similar to: LookupDomain request gets STATUS_NO_SUCH_DOMAIN

I had previously posted twice concerning problems I was having. I assume that because I didn't get any answers that perhaps no one knew what was the matter. Now that I figured it out maybe someone else has the same problem and I can help to fix it. After having already applied the proper registry hacks and policy edits required for Windows XP (This is one area of John Terpstra's PDF that

I am attempting to join a Domain named WORKGROUP on my Linux box running Samba 2.2.7 from my SP1 Windows XP machine. Every time I try to join it says that the Domain doesn't exist or could not be contacted. Many months ago I was able to join all of our Windows 2000 machines to the same domain, but it may have been an older version of Samba back then. Also, I haven't dared try un-joining a

it seemed like a simple configuration issue. i was hoping someone could point me in the right direction. seems i was wrong. i may as well unsubscribe this list as there is not much help here On 02/11/2016 18:29, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > is there something more i need to be doing my end? > > On 25/10/2016 09:11, Matthew Broadhead wrote: >> are there any instructions or tests

are there any instructions or tests i can make to check the sieve configuration? or does the magic all happen internally and there are no settings to change? On 21/10/2016 10:22, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > the server is using CentOS 7 and that is the package that comes > through yum. everything is up to date. i am hesitant to install a > new package manually as that could cause

Op 10/20/2016 om 7:38 PM schreef Matthew Broadhead: > do i need to provide more information? > It still doesn't make sense to me. I do notice that the version you're using is ancient (dated 26-09-2013), which may well the problem. Do have the ability to upgrade? Regards, Stephan. > On 19/10/2016 14:49, Matthew Broadhead wrote: >> /var/log/maillog showed this >>

/var/log/maillog showed this Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/smtpd[1298]: 7599A2C19C6: client=unknown[127.0.0.1] Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/cleanup[1085]: 7599A2C19C6: message-id=<edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk> Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/qmgr[1059]: 7599A2C19C6: from=<matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk>, size=3190, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1

is there something more i need to be doing my end? On 25/10/2016 09:11, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > are there any instructions or tests i can make to check the sieve > configuration? or does the magic all happen internally and there are > no settings to change? > > On 21/10/2016 10:22, Matthew Broadhead wrote: >> the server is using CentOS 7 and that is the package that

Hi Michael, Geronimo JavaMail hard defaults to / separator. If the separator is manually set to undefined it automatically calculates the separator correctly. However neither through JavaMail or by command line does LIST "." "*" or LIST . "*" produce any root listing of default folder on my Dovecot installation. Only LIST "" "*" produces a

do i need to provide more information? On 19/10/2016 14:49, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > /var/log/maillog showed this > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/smtpd[1298]: 7599A2C19C6: > client=unknown[127.0.0.1] > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/cleanup[1085]: 7599A2C19C6: > message-id=<edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk> > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/qmgr[1059]:

"A non-empty reference name argument is the name of a mailbox or a level of mailbox hierarchy, and indicates the context in which the mailbox name is interpreted." If Dovecot is using "." as the separator in the base level of hierarchy, then it correctly is returning nothing for 'LIST / "*"' - since no mailboxes in Dovecot live under that base level of

the server is using CentOS 7 and that is the package that comes through yum. everything is up to date. i am hesitant to install a new package manually as that could cause other compatibility issues? is there another way to test the configuration on the server? On 21/10/2016 01:07, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 10/20/2016 om 7:38 PM schreef Matthew Broadhead: >> do i need to provide

Thanks Michael. I have forwarded that link to the Geronimo JavaMail team in case they think of anything their end. But in the documentation you sent it seems that Dovecot should respond in the case of LIST / "*" if my understanding is correct Is there any way to adjust this behaviour in the settings? I am struggling to search for a solution to the problem given the limited

without comments [global]     workgroup = NBMDARTFORD     server string = Samba Server Version %v     netbios name = SCARECROW     log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m     max log size = 50     security = user     passdb backend = tdbsam     map to guest = Bad User     guest account = nobody     domain master = yes     domain logons = yes     logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U     logon

Also, please provide an example scenario; i.e., for one problematic delivery provide: - The values of the variables substituted in the dovecot-lda command line; i.e., provide that command line. - The incoming e-mail message. Regards, Stephan. Op 19-10-2016 om 12:43 schreef Matthew Broadhead: > dovecot is configured by sentora control panel to a certain extent. if > you want those

You probably want to read the description of "reference name argument" to understand what is happening here. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501#section-6.3.8 michael > On April 17, 2017 at 8:33 AM Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi, > > i am using dovecot-2.2.10-7.el7.x86_64 on > centos-release-7-3.1611.el7.centos.x86_64.

Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >> does anyone know of a linux module (maybe similar to fail2ban) that >> could be installed which would monitor email logs (sign ins) and alert >> the user to any suspicious activity on their account? I just monitor straight from the logs using homebrew utilties. @lbutlr" <kremels at kreme.com>

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:13:10 +0000 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: > does anyone know of a linux module (maybe similar to fail2ban) that > could be installed which would monitor email logs (sign ins) and > alert the user to any suspicious activity on their account? i > suspect it would need to log geo location, device type and ip address > to a

On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 11:41:04 +0100 Matthew Broadhead via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > just checked the logs and i get this > > [root at localhost ~]# tail /var/log/samba/log.rnp00267380a647 > [2018/12/05 11:27:36.333627,  0] > ../lib/param/loadparm.c:1844(lpcfg_do_service_parameter) >   Ignoring unknown parameter "profile acls" > [2018/12/05

Could you send your configuration (output from `dovecot -n`)? Also, please provide an example scenario; i.e., for one problematic delivery provide: - The values of the variables substituted below. - The incoming e-mail message. - The Sieve script (or at least that vacation command). Regards, Stephan. Op 19-10-2016 om 11:42 schreef Matthew Broadhead: > hi, does anyone have any ideas

Op 19-10-2016 om 13:47 schreef Matthew Broadhead: > i am not 100% sure how to give you the information you require. > > my current setup in /etc/postfix/master.cf is > flags=DRhu user=vmail:mail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d > ${recipient} > so recipient would presumably be user at domain.tld? or do you want the > real email address of one of our users? is there