similar to: TSM on ext3

All, Can anyone confirm that Samba/Solaris will integrate with TSM (Tivoli Storage Manager) when deployed into a Wintel client environment. ie. Solaris/Samba as a TSM client - we need to be sure that the ACL's will be maintained correctly via a TSM backup/restore (full or partial) Or confirm this does not work, which is not what we want to hear - but the truth will suffice. Many thanks,

Hi We have been trying back-up a glusterfs (v3.1.4) area using the Tivoli TSM software to an off-site area. The back-up keeps failing with the following typical error messages 06/14/2011 22:22:58 ANS1587W I/O error reading file attributes for: /gdata/projects/philex/OAG/2011/May16/mdor3km10/coast_den2.in. errno = 22, Invalid argument 06/14/2011 22:22:59 ANS4007E Error processing

Hi! I am using SAMBA 3.5.x and it doesn't work with IBM TSM. IBM TSM works properly with SAMBA 3.2.15. Is there any chance to solve this issue in future SAMBA versions? Best regards /Adrian Berlin -- You Rock! Your E-Mail Should Too! Signup Now at Rock.com and get 2GB of Storage! http://connections.rock.com/user/displayUserRegisterPage.kickAction?as=116748&STATUS=MAIN

Hi, I'm curious if you have any updates regarding this problem. I'm facing exactly the same issue. When I'm trying to make a backup with IBM TSM of a Samba share mounted under Windows, I keep receiving the error message that "required NT privilege is not held". This problem started to appear when I migrated to Samba 3.5.x. With previous Samba versions, IBM TSM was able to

I appear to have a broken filesystem on this box to the point where I am probably going to rebuild the system since I have lost trust in it.... I was wondering if there was any reasonable postmortum work I could do on it before it gets rebuilt. History is that the laptop has a much mauled partition set on it - initially it came with 100% win2k, I then shrunk that and added linux (a RH71 install

I'm running samba 3.0.23c on aix 5.3 TL4. I'm using Tivoli HSM 5.3.4.0 on a JFS2 filesystem. Samba compiled fine, and I set "dmapi support = yes" in smb.conf, but samba wouldn't recognize offline files ("migrated files" in tsm terminology). After setting a higher log level I think I've tracked down the problem. The patch is at the bottom of this email.

Hi! playing with --include, --exclude, and --exclude-from=file I found these not working: xcnlm00s:/etc/adsm/script # rsync -navx --include="*/" --exclude="*" -e ssh newsfeed:/ receiving file list ... done wrote 29 bytes read 28605 bytes 3014.11 bytes/sec total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 xcnlm00s:/etc/adsm/script # rsync -navx --exclude="*"

I'd been hoping to move all of our site to ssh protocol 2 whilst we are still small enough to do this without serious pain, however the lack of authentication and connection forwarding is making that difficult at present. I see the current (2.2.0p1) code base does not have the code on either client or server side for ssh2 to handle tunneled connections or authentication agent. Is this

Hello, I moved my ssh servers to openssh and installed: openssh-1.2.1pre25 via .rpm My problem is that X11 forwarding doesn't work. -/etc/ssh/sshd_config X11Forwarding yes X11DisplayOffset 10 I start sshd with defaul port and can connect to the server and then: $ xosview X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. X connection to servername.de:10.0 broken (explicit kill or

Long ago, when I wrote the ssh config file on my desktop box, ssh (which might have been the non-openssh one) took 3 possible values for the StrictHostKeyChecking option - yes, no & ask. Today, when I attempted to connect to a new machine, with no DNS entries (so using IP address) from my desktop box, ssh (now 2.3.0p1) SEGVed. Looks like there is some subtle interaction between having an

This appears to be rather poorly supported compared to the rsa key equivalent... The man page implies that ~/.ssh/authorized_keys & ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 are similar format. In fact the code will only read DSA keys from the ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 file - the options entries are not supported, and putting options in causes key recognition to fail. I guess ideally the key reader needs

I've currently got a couple of boxes which obtain their IP address via DHCP, and as a consequence do not have a mapping in /etc/hosts for their own IP/name... but helpfully (!) they have their name mapping to 127.0.0.1 This breaks X authentication... - openssh (and also ssh) makes an apparently valid xauth entry, but all attempts to start clients gives "X11 connection rejected

I have set up SAMBA on AIX 4.2 and can attach to NT shares and vice versa. I acquired and configured SAMBA for basically one reason, that being to gain WINS client capabilities for AIX. Right now it's not working as expected, though. I am implementing Tivoli, and Tivoli requires a bidirectional name to address resolution in order to register the managed node agent with the Framework. I

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7618 Summary: symlinks and --link-dest Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: the_majkl at seznam.cz QAContact:

Hi, To to build an RPM from the nut 2.0.3 source I've corrected the old nut.spec.in file. Please find a copy of the slightly updated spec file attached. The changes are documented at the bottom of the spec file. Regards, Will -------------- next part -------------- # don't know how different I can do this %define majorver 2.0 %define version 2.0.3 %define relver 1 %define nutuser

Hi - I was wondering if any of you may be able to point me in the right direction. I am in the process of designing a fairly large fileserver solution in an MS Active directory environment. I have setup and tested ctdb samba, however, after several discussions with a couple of my colleagues, i am now considering a more vanilla flavour of samba. The key features the solution requires are: •

Ole.H.Nielsen@fysik.dtu.dk wrote: > > SAMBA grabs ALL available semaphores minus 1 on SunOS 4.1.3, > where the kernel has 60, see /usr/include/sys/sem.h: > #define SEMMNS 60 /* # of semaphores in system */ > > This is a MAJOR PROBLEM to us, since our backup software > (IBM ADSM) also needs available semaphores for the client > part to work. Hence we can

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone might be able to speak about using IBM's GPFS filesystem as a means of storing virtual guests in a clustered environment with CentOS as the nodes and KVM as the hypervisor? I'm looking at using IBM's TSM software for archiving data from disk to tape. This requires buying a license for GPFS which is used in conjunction with TSM but can also be used

Is there any more docs on this other then the blurb on beta.redhat.com? I got a spare non-critical victim err... test machine I want to try this on and have all the RPMS, but would really like to chew on a little more detail before I leap. Regards, Henri -- "People die." --The Cynic's Book of Wisdom

Ever since I upgraded from Samba 1.9.18 to 2.0.0, I've been having problems with applications started from a Samba share dying silently, or with an Illegal Instruction message, on NT 4.0 Workstation. Since the only configuration change has been the Samba upgrade, that would seem to be the orgin of the problem. Below is my smb.conf file, in case I have something configured (or not configured)