similar to: LDAP Supplementary Groups not recognised

I was wondering if any one else is having issues with supplementary groups not being recognized. It seems as if Samba is ignoring the sup.groups. I'm using RH9.0 on Intel with samba-3.0.0-2_rh9 and OpenLDAP 2.0.27. When I do a "id -a username" the user is in all the necessary groups but when accessing shares the users' primary GID is used only. For example, uid=1001(jgray)

I have a very simple Samba 3.0.1 install without LDAP/ADS/winbind support compiled into it. I have noticed a strange problem with supplementary groups I noticed with Mac OS X (10.3.2). The SAMBA server is using 'ntdomain' authentication. When someone connects to the SAMBA server and gives their username in uppercase (the OS's default), then none of the secondary UNIX groups the

We observe a difference between a Windows 7 client and Windows 2003/XP client when accessing directories that should be accessible via the UNIX accounts primary group GID. Windows client refuses access. Ignoring for now why the two different client behaviours (either some subtle difference in the requests or the way the Samba reply is dealt with) the question is what should be the correct

Is there a signal that can be sent to the smbd process, or some other method to tell smbd to reload the user's supplementary unix groups? We do not use Windows Domains and all access to files is controlled using Linux ACLs and supplementary groups defined using a web interface. Currently, when a new posix group is created and given access to a folder, the members of the group do not gain

Dear, I am having a problem configuring Samba 4 domain member. The main server works only as AD and the second one will be for file sharing. Looking at the logs I see errors like: "UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups" Logs: https://pastebin.com/BR1W0X3E smb.conf: https://pastebin.com/B5Ve41KG Does anyone know what can it be? Thanks!

Greetings, We are having some rights issues on Samba 3.6.18 running on Slackware64 14.0 (the official Slackware Package). One of our users is having access issues and I believe I have traced the problem to the following entry in the log.smbd: Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups Issuing the groups command for this user returns the 8 Linux groups in which the user has

All - I seem to be suffering from the common complaint that users loose supplementary group access after a while - in our case it seems to be connections left overnight. Restarting smb fixes it. I haven't been able to determine the cause. From the logs I've been able to determine a bad access looks something like this: AuthZ reports a S-1-5-21- SID: [2020/05/14 09:49:40.474490,

> > It might help if you told us how Extreme advised you to configure it. https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/How_To/How-to-set-internal-RADIUS-server-on-WiNG-with-LDAP-based-authentication http://www.michaelfmcnamara.com/files/motorola/WING5X_How_To_Active_Directory_Authentication_Rev_B.pdf https://www.manualslib.com/manual/1150860/Motorola-Wing-5-7-1.html

I'm trying to solve this issue I'm having where using 'valid users = +unixgroup' just plain doesn't work. I can't find any /documented/ reason why this is so, but nevertheless, it seems to be the case. This is with samba 3.6.18, but seems to exist in all of 3.6.x and most or all of 3.5.x and perhaps earlier as well (see bug #6681). From what I can tell, the underlying

On 14/05/2020 21:59, Orion Poplawski via samba wrote: > Sorry, I thought I had re-enabled delivery, but I had not. So trying to reply > to Rowland Penny here: > >> On 14/05/2020 18:46, Orion Poplawski via samba wrote: >>> All - >>> >>> I seem to be suffering from the common complaint that users loose >>> supplementary group access after a

Ok... This is annoying. Winbind doesn't seem to be 100% stable. I am using 3.0.4 and Winbind is attached to a Windows 2003 server. I am cheating, using RPC rather than ADS. So here is the issue. Generally everything works. I do a wbinfo -u and all comes back. I do a getent passwd and a good list comes back as well. The problem is sometimes with individual users, I do a "getent passwd

My Cisco 7905 can't register with Asterisk (1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC7k on Debian stable). It could, however, register with another installation of Asterisk and the settings on the phone (apart from the SIP proxy address) haven't changed since then. On the new Asterisk box my sip.conf contains this: [jeremy] type=friend regexten=801 allow=g729 host=dynamic secret=PASSWORD nat=yes

Hi , I am using the plot function for some data , and the plot is coming back pure black , with scales on the side . Regards Malcolm [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi Peter, Sorry if I was not clear. Perhaps an example will make my point: > data(iris) > class(iris$Species) [1] "factor" > write.table(iris,'data/myiris.tab') > data(myiris) > class(myiris$Species) [1] "factor" > rm(myiris) > options(stringsAsFactors = FALSE) > data(myiris) > class(myiris$Species) [1] "factor" >

On 29 November 2016 at 17:38, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > I see, but I looked over your proposed implementation from earlier in the > thread, and if I'm not mistaken I see this: That's a different suggestion. > That said, what did you think about my other proposal of the complicated UDL > with macro? > > #define LIT(x) x_string_ref_literal >

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/chipsets/5520-and-5500-chipset-ioh-specification-update.html Stepping B-3 has two errata (#47 and #53) related to Interrupt remapping, to which the workaround is for the BIOS to completely disable interrupt remapping. These errata are fixed in stepping C-2. Unfortunately this chipset is very common and many BIOSes are not disabling remapping. We can

Well, apparently clang has clang::StringLiteral in clang/AST/Expr.h So, our options are either: Allow this name clash (obviously the namespaces don't clash, only the names) and deal with it when it's an issue (which will be limited to clang, and even then not very often), or choose a different name. Thoughts? On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:53 AM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>

Hi, We're using Samba 3.0.0 beta2 with a Windows 2003 domain controller at a client's site. OS: Vanilla Red Hat Linux 8.0 on i686 (no patches or updates). Samba compiled from source into RPM (makerpm.sh) and upgraded from version 2. --with-acl-support enabled. Filesystem: SGI XFS (kernel 2.4.21) from CVS. Using Winbind to provide ID mapping from Windows users and groups to Unix users

Excuse me, i am french.... My SAMBA v3.0.13 (over a linux Redhat 7.3.1 With kernel 2.4.27-4) is configured with " security = ADS " to communicate with Active directory (2003 server). The problem : When i modify the group of a user in the Active directory, this modification is not completely taken into account in samba. In fact the orders "getent" and "wbinfo"

Hi, we want to use ldapsam:trusted=yes to improve performace as nss_ldap is killing our ldap server doing enumeration. once i enable it smbd dies silently... this is the last part of a ./smbd -d 10 -i NT user token: (NULL) UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups smbldap_search: base => [ou=groups,ou=filestore,dc=sunderland,dc=ac,dc=uk], filt er =>