similar to: Oplocks on Windows Clients and Winbind revisited

I've modified the contention limit in attempt to troubleshoot this, thinking that perhaps the client may be requesting multiple oplocks for whatever reason. The client is still not getting an oplock without specifying 'fake oplocks = yes'. I'm open to any ideas for troubleshooting. I've also checked to see if oplocks are explicitly disabled on the client, and they are not.

Hi folks I'm running two Samba servers. One is on Ubuntu 5.10 (samba-3.0.14a-6ubuntu1), the other is SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (samba-3.0.20b-3.4). The Ubuntu box is on my local network, and the SLES box is across a WAN with an intervening WAFS appliance with TCP acceleration. Neither set-up seems to grant an oplock to the client unless I turn on 'fake oplocks'. I've set

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:33:57AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>@Michael: move the kernel oplocks setting to the global section, then things may start to work as expected. > >With kernel oplocks = yes in [global] but without mentioning >smb2 leases, this thing behaves in a way similar to when setting >smb2 leases to no (also globally, as it is a global parameter), -- >I see

24.01.2023 20:09, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:38:29PM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> >> Here we've two files open, with kernel oplocks = yes (hence it is LEASE(), - >> before I enabled kernel oplocks, it was LEASE(RH) or LEASE(RWH)). > > Kernel oplocks do not support SMB2+ LEASES. So you're > just seeing old

Hi! I'm trying to understand how various ways to grant a file lease to (windows) clients works. Especially in context when files are being modified locally on the linux filesystem. For example, there's this wording in man smb.conf: kernel share modes ... Kernel share modes provide a minimal level of interoperability with local UNIX processes and NFS operations by

The kernel on my server appears to be refusing oplocks altogether. Setting 'kernel oplocks = no' resolved the issue. Is there any caveats I should be aware of? - Chris Wagner -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces+chriswagner=amyskitchen.net@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+chriswagner=amyskitchen.net@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Chris Wagner Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:29:17PM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >24.01.2023 20:22, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: >>What Samba version is this? This: >> >>>LEASE() >> >>... looks broken: the handle oplock/lease state claims to be a >>lease, which means the client didn't request an oplock but a lease >>which should not have happened in

In my smb.conf file, I've got the following section: [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S guest ok = no read only = No create mask = 0640 directory mask = 0750 browseable = No veto oplock files = /*.mdb/*.MDB/*.pst/*.PST/ And yet, in the syslog, I'm still getting these... Mar 10 10:22:34 riffraff

Greetings All, Does anyone know how to turn oplocks off? I have tried everything I can think of to disable this feature but each time the PC will cache the file. If anybody has turned this off please send me your configuration file. Here is the latest config file I have tried. Thanks for any help, David. [global] printing = sysv printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes keepalive

Hi Lan with S4 and built-in file server for Windows clients. nfs for Linux clients. We are using LibreOffice to share documents and file locking works fine. The first guy to open the doc gets the lock and a message is displayed on other clients (windows or Linux) that the file is open. Fine Some users must however use Word 2010 to edit documents. Then file locking doesn't work: anyone

I know in 2.0.5a, level2 oplocks were broken. Can I safely use them in 2.0.6? I recall getting a performance increase when using them. Bill -- /------------------------------------------------------\ | | | William E. Jojo, Jr. | | | | Senior

Hi, I wonder if anyone else has seen this problem with visual studio 5.0.sp3 We are running NT4.0 sp3 + some updates such as euro etc. The problem is a bit of a surprise as it makes vc++ unusable on a samba share with oplocks on. it is surprising because I have definitely used vc++ in this configuration in the past. It occurs with all versions of samba 1.9.18 from p3 which we use as standard

Hello! When I'm set oplocks to Yes I'm getting "Oplock break failed for file %s" and files (.doc .xls and .jpg|png etc) take forever to load When I set oplocks to No files opening o.k. but MS Word is saying that they are Read Only. Permissions are 100% fine. The client is Windows 7 Enterprise. Please help.... this is so important to me :( Was it resolved in SAMBA

Hi All, I am running Samba version 3.0.7-2.FC2. I've been noticing the following messages in /var/log/messages: Sep 22 09:35:47 www kernel: lease broken - owner pid = 6024 Sep 22 09:36:32 www kernel: lease broken - owner pid = 25134 I've been told that if I place "kernel oplocks = false" in my smb.conf file, I won't see this message any more. However, if I do this, does

I need to set oplocking in smb.conf.I had it running for a while but on some windows pc's when i deleted a file it stayed there when attemping to delete for second time it threw an error saying file did not exist etc. I suspect this is windows problem so when i enable oplocking do i need to do anything on the windows pc's. I noticed this in the samba docs and wanted to confirm its the

Hello I've just installed a samba server on a OS X server. I enable oplocks and it's good for rtf, odt or doc. But with iWork files it's very strange, iWork saves files in folder and oplocks didn't work. If someone has already do it or has an idea :)

G'day, Brief LAN Layout: We have 2 vlans, 1 has WinNT 4 sp6a running as the PDC, there are 2 Slackware 7.1, 2.2.19 kernel, boxes, running samba 2.2.0, which both are on the 2 vlans. One linux box is the PDC for it's vlan. Both linux boxes run 2 copies of samba together, though the problem of smbd dieing was there when only 1 samba copy was running on each box. Cients are Win9x, with a

Hello I have a problem that I don't know where it originates. The following situation : A samba server on a colocation with a public and a private ip-address. The smb service is accessible on the private ip-address. Clients connect to the samba server through a windows vpn (pptp) and get an address in the same private range as the samba server has. They know start an application that uses a

Hi, I googled around and the general wisdom seems to be that oplocks provide a performance gain if files are accessed by a single client at a time (that is, if the oplock does not break). What I can't figure out is what test can show this performance gain. I mean, theoretically, document-editing applications (Word,excel) save and load whole files and hence do not benefit from oplocks.

Greetings All, I am trying to turn off oplocks and can not seem to figure out which parameters to use. I have tried setting oplocks = False in both the global section and in my share section. I have also tried setting veto oplock files = /*.txt/ in my share section. Each time I try this and restart the smbd program I get the same behaviour on the PC side. The file is cached on the PC side (I