similar to: FROM WIN XP: can't copy "file": network name no longer available

Hi, When trying to copy 5000+ files from a client PC to a Samba server I have the following problem. Halfway during the operation it hangs on always the same file. Windows XP (SP1) gives: Unable to copy file [filename]. Specified network name is no longer available. (I had to translate this from Dutch, so it is not the exact message). When checking with smbstatus I get this:

Hi Experts, When copying a big file from Windows to a Samba share working with the normal TDB mode rather than CTDB mode, the Windows client disconnected from the network ungracefully such as cable unplugging or network disabling. Then, try to delete the partial transferred file from another client, we will be prompted that another program is using this file. The lock can be easily observed by

Hi, After trying too long I fixed the problem below by reverting to the old 3c905 NIC. Problem solved but not understood. I had a similar 3c2000 NIC in another Samba server and it also failed to copy a large amount (5000+) of files. So that's two completely servers (hardware and Samba / Slackware version) having the same problem with any number of different clients. I couldn't imagine

Hi there, Let me first tell you our setup.... I'm at a school (actually 2 but who is counting) with approx 1000 students in a NT domain. In the past we have had problems with students consuming more diskspace than was intended. First we tried to enforce a quota using kix, but the little 'rats' soon figured a way around that. To overcome that we started using an Linux setup with

We are having some problems in our company's test group that did not exist when our Clearcase 2003.06 server existed on a Solaris 8 machine. Now we are running on RHEL 5.2 with Clearcase 7.0.1.3 with Samba 3.0.28 (despite the fact that IBM has only blessed up to 3.0.24) and running into some file locking issues with some scripts our test group runs. I am hoping that someone might have some

Dear all, I would need some help if we?re running in issues ?cause a wrong configuration of our shares, or it?s a bug in samba 4.12 On samba 4.11 we have no issues with our network shares when Windows Clients connect them. After upgrade to 4.12 we run in to the issue that network shares which are mounted as drives per gpo not working well, We get on windows when we try to open the network drive

For example something like STARTUP ( http://wiki.osdev.org/Linker_Scripts#STARTUP) is not accepted by the LLVM LLD. :-/ On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Sky Flyer <skylake007 at gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah I found it, that's nice. Thanks a milion. > Could you please tell me how can I specify my bootstrap (startup code) in > the linking process? > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016

search for VAStart. Cheers, Rafael On 20 April 2016 at 14:18, Sky Flyer <skylake007 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Thanks a lot. > For example the start entry for me is 0x11000 by default which I don't know > where it come from! I thought there should be a default thing that sets this > entry address. > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Rafael Espíndola

There is no default linker script. Cheers, Rafael On 20 April 2016 at 11:23, Sky Flyer via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > for instance, where is the internal default linker script located? How can I > change the default values, for example the star address... > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Sky Flyer <skylake007 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>

Hi, That's what the DecoderMethod is for. Similarly ParserMatchClass for the asm parser and PrintMethod for the asm printer: def CondCodeOperand : AsmOperandClass { let Name = "CondCode"; } def pred : PredicateOperand<OtherVT, (ops i32imm, i32imm), (ops (i32 14), (i32 zero_reg))> { let PrintMethod = "printPredicateOperand";

I am running a Samba Box as a Domain Member in a Windows ADS Domain (Windows Server 2003). The Box has joined the ADS domain and the kerberos authentication works, I can see "smbd" processes running with AD user accounts. But I can not set ACLs on the directories or the files located on the share. If I change them using Windows Explorer, they either will be ignored by samba, or I get the

Hi All, I have recently successfully configured Samba 3.3.15 and OpenLDAP as my offices PDC. I would like to disable the roaming profiles capability but it appears that no matter what I said, it is being ignored by Samba. First is my relevant snippet for the Logon Path and Logon Home being empty as described in the documentation. Then, following that, is my entire smb.conf -- please let me

Hi all, I experienced some test failures under Linux, probably caused by r232936: In the test SanitizerCommon-Unit :: Sanitizer-i386-Test/MemoryMappingLayout.CodeRange the temporary test file was opened write-only, but was read from, what subsequently failed: Note: Google Test filter = MemoryMappingLayout.CodeRange [==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case. [----------] Global test

OK, have repeated the test: - samba logs: http://www.mediafire.com/file/jy4qcyvqg6z39zu/logs.tar.gz/file - tcpdump log: http://www.mediafire.com/file/qzex3kxf2vzd87n/tcpdump_all.tar.gz/file The tcpdump log covers the whole period of testing time, from starting to stopping smb and nmb services. Previous logs deleted from mediafire. Now waiting for any advice from you, or let's

We have an Apple OSX 10.3.4 Opendirectory (LDAP) Server with an SAMBA (3.0.2) PDC Server with roaming profiles for Windows XP (SP1 Prof) Clients on the Server. The Share for the PCs is only shared with SMB. When a PC log off, the profile will be copied to the server and brings the error message that the files prf*.tmp can?t be copied to the server. This error message occours not every time and

Hi all, I'm trying to run a program off a network drive, however it insists on locking the DLL files it loads, so that no other process can access them (even read-only.) This means that only one person can run the program at a time, as opposed to the entire office running it at the same time. It looks like the option "share modes = no" will solve this, but before enabling it for

Alex, On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:30:01PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: > I applied the patch to a new build of Sernet 4.4.6 SRPM. I could still > open the file from both hosts, and in fact this time I could actually > open it on the same host without any problems: I don't see where you're opening the file twice from one smbclient below. Am I missing something? And then there's no

I am running Samba version 2.0.6 on Solaris 2.6. When I run smbstatus, it coredumps. Here is some detailed information that may help in killing this bug. This is a run of smbstatus where it coredumps, and afterwards, a gdb session. root@grads:/depot/samba-2.0.6/bin 174# ./smbstatus Samba version 2.0.6 Service uid gid pid machine ----------------------------------------------

Hello! I sent this message to samba-technical yesterday but as I saw no response (not even a RTFM ;), I'm crossposting. I just need some help to track down this bug. I can write a patch if I can find the guilt... ----- Forwarded message from "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@conectiva.com.br> ----- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:34:41 -0200 From: "Luis Claudio R.

Dear everyone, Your code is slow and you are interested in performance optimization for scientific software? Figuring out where’s the bottlenecks guided by performance evaluation tools. If you are interested in porting your code to a HPC hardware platform and architecture, than OpenACC as a user-driven directive-based performance-portable parallel programming model might be a solution. What are