similar to: [wietse@porcupine.org: Re: syncronous directory operation for linux (ext2)]

Hello and good evening. Sorry for responding so late, it is midsummer and i spend as much time as possible on the outside (bicycle, mostly). (Just one more day, then 10 degrees colder!!) I Cc: Wietse Venema, because i quote a message of him. (this is "set quote-add-cc" here.) Aki Tuomi wrote in <84881193.5398.1597934431687 at appsuite-dev-gw2.open-xchange.com>: The dovecot

Aki Tuomi wrote in <1907575568.4364.1597984769802 at appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>: |> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: ... |> Wietse Venema wrote in |> <4BXSTk189nzJrP3 at spike.porcupine.org>: |> ... |>|Steffen Nurpmeso: |> ... |>|> until SASL says it is done?!. How could EXTERNAL ever work

> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: > > > Hello and good evening. > > Sorry for responding so late, it is midsummer and i spend as much > time as possible on the outside (bicycle, mostly). (Just one more > day, then 10 degrees colder!!) > > I Cc: Wietse Venema, because i quote a message of him. > (this is "set

In response to my request for postfix to support dovecot auth arguments I got the forwarded reply. If someone gets around to this before me I won't be offended. ------------ Story is I deployed a webmail with certificate based authentication that substitutes a global master password (http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/MasterUsers) when the certificate matches. The webmail accesses

Hello. I am not subscribed and new here, so first of all i want to thank you for dovecot. I personally do not use it in "production" (yet), but it is my sole point of interaction for testing the little MUA i maintain for quite some years. I also have used its code for affirmation purposes. (Interesting that OAUTHBEARER treats hostname and port as optional. I currently do

postfix-users seems to be a subscription only list. I'd recommend incorporating TDMA <http://tdma.sf.net/> to allow for easy discussion by outsiders Andrew Morton (of ext3 fame) had sent this message to postfix-users list I am forwarding so that Wietse can hopefully provide the definitive answer to the question Andrew Morton/Stephen Tweedie seek ----- Forwarded message from Andrew

Hi Are there any known security holes or necessary precautions in using port forwarding with ipportfw? I'm planning on forwarding ports from an outer firewall/router (connected to the Internet) to a host in the DMZ, then on from the DMZ host to the inner firewall, and finally from the inner firewall to some host on the inside. Thanks, Jens jph@strengur.is From mail@mail.redhat.com Wed

This was just posted on the Postfix list. Centos 7 ships with: postfix-2.10.1-6.el7 Has this cert advisory been applied to the Centos build of Postfix? thank you -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Obsolete NSA exploit for Postfix 2.0 - 2.2 Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 16:18:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Wietse Venema <wietse at porcupine.org> To: Postfix users <postfix-users at

On Mon, December 8, 2014 20:01, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > rpm -q selinux-policy > > selinux-policy-3.7.19-260.el6 is the current policy in development. >> Thank you. >>>> #============= postfix_showq_t ============== >>>> allow postfix_showq_t tmp_t:dir read; >>> Any reason postfix would be listing the contents of /tmp or /var/tmp? >>>

Howyd all? Seems that I have been routed. Possibly by a physical B&E, but who knows? Probably some of you do.... anyways, some politically sensitive email was deleted from a user account and the line low -tr & inserted into my .xinitrc . Duncan (Dhu) Campbell

> On 21/08/2020 17:56 Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: > > > Aki Tuomi wrote in > <1907575568.4364.1597984769802 at appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>: > |> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: > ... > |> Wietse Venema wrote in > |> <4BXSTk189nzJrP3 at spike.porcupine.org>: >

A little over a week ago I posted asking about setting up a linux box between an existing router and a switch in order to provide firewall service to a subnet of machines. I was curious what experience others had with this type of setup in terms of machines, configurations, and the appropriateness of using linux in this manner. There were basically three issues discussed in replies: hardware

Dear Open SSH and TCP Wrappers Colleagues, We are trying to use open ssh 3.1p1 on SPARC platforms under Solaris 2.8 using gcc 2.95.2, in conjunction with tcp wrappers 7.6 (IPv6 version). The wrapping of open ssh is not too well documented but I think we have figured most of this out (hearty thanks to Wietse Venema, Jim Mintha & Niels Provos for their helpful email exchanges) -- but have one

Hello fellow CentOS users, I'm using: # cat /etc/*release CentOS release 6.3 (Final) # rpm -qa | grep post postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64 on 2 servers: preferans.de and (yes, funny name) static.103.78.9.176.clients.your-server.de I own several domains and would like all incoming mails addressing those domains to be forwarded to my Gmail address. So I have setup the MX-records for my

http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/ Valgrind is a GPL'd tool to help you find memory-management problems in your programs. When a program is run under Valgrind's supervision, all reads and writes of memory are checked, and calls to malloc/new/free/delete are intercepted. As a result, Valgrind can detect problems such as: * Use of uninitialised memory * Reading/writing memory after

I don't know if this is RedHat 5.1 specific, but be aware that the version of portmap distributed is the enhanced (Wietse Venema) version. That's great, except for two things. The first is documented, but easy to overlook: "In order to avoid deadlocks, the portmap program does not attempt to look up the remote host name or user name...The upshot of all this is that only network

Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> writes: > By the way, on the NUT CI farm the libwrap is present on some (though not > all) systems - covering linux, freebsd, openindiana... and neither > complained about `sockdebug` :\ > > What version do you have? Maybe it is some alternate implementation? Looks like 7.4, as amended in NetBSD over the years. Looks like the

On Fri, March 31, 2017 4:46 pm, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 03/31/2017 02:40 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: >> On 3/31/2017 2:15 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> Well, it sounds like you are one of the companies with whose effort I >>> have >>> to fight constantly in my own effort to protect our users from spam... >> >> What makes Postfix superior in fighting

Hi, well, swift response! Qualcomm has a patched qpopper (2.5) Greetings, Jan-Philip Velders <jpv@jvelders.tn.tudelft.nl> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 21:43:18 -0700 From: Praveen Yaramada <pyaramad@QUALCOMM.COM> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG Subject: Patched Qpopper2.5 release Notification. Hello Folks, As you are already aware that qpopper

Postfix <http://www.postfix.org> does a chattr +S on its spool directory when it is installed on Linux. This is what is written in the postfix startup script -- # # LINUX by default does not synchronously update directories - # that's dangerous for mail. # if [ -f /usr/bin/chattr ] then CHATTR="/usr/bin/chattr +S" else CHATTR=echo fi -- Is this still required on ext3 ?