Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "another quota related ext3fs crash..."
2001 Oct 14
1
possible ext3 bug?
hiya!
i'm currently running 2.4.12-ac1 w/o any further ext3 patches.
i've got a dir with some fairly big files (like 15mb/file) in it and while
sfv-checking these i got the following errors:
Oct 14 21:47:59 srck@trottelkunde attempt to access beyond end of device
Oct 14 21:47:59 srck@trottelkunde 16:42: rw=0, want=600889688, limit=12289725
Oct 14 21:47:59 srck@trottelkunde attempt to
2001 Dec 11
1
ext3 crash
Hi!
I experienced an ext3 crash a few days ago, the corresponding part of my
kernel log is attached (there were no IDE-errors, just the ext3 stuff).
The /home partition (/dev/hdd2) got remounted ro, so the box was still
usable somehow (was able to log in, kill stuff and reboot it).
I rebooted it, it came back up again w/o any problems, remounted /home ro
and did a e2fsck on it, which reported
2003 Jan 21
1
ext3 is still locking up
A brand new system setup with RH 7.3 is still Oopsing after every X hours.
The problem started after about 1 week without errors.
Sometimes everything is locked, sometimes still messages are written to /var/log/messages.
Sometimes other processes keep running (can still ping the machine)
I upgraded the kernel to 2.4.18-19.7.x, changed the memory, but still got problems.
When I read all sort of
2001 Nov 13
1
Oops in 2.2.20 with ext3-0.0.7a
One of our servers (false) just oopsed. In the middle of lunch. Any
advise?
On console:
false kernel: Assertion failure in journal_start() at transaction.c line
245: "handle->h_transaction->t_journal == journal"
In kernel log (ran it through ksymoops):
Nov 13 12:35:37 false kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
Nov 13 12:35:37
2002 Mar 27
1
assertion in journal_start
Hi,
I have a server configured as follows:
a standard 2.4.18 kernel, IDE discs, 1Gb RAM (not all used), load avg around 1-2.
a large partition, formatted reiserfs
within large partition are 80 300Mb loopback file systems, formatted ext3.
I got the following assertion yesterday which forced a lot of processes
into D state. I'm not sure how easy it is to reproduce this problem.
2002 Jan 16
1
crashing with ext3
hello!
i'm using redhat 7.2 with ext3 as my primary fs on kernel 2.4.17 +
grsecurity + acl
after 2-3 days of uptime i'm expiriencing problems... i attached below
excert from my system logs.
machine stops responing for a few seconds and after then it looks, like it's
in normal operation again. the only problem is load, which is incrementing
constantly, but cpu is 99% idle...
after
2002 Jan 16
0
problems with rh 7.2
hello!
i'm using redhat 7.2 with ext3 as my primary fs on kernel 2.4.17 +
grsecurity + acl
after 2-3 days of uptime i'm expiriencing problems... i attached below
excert from my system logs.
machine stops responing for a few seconds and after then it looks, like it's
in normal operation again. the only problem is load, which is incrementing
constantly, but cpu is 99% idle...
2017 Aug 27
1
[PATCH] ext4: Fix 64bit feature
As per ext4 specification:
> In ext2, ext3, and ext4 (when the 64bit feature is not enabled), the
> block group descriptor was only 32 bytes long and therefore ends at
> bg_checksum. On an ext4 filesystem with the 64bit feature enabled, the
> block group descriptor expands to at least the 64 bytes described below;
> the size is stored in the superblock.
Since block group
2002 Jun 22
1
Can't seem to recover errors
Hi,
When trying to run a particular program, I reproducibly get a few
dozen kernel messages of the form:
attempt to access beyond end of device
03:06: rw=0, want=536995844, limit=11680168
attempt to access beyond end of device
03:06: rw=0, want=1342296068, limit=11680168
2003 Jan 14
2
2.4.21-pre3 - problems with ext3
Hello
Since 2.4.20, we have problems with ext3. Machine is 2xPentium III (1GHz),
2GB RAM, 1GB swap. RH 8.0 (glibc-2.3.1-21), gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020903
We have a lot of users:
oceanic:~# wc -l /etc/passwd
6694 /etc/passwd
connected via SAMBA (2.2.7) from 200-300 Windows-XX workstations
Partition with ext3 looks like this:
oceanic:~# mount |grep ext3
/dev/sdb5 on /home1 type ext3
2009 Mar 20
1
[PATCH 2/4] Btrfs: clean up find_free_extent
The whole loop=0,1,2 thing was kind of odd and not very self explanatory. I''ve
replaced it with a list_for_each_entry on space_info->block_groups. If we have
a hint we just jump into the loop with the block group and start looking for
space. If we don''t find anything we start at the beginning and start looking.
We never come out of the loop with a ref on the block_group
2008 Oct 10
1
[PATCH] fix enospc when there is plenty of space
Hello,
So there is an odd case where we can possibly return -ENOSPC when there is in
fact space to be had. I think I finally have a hold on what the problem is, it
only happens with Metadata writes, and happens _very_ infrequently. What has to
happen is we have to allocate have allocated out of the first logical byte on
the disk, which would set last_alloc to first_logical_byte(root, 0), so
2009 Jul 31
1
[PATCH] Btrfs: make sure we find a bitmap entry
Yan Zheng hit a problem where we tried to remove some free space but failed
because we couldn''t find the free space entry. This is because the free space
was held within a bitmap that had a starting offset well before the actual
offset of the free space, and there were free space extents that were in the
same range as that offset, so tree_search_offset returned with NULL because we
2011 May 25
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: cache bitmaps when searching for a cluster
If we are looking for a cluster in a particularly sparse or fragmented block
group, we will do a lot of looping through the free space tree looking for
various things, and if we need to look at bitmaps we will endup doing the whole
dance twice. So instead add the bitmap entries to a temporary list so if we
have to do the bitmap search we can just look through the list of entries we''ve
2010 May 11
0
[PATCH 4/5] btrfs: don't cache empty block groups during mount
the tree log recover code expects no free space cached before it executes.
Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com>
---
diff -urp 4/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c 8/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
--- 4/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c 2010-05-11 14:15:29.174108554 +0800
+++ 8/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c 2010-05-11 13:26:38.036107000 +0800
@@ -316,11 +329,6 @@ static int caching_kthread(void *data)
if (!path)
2011 Mar 31
4
[PATCH] Btrfs: fix free space cache when there are pinned extents and clusters
I noticed a huge problem with the free space cache that was presenting as an
early ENOSPC. Turns out when writing the free space cache out I forgot to take
into account pinned extents and more importantly clusters. This would result in
us leaking free space everytime we unmounted the filesystem and remounted it. I
fix this by making sure to check and see if the current block group has a
cluster
2011 Jul 26
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: use bytes_may_use for all ENOSPC reservations
We have been using bytes_reserved for metadata reservations, which is wrong
since we use that to keep track of outstanding reservations from the allocator.
This resulted in us doing a lot of silly things to make sure we don''t allocate a
bunch of metadata chunks since we never had a real view of how much space was
actually in use by metadata.
There are a lot of fixes in here to make this
2011 Jul 27
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: use bytes_may_use for all ENOSPC reservations V2
We have been using bytes_reserved for metadata reservations, which is wrong
since we use that to keep track of outstanding reservations from the allocator.
This resulted in us doing a lot of silly things to make sure we don''t allocate a
bunch of metadata chunks since we never had a real view of how much space was
actually in use by metadata.
There are a lot of fixes in here to make this
2008 Sep 30
0
[PATCH] fix seekiness due to finding the wrong block group
Hello,
This patch fixes a problem where we end up seeking too much when *last_ptr is
valid. This happens because btrfs_lookup_first_block_group only returns a block
group that starts on or after the given search start, so if the search_start is
in the middle of a block group it will return the block group after the given
search_start, which is suboptimal. This patch fixes that by doing a
2010 Apr 19
0
Memory barrier not required in cached_block_group
Hi all,
It seems like memory barrier is not required in cached_block_group.I
am looking at kernel 2.6.34-rc2.
cache_block_group(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache)
{
smp_mb();
if (cache->cached != BTRFS_CACHE_NO)
return 0;
....
}
This function is called from btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent and
find_free_extent.
In btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent the code snippet is as follows