similar to: RIDs in LDAP

When I set up my initial users for the Samba domain i did not realize that RIDs were supposed to be dynamic. I was creating the user as a posixAccount in LDAP, and then adding the Samba elements via a script that I wrote. Their RIDs are the same as their UID. For instance if I have a user with uidNumber 1036, her SID would be <domain-SID>-1036. This is fine except for idmapping for

I have a bunch of Windows users using a Win2k server as a PDC. I want to move all the server functions to a Samba server without disturbing the users in any way. The client machines are all Win2k, using local profiles. Samba insists on algorithmicly generating the RID from the UID, so the Windows user, after migration, gets a new SID and loses contact with their local profile. In fact, they

I'm trying to grasp pg. 154 of the "Official SAMBA-3" book by Terpstra and Vernooij and I'm just missing a critical networking concept. I understand that SIDs are the numerical identification of a user for the Windows world. I understand that UIDs are the equivalent for the *nix world. But what the @$@! is a Relative IDentifier (RID)?!? On page 153 the command to map a

I found that after moving my samba server to different hardware (and diferent Linux installation), domain logons cannot find their Windows profiles and created new ones. This is caused by the different RID of the users. It seems these are calculated as 2*UID + 1000. And my UID's on new server do not match those on the old one. How to force SAMBA to provide different RIDs for the users? I do

Hey everyone, I'm preparing for a transition in which I'll be moving everything (PDC, WINS server, big file shares) off an old Linux server running Samba 2.2.7 onto a much newer Linux system running Samba 3.0.22. In the process, I'll be switching from smbpasswd (only thing supported under Samba 2.x, if I understand correctly) to ldapsam on Samba 3.x. I want to keep the same domain

Hey all, I'm looking to merge multiple NT4 domains into a single infrastructure based on Samba3 and OpenLDAP on Linux of the Debian Sarge flavour (and, Bob willing, Samba4 before long). In order to allow some resources to be shared from a single Linux instance, I'm rather hoping that I can put every domain's information into a single LDAP DIT. The Samba PDCs will use only portions of

Hello list, I have a few questions to ask... I am about to migrate from Samba 2 to 3 (3.5.9). I am going to use LDAP as backend in the future and came across something I don't understand. As far as I know the 'old' way to generate RIDs for users is to take their uidnumber, multiply it by two and add 1000. For computer accounts it would be 1001 instead of 1000. I am now trying to

Is there any SIMPLE way to maintain consistent mappings between windows RIDs and UNIX/LINUX UIDs/GIDs among multiple samba servers servers running winbindd? Will that problem be addressed in future samba releases? I've read about the "idmap backend" possible solution but is that the only current one? Help!!!

Hi all, With the newest patches to LLVM, there should be no reason for having "#include <iostream>" in any library source code file, except for lib/ Support/Streams.cpp. Please use the following instead: OLD NEW --- --- std::ostream llvm::OStream std::istream llvm::IStream std::cerr llvm::cerr std::cerr llvm::cout

When I try to print out a instruction by the following way, I am getting the error message below. Anyone knows what's the problem? Instruction* inst; ... inst-print(cerr); testbuild.cpp:178: error: no matching function for call to 'llvm::Instruction::print(llvm::OStream&)' /x/pchsu/llvm/llvm-2.4/include/llvm/Value.h:83: note: candidates are: void

In a context where exceptions are caught, I ran the fragment: cerr << "allocating" << endl; char* arr[100]; for (int jj = 0; jj < 10; ++jj) { cerr << "jj = " << jj << endl; arr[jj] = new char[2000000000]; sleep (30); } sleep (10); for (int jj = 0; jj < 10; ++jj) delete[] arr[jj]; cerr

Hi, I noticed this code in lib/Transforms/Scalar/InstructionCombining.cpp: cerr << "WARNING: While resolving call to function '" << Callee->getName() << "' arguments were dropped!\n"; If you're using LLVM as a static compiler, this warning is a bit incongruous, because it's not formatted in the same way as warnings from

Hi, I am trying to reduce what I believe to be a miscompilation bug. Running lli on my bitcode file causes a segmentation fault. However, running bugpoint as bugpoint file.bc gives me the following errors, /tmp/ccAdmNqH.o: In function `_ZL17bus_error_handleriP7siginfoPv': bugpoint-test-program.bc-Vega5s.cbe.c:(.text+0x1b4e1): undefined reference to `std::cerr' /tmp/ccAdmNqH.o: In

Test Cases: (attached) Iteration code: (...) typedef TarjanSCC_iterator<CallGraph*> MyTarjan; CallGraph& callGraph = getAnalysis<CallGraph>(); MyTarjan iter = tarj_begin(&callGraph); MyTarjan end = tarj_end(&callGraph); while(iter!=end) iter++; (...) if you take the time to print out the function each non-looping node iter traverses, it never reaches main...

Hello everyone, I have a function here that I wrote but doesn't seem to work quite right. Attached is the code. In the calib funcion under the for loop Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i+1] returns NA's for everything after years 1983 and 1984. However the code works when it reads Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i]. I don't quite understand why since it should be

On my CentOS 5 box, in a C++ program that does much arithmetic, including numerous matrix multiplications, I have a situation in in which the result depends on the nature of nearby I/O. Thus, with all arithmetic done with type double, and where values are mostly in the range [-1.0e0,+1.0e0] or nearby, I do: cerr << "some stuff" << endl; mat3 = matmult(mat1,mat2); I

On Wed, 31 May 2006, Silken Tiger wrote: >> that requires a BasicBlockPass, it will fail the same was as when a >> ModulePass requires a FunctionPass. > void MParSchedule::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { > AU.setPreservesAll(); > } > > MParSchedule requires nothing and changes nothing. So hopefully the above code > represents this fact? Right

Hi, I am trying to compile the Hello World pass (described at http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html#basiccode) in an LLVM Project and I get an error, 'no match for ‘operator<<’ at line llvm::cerr << "*Hello: *" << F.getName() << "\n"; But when I looked up in the LLVM API Documentation, I think "<<" operator is not overloaded

Hi, I'm experimenting with using LLVM to generate dynamic FFI bridges in VisualWorks Smalltalk. LLVM is an amazing thing! I'm going from dynamically generated assembler source to machine code, and I have that all working, copied from the llc tool and the JIT example. I have two questions: 1. What optimization passes, if any, should I run on the module before I pass it to the

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Kasra wrote: > > Hi, > > for some reason I could not get the machine code generator for x86 > working. The interpreter is the only thing that works, is there > anything that I am missing here? > > This recently changed.  In your main program, please