similar to: strange behaviour in file timestamp on smbfs

Unfortunately that didn?t work for me! I think there may be a bug somewhere although its possible that I have done something wrong somewhere. My reason for saying this is everything works perfectly when the windows machine is "uploading" the files but not when rsync is copying them. Regards Nic Colledge colledge@dsl.pipex.com n.j.colledge@bradford.ac.uk -----Original

Hello, I?m using samba version 3.0.1-Debian rsync version 2.6.0 protocol version 27 And mount version 2.12 With kernel 2.4.22 As far as in aware these are the latest versions in Debian unstable. The problem im having is when mirroring my mp3 collection file names with characters like ? ? ? etc. are not displayed in the linux filesystem and then when browsing to the directory through samba

I have a problem with timestamps. Files that are being modified/copies/etc coming from QNX hosts that are mounting the samba share using mount smbfs against a samba server running Sun Solaris 9. If the two servers are in the same time zone, the time stamps are correct. However if the QNX host is in the Eastern Time zone for example, the timestamp on the file is in the future. The time zone for

Here's a curly one. I have a share mounted via smbfs on my linux desktop. This share is on a NetApp filer somewhere, but I've also tried this on a an old linux server as well, and I have the same problem. Basically, since day light savings came into effect here (NZDT or +13), any file I create on the share gets a time creation timestamp that is way out (approximately 12 hours and 48

Hello all. Our system consists of two linux machines, each running Red Hat 7.1 (kernel 2.4.9-34), using SMB to mount multiple shares hosted by a Windows 2000 Advance Server. smbclient from Samba 2.2.5 is used to do the actual mounting. Over the weekend, a number of files on these SMBFS shares were created with incorrect timestamps (modification times). In some cases, the timestamps were off by

After installing kernel 2.6.0 on a samba client machine, the following problem occurred: The server: One machine in the networks acts as a file server using samba 2.2.3. (Debian-Woody). It exports one share to the network. The directory structure below that share contains a few subdirectories as well as a few sym links pointing to directories on other hard disks in the server machine. Samba is

Hi Urban smbfs modifies some memory after free... smb_get_length: Invalid NBT packet, code=4a smb_add_request: request [d828617c, mid=1802201963] timed out! Slab corruption: start=d828617c, expend=d8286287, problemat=d8286184 Last user: [<ec992e35>](smb_free_request+0x45/0x4c [smbfs]) Data: ********6A

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-06:16.smbfs Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: smbfs chroot escape Category: core Module: smbfs Announced: 2006-05-31 Credits:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-06:16.smbfs Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: smbfs chroot escape Category: core Module: smbfs Announced: 2006-05-31 Credits:

Vlad. I still got the same problem - 'ls | wc -l' returned incorretc numbers. I installed the following patches with the sequence vs. the kerner 2.4.18: 1. 00-smbfs-2.4.18-codepage.patch.gz 2. 01-smbfs-2.4.18-lfs.patch.gz 3. 02-smbfs-2.4.18-unicode.patch.gz 4. smbfs-2.4.19-pre9-readdir.patch After installed patches, I ran 'make modules' and so on. Any more

The patch below makes some needlessly global functions static. diffstat output: fs/smbfs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/smbfs/proc.c | 6 +++--- fs/smbfs/proto.h | 5 ----- fs/smbfs/request.c | 6 ++++-- 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> --- linux-2.6.10-mm1-full/fs/smbfs/proto.h.old 2005-01-04 00:57:42.000000000 +0100

I know smbfs is not samba, but perhaps somebody here has seen this error before. Basically, I can't use smbfs: [root@pandora samba]# mount //buildmaster/andreas -o username=andreas -t smbfs /mnt/smbfs added interface ip=10.0.17.30 bcast=10.0.23.255 nmask=255.255.248.0 error connecting to 10.0.16.6:445 (Connection refused) Password: [root@pandora samba]# ls -la /mnt/smbfs ls: /mnt/smbfs:

I periodically see smbfs questions get asked on this list, and they usually get one of two responses: 1. smbfs is a kernel module; this list is not the appropriate place to be asking smbfs questions. 2. You should be using cifs instead. (Please let me know if either if these is incorrect.) I was surprised to see, however, that the smbmount / mount.smbfs manpage makes no mention of cifs as being

I'm using Samba & smbfs to make directories on a Linux file server available across a switched Gigabit network. Unfortunately, when mounting the shares to another Linux system with smbfs, the performance is terrible. To test the setup, I created both a 100mb and 650mb file and transferred them with ftp, smbclient, and smbfs (mounted share). I also used iperf to send each file, just out of

My apologies in advance if this is considered off-topic, but I'm trying to install a Linux devel kernel (2.1.53) and Linus' CHANGES doc tells me I need smbfs 2.1.0 to compile the SAMBA stuff. Installed SAMBA: 1.9.18p5-50.6 Installed smbfs: 2.0.1-2 Question is: I can't find any smbfs code later than 2.0.1-2 on ftp.redhat.com. I've looked at the SAMBA pages and used the search

First I will apologize for posting my patch here if this is not the correct place to post a patch. I know that smbfs is being removed, but we still use it and need it to work. We have a patch to contribute back to the smbfs in the 2.6 kernel. I have noticed multiply posts on this issue and we have basically patch the smbiod.c to fix the reconnect bug in 2.6 Something we did for our patch is

Hello everyone I have recently reported problems reading a certain directory from an NT server on this list (and speculated in causes). I have a few workarounds and now I'm looking for some feedback on what the proper fix is and for people to test if my patch works for them. Please test smbfs with and without the patch on the directory in this zipfile (all files are empty):

Can someone share the smbfs-2.4.19-pre9-readdir.patch. -----Original Message----- From: David.Lee@bisus.com [mailto:David.Lee@bisus.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:21 PM To: vlads@sympatico.ca; urban@teststation.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; David.Lee@bisus.com Subject: [Samba] RE: [PATCH] smbfs readdir fix (CFT: NetApp, OS/2) Vlad. I still got the same problem - 'ls | wc -l'

Hi! Here's a patch that allows Linux smbfs to list large directories (i.e. > 100 items) when talking to an OS/2 server. There is a misunderstanding about the flags sent in the FINDFIRST request which causes the OS/2 server to indicate an EOS (end of search) in the FINDFIRST response, even when there are more items to be listed. The result is that smbfs will display only the first ~120

Hi, I'm not sure if this is the right group/list for this type of help, so I appologize if it isn't, and ask if you can please direct me to the right place. I am trying to mount a NAS Samba share to my RHEL 4 machine to run backups and am running into some slight issues / error msgs with it. I am not sure what samba version the NAS is running, however. It is a Maxtor Shared Storage