similar to: cifs samba mailing list

hello, maybe this is the wrong place, but according to http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html linux kernel cifs should be able to handle M$ dfs shares. I looked at the installation and usage instructions but it doesn't work. On the mount.cifs manpage I found no hint about a special switch to activate dfs parsing. Can anybody put some light into this? TIA -- Peter # uname

Thanks Cristoph, I have that code in my backend, but unless I do the following, the registers are never considered 'live' into the call. / Handle a function call let isCall = 1, Defs = [ R0, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31, R32, R33, R34, R35, R36, R37, R38, R39, R40, R41,

Hi Micah, > In X86InstrInfo.td for Call Instructions, it mentions that Uses for > argument registers are added manually. Can someone point me to the > location where they are added as the comment doesn't reference a > where or how? the register uses are added by the function X86TargetLowering::LowerCall() during the DAG Lowering phase. This is the relevant code segment: // Add

I am seeing a problem that I am not sure how to fix and since I have never had to use samba for anything major like this I am not sure where to go. So, here is goes! I have a few Gentoo systems that currently have a bunch of data on them. I have been tasked with getting data from some Windows machines to the Gentoo systems so that we can dump the Windows machines. So, the windows machines are

A severe vulnerability was found in the random number generator (RNG) of the Debian OpenSSL package, starting with version 0.9.8c-1 (and similar packages in derived distributions such as Ubuntu). While this bug is not present in the OpenSSL packages provided by CentOS, it may still affect CentOS users. The bug barred the OpenSSL random number generator from gaining enough entropy required for

Hello, my company recently changed the stucture of some shares (Win2000). Since then, we are not able to access these shares from Linux/Solaris anymore. I tried smbmount and smbclient and can access the top-level directory of the share and see the directory structure, but I can't see any data inside these directories. A few days ago, someone told me that msdfs is used for the new structure

Is there a way for me to disable signing? I have looked around but couldn't find anything > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-bounces+ycayer=3webmedia.com@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-bounces+ycayer=3webmedia.com@lists.samba.org] > On Behalf Of Andrew Bartlett > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 20:01 > To: Yannick Cayer > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re:

Dear sirs! I kindly ask you to help me with the following problem. I need to mount MS DFS tree Linux filesystem. I have: Linux Slackware 9.0. Kernel 2.4.21 compiling with support SMB file system. Samba 2.2.8a compiling with --with-msdfs In order to mount I type: mount -t smbfs -o username=name,password=***,workgroup=work //server/DfsRoot/mnt/DfsTree after cd /mnt/DfsTree In the DfsTree directory

Hi! I've just searching the list archives but cannot solve my problem with mounting samba (v3.0) shares back on linux (RH 8.0 and 9). Mounting on Win clients works fine and any filenames (including long names with non-ascii chars and spaces) are perfictly supported and accessed. Mounting the share back on (even the same) linux box is a complex task. I use: mount -t smbfs -o guest

I have encountered this error: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 26595: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection failed when I am attempting to mount a windows xp machine from a linux machine: mount -t smbfs //machine/share /root/smb_mnt -o username=administrator,password=mypass I have looked through the archives and found the following information concerning this

I have a question I hope one of you can help me with. In what version did Samba begin to include support for SMB signing? It looks like 3.0 but I need to be sure. According to http://de.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.0rc4.html <http://de.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.0rc4.html> on line 14 is states: 14) Full support for client and server SMB signing to ensure compatibility

I'm trying to set up a "dropbox" application that will monitor a directory for newly created files and process them. The problem I am having is that my linux process is not recognizing that a file is still being written to by another server. Here's the configuration: Redhat Linux with 2.4.9-31smp kernel using SAMBA 2.0.10 client to mount a share that exists on a Windows 2000

On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:28:33PM +0100, Carsten.Loeffler@command.de wrote: > No, I'm not really "taring". Right now I'm using following command to mount > a share on the windows box: > > smbmount //ntsrvsr3/cmdhp5 /mnt/backupsmb -o username=kwhadm,dmask=777 > > I also tried "mount -f smbfs ...."; but this failed as well. > > Some more

Greetings, I am trying, FROM a Linux Red Hat 7.3, to mount a share sitting on a Windows 2003 Server and I am getting the following problems. I had done this with a NT4 server and it was working fine. I am trying to mount the following: mount.smbfs //NT2003SERVER/share /mnt -o username=user,password=pass At first, I was getting the following error: cli_negprot: SMB signing is

In a past thread I've notice that smbmount (and mount's suport for it) will be discontinued and smbclient should be used insted. Sorry if the question is too lame but I use it in some of my systems now and I think I'll have trouble porting then to smbclient. Is smbmount been removed because it relays on kernel smb support? Samba will not need smb support in kernel in the

Hello Everyone, I have been working with two samba servers and i am having problems with the copy speed that i am getting out of the boxes. This is my setup. Dell 450MHZ 128 Mem 2 qlogic fiber cards 1.6T software raid 5/LVM Netgear 10/100 @ 100FD RedHat 7.3 samba 3.0.2a another box is a Compaq 2500 200MHZ 32 Mem 12G software RAID 0 3 drives Intel Pro 100 @ 100FD Debian 3.0 Samba 2.2.8a-0.1 for

Hi, I have been playing with the latest alpha (samba-3.0alpha20) for a while now trying to get Kerberos and smbmount working together to access shares on a Windows 2000 Server SP3. As I understand it, without modifications to the code this should not work at all. I tried to make a few changes, namely setting c->use_kerberos=True and commenting out c->use_spnego=False. I also had to comment

Hello, Samba-users, please don?t beat me, but I have to ask this question here, as I haven?t found an answer I can rely on until now. I am working on a solution for a backup-problem and one possible solution could be the use of smbfs/smbmount. I am testing that now, mounting a WinXPHome(sorry, testing ...)-share which is 20GB of size (8GB used) to my linux-box. The linux-box is a bit more

Just wondering if someone could help me debug this: I was moving data from an ATARAID (via Promise FastTrack100 Controller) into the LVM device below: 58,1: # cat /proc/lvm/VGs/foo3/LVs/bar name: /dev/foo3/bar size: 476315648 access: 3 status: 1 number: 0 open: 1 allocation: 0 device: 58:01 # /sbin/pvscan pvscan -- reading all physical volumes

Hi, Excuse my poor english !! I have a problem samba between linux and windows. I explain my actual situation : - windows 2000 SP4 - share a directory my_windows : d:\jagodin\partage - linux Redhat ES 4 - kernel version 2.6.9-5 in /etc/fstab : //my_windows/partage /export/home/cerit/jagodin/partage smbfs