20 Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.7a Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83 outsider@key2peace.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24 gandalf@wlug.westbo.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |outsider@key2peace.org ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@wlug.westbo.se 2003-04-23 15:57 ------- *** Bug 83

Hi, The first patch had the problem that it was twice as long as intended, due to a '>>' instead of '>' in my script. I'm sure many of you figured that one out :) You can find the new, again untested, patch here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ebtables/ cheers, Bart

On Sunday March 16, gilbertd@treblig.org wrote: > Hi, > I've just built an 800GB RAID5 array and built an ext3 file system > on it; on trying to copy data off the 200GB RAID it is replacing I'm > starting to see errors of the form: > > kernel: EXT3-fs error (device md(9,2)): ext3_new_block: Allocating block in > system zone - block = 140509185 > > and >

I have a NFS server with stock 2.4.20 patched with the 5 data=journal patches, plus the 2.4 LSM and NSA's selinux. The partition is mounted with the options: rw,noatime,nosuid,nodev,data=journal,errors=remount-ro The oops seems to happen when the fs is under load. I don't think I encountered this behavior with a non LSM/selinux kernel, so it may have something to do with those, but I

Hi, I got the OOPS below on my laptop running vanilla 2.4.20-ac2; I had to copy it byhand so it may not be 100% accurate. It hasn't happened again, and this is the first problem I've had with this kernel (or any other kernel, for that matter.) Anyway, I'm not sure, if a) this is actually an ext3 problem, b) OOPS reports of 2.4.20-ac2 are of any interest, so I won't bother with

Hello, I am currently struggling with the final step (so it seems) in using a RH9 box with standardized kernel build 2.4.20, with enabled acl, and Samba 3 built with ACL enabled as well. I am able to join the domian with net ADS join -U USERNAME, and use wbinfo and getent, showing the users and groups from the domain. However, I am incappable of setting the permissions so DOMAIN+USER can use the

Hi, for some days now I am/was fighting with an annoying problem. I have to support an environment where RhostRSAAuthecntication via /etc/ssh/sshd_known_hosts is used for password-less login. This works fine with RH7.3 (and RH8) and openssh versions openssh-3.1p1-3 (and openssh-3.4p1-2). Our customer has now requested an upgrade to RH9. That comes with openssh-3.5p-11 and the password-less