similar to: Users authenticating across domains

Just a quick note to those who care, I received a UCE this morning addressed to samba-337@ccp.com.au, the only place this was used was when emailing to this list. I can only conclude that either the list itself was harvested or someone has gone through the archive and harvested that. The Email actually came from 200.171.136.80 which has an abuse email address of abuse@telesp.net.br The Email

Hello, I am running Debian/sarge and upgraded samba to 3.0 some time ago Since the upgrade I am having an issue with one user connecting to samba. When they try to access the samba file server from any machine (2K/XP) the smbd has a panic and crashes after they put in the login details. Samba continues to operate so I guess the daemon is automatically re-started. This samba box is part of an

Yeah, I was just puzzled :D No worries. Cheers, Sebastian 2014-12-16 11:09 GMT+01:00 Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>: > It looks like I missed that email completely, I started out replying to > Nikola and Hans which is why I was talking about Windows rather than OS X. > > > > I've just found your first email in my llvmdev folder and I think I see what

Thanks. From the debugging I've done so far it looks like it could be another 32-bit big-endian specific bug. It seems to be segfaulting in the memset() in allocate_stack.c (from glib) because given stack pointer is null. I'm guessing this is because it read the wrong half of a 64-bit value somewhere but I haven't identified where it goes wrong. ________________________________________

This is normal. Samba spawns 1 smbd plus 1 for each connected client. If it concerns you that these hang around you can set the deadtime parameter in smb.conf to limit the time they remain live. The default is deadtime=0 which means no automatic termination of unused connections. Set this to the number of minutes to wait before disconnecting an idle connection. I use deadtime=10 on a server

It looks like I missed that email completely, I started out replying to Nikola and Hans which is why I was talking about Windows rather than OS X. I've just found your first email in my llvmdev folder and I think I see what happened. My mail rules deliver llvmdev messages to a folder named llvmdev unless I'm directly addressed in which case it delivers to my inbox. It looks like you

Daniel, Ok, thanks. Simple fix. We'll just make correction in local copy for now, one less thing to port later :) Thanks. On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > I've just looked at my checkout of 3.6 and it looks like the fix wasn't > merged. I don't have the revision number for the fix to hand but in >

Ah, ...no. please don't hesitate to write logs ;) It must be the subject in the buildbot, not in developer guys. Galina, I'll write up later, how to tweak this issue. It is not resolved in released versions, though. The easiest way is to tweak svnpoller. 2013/11/16 Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>: > That would explain it. The commit messages were quite long

> On 15.12.2014, at 15:45, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> On Behalf Of Sebastian Dreßler >> Sent: 15 December 2014 14:08 >> Cc: Ben Pope; Nikola Smiljanic; llvmdev >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase

I've just noticed that this is a new test added in r248325 and has never passed on this builder. Added the author of the test (Evgeniy). From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev Sent: 01 October 2015 20:34 To: David Blaikie Cc: llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-cmake-mips > > I do. I'll take

Hi, It's changed a few times over the last year. I believe xdg-open spawns whichever application your desktop environment would use to open the file so you should be able to tell it to use dotty. From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Taylor via llvm-dev Sent: 11 August 2015 00:30 To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [llvm-dev] Fwd: [LLVMdev]

The diff is not only the && and || but also the leading !: diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp index 58f029fbe9fc..7ee06fc153b2 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ void SelectionDAGISel::CodeGenAndEmitDAG() {

I've just looked at my checkout of 3.6 and it looks like the fix wasn't merged. I don't have the revision number for the fix to hand but in lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp, this: MatchFilterBB = (!FilterDAGBasicBlockName.empty() && FilterDAGBasicBlockName == FuncInfo->MBB->getBasicBlock()->getName().str());

> -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] > Sent: 15 May 2015 14:15 > To: Daniel Sanders > Cc: Tom Stellard; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 3.6.1 -rc1 has been tagged. Testing begins. > > On 15 May 2015 at 13:34, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> > wrote: > > Not

Good point. The same argument seems to apply to copy() too so I suppose it depends how strict we want to be about it. From: fglaser at apple.com [mailto:fglaser at apple.com] On Behalf Of escha at apple.com Sent: 11 April 2016 20:55 To: Daniel Sanders Cc: Alex Rosenberg; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Carlos Liam Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Implementing a proposed InstCombine optimization On Apr 11,

I've looked at it a bit more and an updated ninja is part of it. You also need build.ninja to contain 'pool = console' on the lit rules. I added it manually to try it out but presumably a cmake update is needed to add this automatically. ________________________________ From: Renato Golin [renato.golin at linaro.org] Sent: 23 December 2014 00:55 To: David Blaikie Cc: LLVM Dev; Daniel

Ah, it appears that I have confused myself... I indeed have ALL of the queues defined as JetDirect with the model specific driver selected in printconf. With this combination I am telling linux to modify the job [via the filter] and then pass it as a RAW [jetdirect] where I SHOULD just have the queue define as JetDirect with a RAW as the driver and let the job go as transmitted by the client

> -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] > Sent: 15 May 2015 12:51 > To: Daniel Sanders > Cc: Tom Stellard; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 3.6.1 -rc1 has been tagged. Testing begins. > > On 14 May 2015 at 21:39, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> > wrote: > >

Greetings, Hoping someone can shed some light on this. I've been searching for over a week and cannot find information on how Samba generates SID's from Unix UID's and GID's. I keep running into situations where after adding a new user to my CentOS server all other users are suddenly prevented from accessing shares that have a group ACL assigned. I finally figured out that

Hi All, We have four domains setup for The Couch: thecouch.org.nz, thecouch.co.nz, www.thecouch.org.nz and www.thecouch.co.nz. They are all handled by the same rails app. The means that fragment caching creates four folders in our cache directory, named after each URL. This introduces two problems: 1: We are caching 4 times as much stuff as necessary 2: Our cache sweepers are only sweeping one