similar to: Samba and IBM directory server 5.1 attributes problems :: attribute pwdmustchange already in ietf draft

Hello All, How do I change the heroku database( already existed ) table id to start from say 1000? I tried with a fresh database on local & it works with this:- *execute "ALTER users orders AUTO_INCREMENT = 1000"* Thanks, Avinash -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from

Did anybody get to work password change enforcement with Samba PDC running LDAP ? It looks like it is "semi-working". I was able to enforce password change with USRMGR, but now it keeps asking me for the password change every time. I checked the pwdMustChange attribute and it is still set to 0 for some reason (hence checkbox for the password change enforcement in USRMGR is still checked

We want to copy files with the group in the admin list of the [homes] share. The problem is that the copied files then are owned by root. I know this is normal unix behavior. However we want the copied files to be owned by the user of the homeshare. I read the samba howto section "Users Cannot Write to a Public Share". Although I want to set the owner on the home shares and not on a

Hello All, I have a link. Which I want to open as a new window :- <%= link_to "Google", "https://www.google.com", :popup => [''new_window_name'',''toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes''] %> But it is opening in the same page.... Any suggestions how to do it ?? Even hover will be

Hello All, I want to schedule a mail every day. I used whenever gem. I added gem ''whenever'' in my gemfile. Then in the terminal I did - "whenever ." which created a schedule.rb. In schedule.rd I added this piece of code:- set :environment, "development" every 2.minutes do runner "UserMailer.some_method" end Does it get invoked

Hello All, How can I add a popup in link_to image_tag? I am trying as :- <%= link_to image_tag(@user.avatar.url(:small)), ''/users/edit'', :popup=>[''original_image'', ''height=700,width=900''] %> It goes to the edit page. But it doesn''t opens popup. Is this the correct way to call a popup? How can I achieve this? Thanks,

Try to use firebug to assist you finding these changes. I never used AT&T website, but you may need to login and find the download url using firebug as I did: http://zenmachine.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/scraping-with-firebug-and-wwwmechanize/ regards, gm On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:12 PM, <mechanize-users-request at rubyforge.org>wrote: > Send Mechanize-users mailing list submissions

Hello All, I am using JRuby in Linux Ubuntu 10.10. In Rubymine IDE, I am getting as "Install Missing Gems" link. After clicking on that link, I am getting this error :- Installing pg (0.14.1) with native extensions Gem::Installer::ExtensionBuildError: ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. checking for pg_config... yes Using config values from /usr/bin/pg_config

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> Also, we need to know why there is a "license" chapter (chapter 9) >> and we need to remove it because ietf don't like it... > > IIRC, the reason for the license is to make the document compatible with > the Debian licensing guidelines or something like that. > I would like to know if we should keep this additional license chapter

On 3/30/09, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > It seems to be related to debian, that doesn't like the fact that not > everyone is allowed to modify these documents. If it's that much > problem, I'd say just remove it. Guys, both the Vorbis RTP and the Ogg media types RFCs have this clause. It did not raise any problem. If there are problems

On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Hi Aymeric, > > Yes, I'm receiving the emails but haven't had enough time to look into > the details yet. I've seen you responded to many comments, so what are > the ones for which we still need to respond? Summary is there: https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ballot/2837/ As I understand: we need to change

Sorry for the delay. On 4/13/09, Alfred E. Heggestad <aeh at db.org> wrote: > Ivo, could you also review the updated memo-status/copyright notice, > located on page 1-2 ? Is this a new standard for writing Internet drafts? I've never seen it in other documents. Specifically, this part: "This document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may not be created,

Hi Jean-Marc, Alfred and Greg, Are you receiving the mails from IETF about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex The mails are not coming from AVT mailing list, but I think we are all 3 part of a minimal list (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex at tools.ietf.org) dedicated to latest discussion about the draft. I have answered some questions, but there are small changes and adaptation still required to the ietf

[I had a look through the mail archives before sending this, but I didn't find anyone else having this issue.] Has anyone seen this before? I'm almost 100% certain I tested this nut correctly detected OB LB in the past, but when I happened to look at it today, I see it refusing to work -- apparently because the NUT client knows how to ask for RFC1628 OIDs, but not what to do with the

Hi everyone, Just to let you know that CELT 0.8.1 is out. It's mostly a bugfix release. The bit-stream is compatible with 0.8.0 with the only exception that CELT no longer supports weird frame sizes that have prime factors above 5. This shouldn't really affect anyone. For those of you unaware of the current effort to standardize an audio codec at the IETF, we have recently created a

Hi everyone, I'm pleased to announce that the IETF has just approved for Opus to become a standard. I'll still take a few more weeks of editing before it's published as an RFC, at which point we'll release version 1.0. From now on, we'll be replacing the use of the CELT name with Opus and I'd like to encourage everyone to switch to Opus in their applications. Note that

Today at 17:40-19:40 Eastern Standard Time (22:40-00:40 UTC) the IETF will be holding a Birds of a Feather session to discuss creating a working group for developing a next generation video codec for Internet use. Remote participation is open to everyone. This would be an effort somewhat similar to what we used to create the Opus audio codec. The IETF provides an open standardization process and

Today at 17:40-19:40 Eastern Standard Time (22:40-00:40 UTC) the IETF will be holding a Birds of a Feather session to discuss creating a working group for developing a next generation video codec for Internet use. Remote participation is open to everyone. This would be an effort somewhat similar to what we used to create the Opus audio codec. The IETF provides an open standardization process and

-------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: [87all] IETF 87 Technical Plenary Experiment Datum: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:15:23 -0700 Von: IAB Chair <mailto:iab-chair at ietf.org> <iab-chair at ietf.org> Antwort an: ietf at ietf.org An: 87all at ietf.org The OPUS codec, defined in RFC 6716, can scale from low bit-rate narrowband speech to very high quality stereo

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-secsh-newmodes-05.txt So what do people think of this?