similar to: Samba Support - DOES IT WORK?

from another post today about a different topic, the reply said that nmd has some issue restarting with a service smb restart in redhat 7.3..which seems to answer my question as to why I have to do it twice... thanks > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris McKeever > Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 10:35 AM > To: 'John H Terpstra'; _Chris McKeever_ > Cc:

Folks, FYI. -- John H Terpstra Email: jht@samba.org ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:47:50 +0000 (GMT) From: John H Terpstra <jht@samba.org> To: Malte Weber <m_weber@wiwa.de> Cc: samba-technical@samba.org Subject: Re: netatalk/samba On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Malte Weber wrote: > Hi John, > > I unfortunately wasn't able to attend SambaXP,

Denis, I have checked this and verify that this is a bug. You can track the progress towards fixing this from https://bugzilla.samba.org as bug #210. Thanks for the feedback. - John T. On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Denis Heitbrock wrote: > supplement: > [Verkauf] > vfs objects = extd_audit recycle > vfs object = recycle:repository=.recycle recycle:versions=True > recycle:touch=True

Thanks fort he advice John, i read that on the link that nome sent. I filled it out in the smb.conf, and edited the usermap file, then restarted the smb server, and it didn't work *shrugs* it works fine with ftp, so that'll do for now. Thanks anyway. Cheers, -brian -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: John H Terpstra [mailto:jht@samba.org] Gesendet: 17 September 2003 15:04 An: Brian

On Mon, 5 May 2003, Anthony Watters wrote: > Since I have Samba working already, is there a way to install just SWAT? ie; > *.tar.gz file? No need if you have already installed the SWAT RPM. > > I did also try and re-install the RPM file samba-swat-2.2.7a.9.0.i386.rpm > using the rpm manager. it seemed to take 5 seconds, so I am not sure what > really occurred other than SWAT

hi, may i ask some stupid question. :) I am using Samba 2.2.8a, how should i do if i don't want upgrade to the = latest version of Samba but use the *.patch file? And there are so many patch files, should i patch every file to my = system? If the affected release of a patch file is "3.0.x <=3D 3.0.6", dose it = mean this security issue just affect version 3.0.x and my system

revised to prevent confusion, sorry -----Original Message----- From: steven.TSE Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 3:30 PM To: John H Terpstra Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: [Samba] group problem on NT4 domain Yes, winbindd is running and nsswitch.conf is configured as: passwd: file winbind shadow: file group: file winbind smb.conf ======= [global] workgroup = NTDOM server string =

What's means, can I have some problem with this configuration ? Or it's just a speed problem ? St?phane John H Terpstra

Hi, I have installed samba 2.2.7 and cannot get swat to work. I have entry in /etc/services file and alo in /etc/xinetd.d/swat. I'm logging in as root/rootpassword from local or other machine. i'm getting error 401 Bad Authorization username or password incorrect What am i doing wrong??? Thanks Mohan -----Original Message----- From: samba-request@lists.samba.org

------- Forwarded Message Return-Path: hurricane-list-request@redhat.com Return-Path: <hurricane-list-request@redhat.com> Received: from innovace.aquasoft.com.au (jht@innovace.aquasoft.com.au [192.245.14.12]) by innovace.aquasoft.com.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA00772 for <jht@innovace.aquasoft.com.au>; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 18:49:03 +1100 Received: from aqua.aquasoft.com.au by

> 6) RE: Encryption > by John H Terpstra <jht@aquasoft.com.au> >------------------------------ > >Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 18:10:53 +1000 >From: John H Terpstra <jht@aquasoft.com.au> >To: "'redhat-list@redhat.com'" <redhat-list@redhat.com> >Cc: "'samba@samba.anu.edu.au'" <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> >Subject: RE:

Paul, Your samba does have ACLs support built-in. Please check that your system has the ACLs support libraries. Since you are using kernel 2.4.x you need to have the bestbits acls support libraries installed on your machine. Check the documentation for XFS to see how to mount the XFS file system so it has ACLs support. You should manually be able to set POSIX ACLs using the setfacls utility.

The following is a description of an rpm-based rsync build problem on my Redhat 7.1 system, and a patch that fixed the spec file. The problem occurred on several recent rsync releases, including 2.5.7: rpm -tb --define '_topdir /home/user/tmp/rpmbuild' rsync-2.5.7.tar.gz ALMOST works; it uses the spec file in lsb, not redhat/7.1. This spec file fails due to bad date format in one line,

Found this issue in the list archives, with no resolution. I think I found one. We were having this exact problem, and we resolved it by removing \*.doc\*.DOC\ from our smb.conf "veto oplocks" list, and adding \*.tmp\*.TMP\. Leaving the *.tmp files out of the veto list was causing Word 2000 to say that a file was currently locked by 'another user', even when the file was just

Ashlee Vance's article on R in the New York Times. This is typical of the New York Times. Because they get to coast on the prestige and reputation of their brand , they have a history of just this sort of journalistic sloppiness. Whether it's the author or the editor at fault doesn't really matter, they do this screw-up all the time. Look, if you write an article on the first page of

I've had the chance to give 2.2.7a a try, with no change in behavior. LabView still takes several minutes to load, and disk utilization shoots way up. Just to see what would happen, I tried Samba 2.2.5 and got the same results. I then dropped back to 2.2.4, and everything works fine. LabView loads in about 12 seconds, disk utilization stays low during the load, no locking errors appear in

----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE stephane.purnelle@corman.be Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467 John H Terpstra <jht@samba.org>

John, I haven't done any direct performance testing, although I am planning on figuring that out now. (BTW, how is performance testing ran?) However, I can say that since converting over to the Samba PDC/File Server that the file transfer performance just feels much faster. Regards, Robert Adkins II IT Manager/Buyer Impel Industries, Inc. Ph. 586-254-5800 Fx. 586-254-5804

I accidently replied to the individual instead of the message board when I sent this the first time. Chris Wright Network Specialist Information Technology Outreach Services (ITOS) University of Georgia (706) 542-1976 cwright@itos.uga.edu -----Original Message----- From: Chris Wright Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 10:05 AM To: 'John H Terpstra' Subject: RE: [Samba] force group parameter

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, kaze wrote: > --> From: John H Terpstra [mailto:jht@samba.org] > --> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:04 AM > ... > > Of course "net ads join ..." still returns "failed: Cannot find KDC for > > requested realm" > > Hmmm. ... > > > > > What to do? > > Did the Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf help in any