similar to: Missing components on configure

I am running redhat 7.3 with Samba 2.2.4. I was wondering if there was a way to use Samba to resolve my IPs instead of having to add all the entries to my /etc/hosts file? For instance, I would like to be able to do `ping acormany` instead of `ping <IP Address>`. We are currently using WINS on a Windows box to resolve the IPs. As of right now, I can `ping acormany` on a Windows system, but

I'm currently running redhat 7.3. Something happened where I can't configure samba in order to compile. I know some older kernels were removed from the system, so I'm not sure if that's the cause of it all or not. When I try to configure samba now, I get a lot of checks not found. For example: checking for strerror... no checking for chown... no checking for fchown... no checking

http://dovecot.org/tools/nfstest.c I wrote a test utility that tests different ways to flush NFS attribute cache and data cache. Please test in your NFS setup and show me the results, so I can make Dovecot v1.1 works well with NFS. Run the test several times (3 should be enough) to make sure the output stays the same, because the attribute cache flushes might incorrectly say "OK". And

I've been searching all over online, including man pages and anything else I could get a hold of. I am trying to tune my Samba to perform better. Here's the story: I have tested some software, running the server on Windows 2000 server and my PC as the client(Windows 2000). The results is Windows+Windows ran around 3 seconds. Then on the 'exact' same box I loaded Redhat 7.3 and

mainly question for the intel folks, any chance to rerun the ltp testsuites to see how we are doing these days with all the changes ? thanks :) Wim

Hai Stefan, Yes, its always better to ask the list, that way everybody can learn from it. ;-) > Do you think I will have to rejoin it to the domain? No i dont think so. Please note, o dont know anything about gentoo except that they have a good wiki/info pages. If this was debian, then in this case, what i would extra do here, run : samba -b and backup all folders of samba and any thing

here it is ---- [global] workgroup = all server string = Samba Server load printers = no security = user max log size = 200 time server = yes local master = no os level = 10 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%I printcap name = /dev/null netbios name = new07server-fst # log level = 2 acls:10

Am 07.09.18 um 20:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 19:09:37 +0200 > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> But >> >> # net rpc rights grant "Domänen-Admins" SeDiskOperatorPrivilege -U >> "mydomain\administrator" >> >> fails >> >> also for

On Wed, 30 May 2018 16:03:30 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > We see that it is old ("SWAT", date) and ugly ... > > > # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from UNKNOWN (192.168.100.66) > # Date: 2012/07/23 14:38:02 It isn't that old;-) You wont be using swat again, it

Hello, I have some trouble with the current setup (it's a testing environment): 2 server with Dovecot 1.1.4 from source (OS Debian testing 2.6.26) (name: "exim" and "exim2") 1 NFS server (OS Debian testing 2.6.26) I use NFS v.4, indexes shared over NFS. The relavant part of Dovecot configuration: dotlock_use_excl = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_nfs_index = yes

On Wed, 30 May 2018 15:26:37 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 2018-05-30 um 15:01 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > There are three main winbind backends, but only two are really used > > on Unix domain members, the 'ad' and the 'rid' backends. Which you > > use is really down to a simple

IRIX 6.5 has the basename() function in libgen. SYNOPSIS cc [flag ...] file ... -lgen [library ...] #include <libgen.h> char *basename (char *path); -- ayamura

Am 03.01.19 um 15:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:08:46 +0100 > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> We are in the process of switching over shares from the old way of >> doing this to Windows ACLs: >> >> disable "valid users" "write list" etc >>

Sorry if I'm duplicating an existing patch, but... On systems with no seteuid() that have setreuid() there is an emulation, but if both are lacking (but we do have setresuid()), nothing is done. The following seems to be right, but I've only got one machine (running an ancient version of HP-UX) which needs this so it may not be general: --cut-here-- --- config.h.in.orig Thu Jun 7

Hi, in configure.in the patch for `setvbuf' is missing while in sftp-int.c the HAVE_SETVBUF define is used: Index: configure.in =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/openssh_cvs/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.286 diff -u -p -r1.286 configure.in --- configure.in 2001/05/17 03:32:51 1.286 +++ configure.in 2001/05/22 11:59:54 @@ -460,7 +460,7

It looks like something got broken in openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c ... gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Dftruncate=chsize -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/ssl/includ e -I. -I.. -I../src/openbsd-compat -I../src/openbsd-compat/.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c ../src/openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c In file included from ../src/openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c:72:

Hi Jones, many thanks again four your help and your time. Thanks for the patch too - I'll check it up. On my Ubuntu, there is a Samba 4.1.6. I'll install the samba source package, and will try to apply the patch, then - I hope - the package will be compiled as well. I'll notify to you about the result. (First, I need to upgrade that server.) Thanks again, Ervin On Thu, Apr

configure.in patches for 2.9.9p2: 1. Allow --with-pcre to take a path specifying the root of the PCRE install (ROOT/include, ROOT/lib) 2. Ditto for --with-zlib 3. $no_libnsl and $no_libsocket can be determined programmatically 4. Check for innetgr, getspnam, and util in the default $LIBS before checking in -lrpc, -lgen, and -lutil, respectively 5. dirname() is in -lgen on some

Hi all, I get troubles with samba3x server: samba3x-winbind-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 samba3x-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 samba3x-common-3.3.8-0.52.el5_5.2 Some times, users call and ask of any folder in any share sleep. Locked not _all_ share, only one of it's folder. In logs i don't see any errors(for time of user call, may be errors in log was some times before). I use

Rsync people, Tell me if I'm wrong, but rsync seems to have a very serious race condition that would make it risky to transfer files into a directory writable by someone you don't trust if permissions are going to be granted to other people on those files. The rsync receiver creates a half-transferred file with 600 or 700 permissions; then the receiver writes the data and finalizes the