similar to: 2.2.1a / 2.2.2 bug is back in 2.2.8

Hi, I'm hunting a bug in 3.0.x (tested on 3.0.10 and 3.0.20). Users can create and modfy files, but cannot delete them. The logs show [2005/09/21 20:48:14, 0, pid=18388, effective(4019, 412), real(4019, 0)] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767) tdb(/srv/physik.fu-berlin.de/data/.samba/cluster1-test/cache/locking.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) [2005/09/21 20:48:15, 0,

We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote the attached patch. > > We got the logs by forcing smbd to run with -d10 by patching > file_server/fileserver.c. The issue appears to be in this call: 3638 /* Ensure there was no race condition. */ 3639 if (!check_same_stat(&smb_dname->st, &fsp->fsp_name->st)) { 3640

Whenever I try to read or modify ACLs from my Windows 2000 PDC, my Samba Domain Member Server (Security = ADS) does not allow setting ACLs, nor does it display the existing ACLs. - I have setup ACLs in my Kernel - I have translated and installed libacl and libattr - I can see and modify ACLs with getfacl and setfacl. - I have translated Samba 3.0.23d with --with-acl-support=yes - I have enabled

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:14:00PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:06:42PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, as much as I'd like to avoid adding a new option, I guess we > > > have to do something about it, my latest take on this is >

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:03:49PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:46:19PM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > > > > > Cheerio! > > > -slow > > > > Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: > > > > When adding the

T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk wrote: > > > But we'd like to go one step further and have the return code from preexec > be used to continue or abort the connection being established. The script > above would be modified to generate this return code. > > Looking through the source code (smbd/service.c), it doesn't seem to check > the return code (calling smbrun to do the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, I am encountering a problem with Samba and setting acl's for files/directories from the security dialog on my Windows clients. I can easily toggle the file permissions. However, it am not able to add/remove user/groups from the GUI interface on my windows clients. I have also noticed when I add access with setfacl it doesn't not

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.16 release series. Changes since 4.16.2 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15099: Using vfs_streams_xattr and deleting a file causes a panic. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 14986: Add support for bind 9.18. ?? * BUG

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.16 release series. Changes since 4.16.2 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15099: Using vfs_streams_xattr and deleting a file causes a panic. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 14986: Add support for bind 9.18. ?? * BUG

Hi, Jeremy: > That isn't any use. We don't need to know what is going on at the client, we need to know what is going on at the server. I pasted the samba log here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaoShuFeng/paste/master/samba_log The file I fsync()ing is called `aaa`. I can see some log about this file. Thanks Cao 在 2018年02月02日 21:07, Jeremy Allison 写道: > On Fri, Feb 02,

Hi, I have started using symbolic links on an SMB share and find that symbolic links whose target no longer exists cannot be removed on the client side. Example, on the SMB client side in an SMB-mounted directory: 1. Create a file and a relative symlink to it: $ touch a $ ln -s a b $ ls -l total 0 -rw-rw-r--. 1 andi andi 0 Jan 6 14:42 a lrwxrwxrwx. 1 andi andi 1

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:05PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote: > We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote > the attached patch. Great catch you guys ! Thanks for taking a look, I've been busy on other stuff for the past few weeks. Let me go through the issue and proposed code *really* carefully :-). The open code can be really tricky (as you've

Hello, I've been wondering why my no-optimization R-devel builds have been hanging during "building/updating package indices ...". I tracked it down with gdb to this line from do_basename in utils.c: while ( *(p = buf + strlen(buf) - 1) == fsp ) *p = '\0'; Now, imagine if your compiler places the variable fsp immediately before buf on the stack, and strlen(buf) is 0.

Hi All, I was checking the access rights and a problem (hence a question) appeared: Who can delete a file through Samba ? Suppose we have the following situation: drwxrwxrwx john finance directory -rw-r--r-- jack finance directory/file Under unix everyone can delete the file. Under Samba, the documentation says (due to the Windows sementic) you also need the write access to the

So last week I was wondering if XFS was still working -- even with its last on-disk structure changes -- and it _suprisingly_ worked as expected. Right, now I can finally get rid of GRUB and use Syslinux to boot my Linux on EFI from a rootfs with xfs. Shit, I have two partitions (the first one being the required ESP) so there is no way to access the other partitions since because Syslinux does not

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ========================================================== == == Subject: Potential Denial of Service bug in smbd == CVE ID#: CVE-2007-0452 == == Versions: Samba 3.0.6 - 3.0.23d (inclusive) == == Summary: A logic error in the deferred open code == can lead to an infinite loop in smbd ==

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ========================================================== == == Subject: Potential Denial of Service bug in smbd == CVE ID#: CVE-2007-0452 == == Versions: Samba 3.0.6 - 3.0.23d (inclusive) == == Summary: A logic error in the deferred open code == can lead to an infinite loop in smbd ==

Hi, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction. My samba version is samba-4.2.10-6.2.el7_2.x86_64. I have lots of daily core dumps (~20 on each machine daily) and I have no clear idea why. I'm including the stack trace below. It looks like the problem is related to "invalid lock_order". Any ideas? Thanks, Sergei #0 0x00007fc5a34945f7 in raise () from

I have an intermittent problem with dangling MS Access DB lock files. In a productive environment with N batch queus (each on a separate Windows XP Professional) a scheduler PC dispatches the work load to a free queue by means of modifying a simple MS Access DB file called "PRIM.mdb", which resides on a Samba 3.0.20 share. Each free queue PC polls the same MS Access DB file every 60

i've already install samba ver 2.2.1a and many people tell me to upgrade into newer version of samba, i've new version like 2.2.8 but it cannot installed beacuse man dependencies files has to be upgrade any one can help me how to upgrade samba into high version step by step.....!! =========================================================================================== "Gabung