similar to: Outlook.pst corrupt

I have alredy changed oplocks values and I have upgraded last version of samba for HP-UX 11 :( ver. 2.2.5 ). My problem has not been solved yet. I have same old PC with WIN 95 and first version of WIN98 that casually when I open OUTLOOK stop with message :outlook.pst is corrupted. This PC open also EXCEL,WORD,ACCESS ecc. files that don't give some problems.Only outlook.pst !!!! I think that

My problem is not the the restore or re-creataion of outlook.pst but is to understand why outlook.pst is corrupted when I open OUTLOOK-2000 or 98 ecc. I have this problem only when I use samba (2.2.5) on HP-UX 11. In other company I have server linux (RH 7.3) with samba and 20 PC that have all your files and mail-files (outlook ecc.) saved in share-directory in linux-server but in this

I had to move my RedHat 5 box acting as a PDC to a new IP address. It is running samba 3.5.10. After the move, none of my windows or linux samba clients worked anymore. I tried rejoining some to the domain, but would get error Unable to find a suitable server Join to domain 'MRIRESEARCH' is not valid The old PDC IP address is 132.183.202.95 and nothing is at that IP anymore (for 4

I have a new Dell server running Red Hat 8.0 Linux. I just downloaded and installed Samba 2.2.7 from the Red Hat Web site. I am having trouble with Microsoft Access 2000 data base locking. The program runs in a runtime version (.mde)on each client. Only the database(.mdb), the permissions file(.mdw) and the lock file (.ldb) are resident on the server running Samba. Each computer can individually

I'm trying to use Access 2002 on a Samba server.....question, are there special Samba parameters that need to be set so that 3-5 users can enter data? All users have proper access (no pun intended) to the SAMBA server..... thanks jr

We are running samba on a number of HP systems running HP/UX 11.00. We moved from samba version 2.0.7. to samba version 2.2.3a. We have about 200-400 smbd's running on one host. Samba version 2.2.3a was running without any problems for about two weeks. But now on two different servers indepent of each other, the file table was full. We found out that ONE smbd used about 5000 !!

It's good choice if You first upload Your version of samba with new version http://www.hp.com/products1/unix/operating/hpuxcifs9000/ (Cifs is SAMBA for HP-UX). I use this samba configuration and I have no problem: I suggest You to change security option in security = USER this is better and more secure.Security=share is option for old samba ! You must create unix users , samba users and

Hello. after getting suse 9.0 loaded on a new machine here an configuring samba 2.28 that came on the cd's I'm having a locking problem with some access database files. I had this same problem when i first went to linux 2 years go an started storing some access database files on the server. It seems only one person (an sometimes 2 i'm told by the users) can have the file open at

This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content preview: Hi, I'm running samba as a file store in our windows 2000 domain and are having a few problems with MS Access, we have a couple of users accessing the same mdb file,

I would like to pose the following problem to this mailing list to see if any of you have any suggestions you may offer. I am running samba on a RedHat 7.2 Athalon box with software RAID 0 dual IDE disks on an ext3 filesystem. I have several users in a large community of users that are always hitting the samba server. The machine has been consistently reliable with one exception. There is

Hi, we still have some trouble running a MS Access-database on Samba. We now tried it with v.2.2.6 on RH 7.3 but still we either get no acces on the database simultanously or we run in problems with updating the database. The problem is that we make some changes on one of the clients but the changes are not visible to the other clients until they shut down the database and reopen it. We

There are one or two open bug reports in the Debian bug tracking system that boil down to being able to specify the order files are trasferred. One example where this is useful is to first transfer the packages, then the list of packages. That means that the available list of packages is always consistent, without any packages listed being temporarily unavailable. I'm sure Wayne knows this

-q seems to override -v completely, but when combined with --progress, a single newline is output when there are no updates transferred; but if a file *was* updated nothing at all is output. It seems that there might be some short-circuited code when nothing is trasferred, but that a check for quiet mode is skipped somehow. Paul

Thank you for your kind explanation. I did it as you mentioned. That is, I set '-march=x86 hello.bc' in the Command Arguments. (I also set my compiled LLC, i.e., LLVM_ROOT_DIR\win32\debug\llc.exe, in the property name Command.) But, when I made a breakpoint in main( ) of llc.cpp and then started to debug I found the 'InputFilename'(llc.cpp:176) is shown like {???}. Therefore it

On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 11:29 -0400, Jon wrote: > One piece of information that I forgot to > mention in my original post is that the second rsync takes about 3 > seconds. There are no files transferred on the second rsync yet the > 293 are being reported. > > If the files were actually being transferred again then I could agree, > but that's not the case, Rsync seems to be

Hello, I''m writing to inform you that projects.puppetlabs.com will be undergoing maintenance this evening from 7PM to 8PM PST. There will be a short period of downtime as the application is shut down and minor additional functionality is added. I will send out follow up communication when the maintenance has been completed. Thank you, Matt Kirby - kirby@puppetlabs.com -- You received

Webinar signup: Advances in Gradient Boosting: the Power of Post-Processing December 14, 10-11 a.m., PST Webinar Registration: http://2.salford-systems.com/gradientboosting-and-post-processing/ Course Outline: * Gradient Boosting and Post-Processing: o What is missing from Gradient Boosting? o Why post-processing techniques are used? * Applications Benefiting from

Webinar: Advances in Gradient Boosting: the Power of Post-Processing TOMORROW: December 14, 10-11 a.m., PST Webinar Registration: http://2.salford-systems.com/gradientboosting-and-post-processing/ Course Outline: I. Gradient Boosting and Post-Processing: o What is missing from Gradient Boosting? o Why post-processing techniques are used? II. Applications Benefiting from Post-Processing:

Hi, We need to upgrade our Jenkins instance on Green Dragon. We will do so this evening, Wednesday the 7th at 18:30 PST. Email and IRC notifications will be down for a bit after we bring the system back up to allow time for testing. We will notify the list once we are back in full operation. Thanks for your time. Respectfully, Mike Edwards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hello everyone, LLVM buildmaster will be unavailable for shot time after 5:30 pm PST today for updates and maintenance. Thanks Galina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180330/15b79d93/attachment.html>