similar to: Samba 2.2x bits attributes mapped on Linux file permissions

Hi there. I'm running Samba 2.2.3a on RedHat 7.1 + kernel 2.4.17. My girlfriend's laptop is running Windows 2000 + service pack 2. She has about a thousand MP3s stored on a Samba share on my RedHat machine. We were finding that she couldn't rename any MP3s on the Samba share: she would always get a sharing violation. After a day of reading Samba logs at debug 10 (_such_ fun [ ;)

############################# In German : Hallo, gibt es da Jemanden der mir den folgenden Text vielleicht ein bischen besser erkl?ren kann? Habe dies aus dem Samba Developers Guide. Warum mach ich das nun? Ich habe ein Problem: Ich will das jedes mal wenn ein User versucht einen Ordner in der Freigabe zu verschieben oder umzubenenner, der nicht leer ist, eine Fehlermeldung auf dem Client

Hello! Jerry you are right about script and permissions! I'm looking again to usrmgr.exe and has corrected most of the problems of which I spoke earlier This patch is corrected most problems, but i can't fixed, current moment, problems where "not root" create "global group" ... sorry :( This patch not create security holes and another holes ... :) I'm testing

The new messages are written in ------------------> ------------------- caas it wrote: | I am using samba-3.0.7 on kernel version 2.6.5-3 | (client as well as server). | I traced the exact function calling sequence when a | "mkdir" command is given at the client side. | I got stuck at the server side, | | source/smbd/vfs.c - vfs_MkDir() - | SMB_VFS_MKDIR(conn,name,mode) (line no

I'm running samba 3.0.23c on aix 5.3 TL4. I'm using Tivoli HSM 5.3.4.0 on a JFS2 filesystem. Samba compiled fine, and I set "dmapi support = yes" in smb.conf, but samba wouldn't recognize offline files ("migrated files" in tsm terminology). After setting a higher log level I think I've tracked down the problem. The patch is at the bottom of this email.

Dear Samba gurus, I am still using Samba 2.2.8a; I have not seen an announcement that this issue would be fixed in 3.0.2; all that follows refers to 2.2.8a. Quoting from Samba-PDC-HOWTO.html (or Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html): Joining the Client to the Domain Windows 2000 ... Windows prompts for an account and password that is privileged to join the domain. A Samba administrative

Hi, We have a simple "Remote Procedure Call" mechanism that we are using to communicate between Windows computers and our Unix Samba server. The Windows application is proprietary software (Progress - not ours) and we have to work within the constraints of it. We have a Unix named pipe sitting in a Samba shared directory. We have a small C program that runs as a Unix daemon,

Dear Samba team. I have hybrid network with MSDOS / Win9x(ME) / Win2k/XP(NT) computers at home. I'm using Samba as PDC. W9x/me clients works fine as so as with roving profiles, but I'm experiencing problems with w2k, NT4/XP just not test because i'm testing on my box at home and when it'll work fine then I'll go to clients from which smaller part has XPs installed on PC.

I am using samba-3.0.7 on kernel version 2.6.5-3 (client as well as server). I traced the exact function calling sequence when a "mkdir" command is given at the client side. I got stuck at the server side, source/smbd/vfs.c - vfs_MkDir() - SMB_VFS_MKDIR(conn,name,mode) (line no 357) Could anyone please tell me exactly where is the vfs_ops struct initialised, and which function will

I believe it was expected that Samba would allow domain joins by people in the "admin group=" parameter -- I seem to remember reading that somewhere... I also seem to remember (and have discovered) that, no, it is in fact "root", or UID 0 only, who can accomplish this task. My question is, what are the ways around this? There are people in my organization who will be joining

Hi All, Could anyone please shed some light on the below too errors (and how to fix them). The first one seems the more serious Error 1 p 21 07:40:48 server smbd[8528]: [2004/09/21 07:40:48, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(412) Sep 21 07:40:48 server smbd[8528]: write_socket: Error writing 5 bytes to socket 16: ERRNO = Connection reset by peer Sep 21 07:40:48 server smbd[8528]: [2004/09/21

I am certainly not an expert on Samba, so I apologize in advance for this question if I should know the answer. A week ago our main file server crashed and had to be replaced. Our new server is running Fedora Core 8 and Samba 3.0.26a-6 but has been very unstable. We are running a small network of Windows XP Pro and Home clients accessing the server (10 clients). ERROR ONE: I am getting

Just a couple of quick fixes for trans2.c and README in samba-2.2.3a. --- source/smbd/trans2.c.old Tue Feb 5 14:37:55 2002 +++ source/smbd/trans2.c Wed Feb 20 10:26:16 2002 @@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ if(!S_ISLNK(sbuf.st_mode)) return(UNIXERROR(ERRSRV,ERRbadlink)); #else - return(UNIXERROR(ERRDOS,ErrNotALink)); +

Hello All. I am trying to set up a rails+mongrel+mod_proxy_balance application. Unfortunately the stock apache install on centos is the 2.0 series which does not support mod_proxy_balance. I could not find the 2.2X RPMs on dag or dries either. Is there a yummy way to upgrade to the 2.2 series of apache? I tried with the individual RMPS but no joy there due to comples web of dependencies.

Hello there, sorry - my first mail seems to be lost? Might be I am wrong, but it seems that the behavior of wide link option has been changed since 2.2.7. So we have some problems on our large side to upgrade to 2.2.8a. Here is what I found, but it may be not the intention of samba developer! There ist a new function called readlink_checkin smbd/vfs.c. In this function is a pattern compare

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Matt Giuca <mattgiuca at gmail.com> wrote: > It seems like your language is very high level indeed (it almost sounds > dynamic). If you can pass arbitrary messages without needing to statically > know the type of anything, and pass data transparently from one machine to > another. It is in no way dynamic, everything is compiled down. All Actors

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jonathan D. Turner <jonathan.d.turner at gmail.com> wrote: > I saw this was mentioned briefly last year, but there seemed to be > some confusion as to what coroutines entailed and the thread died out. >  This technique has an unfortunate number of names, but it does get a > lot of use, including popular languages like Ruby. > > I'm

Hello, I hope this is the correct place for this mail... I have found that samba-2.2.3a (--with-ldapsam) gives the correct logon home for win2k, but not for win98. Obviously the two systems request the information in a different way. For win98 machines, in lanman.c, the information is taken only from smb.conf, and not from ldap (or other backends). I have attached a small patch that yields

When trying to compile samab-2.2.0 on a Ultrix 4.5 box i get the following error: . . . . Compiling smbd/blocking.c Compiling smbd/sec_ctx.c smbd/sec_ctx.c: In function `initialise_groups': smbd/sec_ctx.c:227: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type smbd/sec_ctx.c:227: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type Compiling smbd/vfs.c

Hello! I have compiled samba v2.2.9 without ACL support and when I test skel vfs module I have encountered internal errors (SIGSEGV in child processes). Consider the file source/samba/vfs.c: struct vfs_ops default_vfs_ops = { ... /* POSIX ACL operations. */ #if defined(HAVE_NO_ACLS) NULL, NULL, #else vfswrap_chmod_acl, vfswrap_fchmod_acl, #endif ... }; As