similar to: samba and winbind group ID?

Hi I am testing running tinc in switch mode. , my topology is as follows Site 1 (tinc-srv01) -> Site 2 (tinc-srv02) I have configured the bridge interfaces with ip addresses and able to ping between bridges. I then setup a server on each site and tested layer 2 connectivity between the two servers. Topology as follows. Server 1 - *Site 1* (tinc-srv01) -> *Site 2* (tinc-srv02) - Server 2

Hello Yazeed, Am Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:26:55 +0300 schrieb Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at gmail.com>: > [..] > > *Site 1* > Server -ping- Site 1 (tinc-srv01) - Success > Server -ping- Site 2 (tinc-srv02) - Success > Server -ping- Site 2 - Server 2 - Failure > > > *Site 2* > Server -ping- Site 2 (tinc-srv02) - Success > Server -ping- Site 1 (tinc-srv01) -

Hi Lars Thank you for reply. My apologies it is running in "*TAP*" mode. root at tinc-srv:~# tincd -n netname -D -d3 tincd 1.0.23 (Dec 5 2013 17:16:47) starting, debug level 3 /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tap mode) I have enabled ip forwarding and it seems that bridging rules is enabled root at tinc-srv02:~# cat /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables 1 root at

Hello there! After much trial and error, scouring the net and books for samba setups/faqs/resources, etc - I seem to have Samba setup with winbind more or less correctly - There seems to be a couple bugs though. The goal is to have a windows workstation-like Linux box to access the NT 4.0 domain. Logging into the Linux box (physically) with domain user accounts, accessing domain printers,

I've managed to configure a LVS Cluster to act as a transparent proxy squid farm, with a virtual server as load balancer, and three real servers. Because redirecting packets going to port 80 to port 3128 of squid in the load balancer doesn't works, the solution has a mix of ip route and iptables. Here is the script I wrote to configure transparent proxy. #!/bin/bash #Transparent proxy

Hi all, By some days around 12:00 o'clock I have the following problem with my SUSE Linux 2.6.11.4-21.9-default i686 i386 GNU/Linux, with Samba Version 3.0.21a-0.1-SUSE: xxx:~ # tail /var/log/samba/log.machine01 [2006/02/23 12:05:54, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(180) Failed to verify incoming ticket! [2006/02/23 12:06:04, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(772)

Hello, i've got the following setup windows nt4 server sp6 samba 3.0 alpha 24 (debian) running with security=server i'm trying the following thing: srv01:/etc/ldap# smbclient //srv01/darks -U darks Password: OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba] smb: \> quit srv01:/etc/ldap# getent passwd jack jack:x:501:500:Ulrich Eck:/home/jack:/bin/bash srv01:/etc/ldap# net rap user ADD jack secret -U

Hi... I have had a problem when I am going to detach one specific LVM partitions of Xen, so I have been trying xm destroy <domain>, lvchange -an <lvm_partition>, lvremove -f.... So I haven''t had sucess. I restarted the server with init 1 yet and nothing... I have seem two specific process started xenwatch and xenbus, but I am not sure if this processes have some action over

Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. Any fix about this issue? May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5)

The referenced GitHub issue now has a potential patch that could fix the problem, though it will need to be verified. Could you try to apply the patch and check if the problem persists ? On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 2:10?AM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. > > Any fix about this issue? > > May 14 07:05:39

Hi Xavi That's depend. Is it safe? I have this env production you know??? --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 ?s 07:45, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan at redhat.com> escreveu: > The referenced GitHub issue now has a potential patch that could fix the > problem, though it will need to be verified. Could you try to apply the

Hi Gilberto, On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 12:56?PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Xavi > That's depend. Is it safe? I have this env production you know??? > It should be safe, but I wouldn't test it on production. Can't you try it in any test environment before ? Xavi > > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > (47) 99676-7530 -

Ok. No problem. I can test it in a virtual environment. Send me the path. Oh but the way, I don't compile gluster from scratch. I was used the deb file from https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/Debian/ --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 ?s 09:21, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan at redhat.com> escreveu: >

hi all! i have a very strange problem with samba: when i try to copy some files with samba the connection freeze and after some time i get can read in my log file: Sep 16 22:47:35 srv01 smb_add_request: request [dd6d1e40, mid=29034] timed out! Sep 16 22:48:36 srv01 smb_add_request: request [dd6d1e40, mid=34953] timed out! Sep 16 22:49:06 srv01 smb_add_request: request [dd6d1e40, mid=34954]

Hi again I just noticed that there is some updates from glusterd apt list --upgradable Listing... Done glusterfs-client/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] glusterfs-common/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] glusterfs-server/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] libgfapi0/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] libgfchangelog0/unknown 11.0-2 amd64

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 4:00?PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi again > I just noticed that there is some updates from glusterd > > apt list --upgradable > Listing... Done > glusterfs-client/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] > glusterfs-common/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] > glusterfs-server/unknown 11.0-2

Anybody also has this error? May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5) [0x7fb4ebad41a5] ) 0-: Assertion failed: May 14

Hello, Server rsyncd [root@data1 steve]# rsync --version rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29 [root@data1 steve]# uname -a Linux data1.contact-24-7.local 2.6.9-55.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Jun 26 14:30:58 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root@data1 steve]# Client rsync [root@srv01 cron.daily]# rsync --version rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29 [root@srv01 cron.daily]# uname -a

Hello, i am using samba4rc2. I have problems with the bind9 dlz module, i get very long response times from interal queries. root at s-srv01:~# dig s-srv04.test.local @192.168.0.4 ; <<>> DiG 9.8.0-P4 <<>> s-srv04.test.local @192.168.0.4 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 64478 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra;

Can someone help me because I don't how this ha+ppening without messing it ? /var/log/samba/log.wb-COMPANY cli_rpc_open failed on pipe \NETLOGON to machine SRV01. Error was Write error: Broken pipe [2005/10/27 12:15:01, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:cli_rpc_close(1767) cli_rpc_open failed on pipe \NETLOGON to machine SRV01. Error was Write error: Broken pipe [2005/10/27 12:15:01, 0]