Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "How To Fix Duplication Block Error?"
2002 Apr 22
0
(no subject)
Hi there,
I am very new in linux and met the filesystem problem as described in the
following, I tried to use 'fsck' and tried to find some support documents
but failed. Your hints and helps are very appreciated.
Millions of thanks,
Annie
The error message is (sorry for it's length, I just want to make it clear)
====================================================================
2005 Jan 03
2
Attempting To Recover, fsck infinite looping on me
Hey all,
Had a power failure and subsequent ext3 disk corruptions. Attempting
to fix, but not working.
Its a 120 gig IDE disk, 3 partitions. /boot, /, and swap.
Basically can't boot up since the box can't get to the system files
in /usr/ or anything.
So I'm booting off of a FC2 disk 1 in recovery mode and trying to fix
the filesystem with e2fsck
The boot partition cleaned up
2001 Nov 02
3
Ext3 and external journals...
Hi,
I am trying out ext3 with an external journal (on a battery backed
RAM card). I use data=journal, and sync nfs writes go nice and fast :-)
But.. I had to power cycle it (buggy VM.. grumble :-) and now I cannot
get my filesystem back. It is only a test filesystem so I don't need
the data. But I want this to work before I put real data on it.
If I "fsck /dev/md1", it
2001 May 11
1
ext3 filesystem lost.
Hello.
We have, over the last few months, lost ext3 filesystems three times.
The whole filesystem left unusable.
nfs-server:~# mount /dev/rd/c0d1p1 /mnt -t ext3
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/rd/c0d1p1,
or too many mounted file systems
(in dmesg)
EXT3-fs: journal inode is deleted.
EXT3-fs: get root inode failed
nfs-server:~# fsck /dev/rd/c0d1p1
Parallelizing
2002 Apr 09
2
couldn't load ext3
Hi
I am running a PC under Linux SuSE 7.2 with kernel 2.4.18, self compiled.
I changed some days ago the partition of my second HD from ext2 to ext3 with the help of tune2fs -j /dev/hdb2 and everything was running OK.
Today, I had a problem with a frozen display and I had to reboot the box cold. During the corresponding forced check I got the following messages:
Quote
---------
/dev/hdb2: reading
2001 Jul 11
4
Is this list active?
I subscribed this morning but have no traffic. Sometimes no traffic is
a good thing. Since I've gone to ext3 on my 2.4.5 kernel, the only
time I ever had problems was when the filesystems were not unmounted
cleanly and the journal was lost. About 60 minutes of searching and
reading and I found out how to recreate the journal.
So far, so pleased with ext3fs.
--
2002 Jun 29
4
help with 2.4.18 oops
Getting this oops on one of our production servers
pretty much hangs the server.
Do we have a corrupted Journal? how would ewe rebuild it?
Any idea how to recover from it?
Assertion failure in journal_bmap() at journal.c:636: "ret != 0"
invalid operand: 0000
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[journal_bmap+70/96] Not tainted
EIP: 0010:[<c016b646>] Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010282
2007 Feb 22
3
Very slow ext3 fsck
Hi -
We have an ext3 file system which is 3.5TB in size (on top of lvm). Free are
172049011 out of 854473728 4096K blocks, and 396540654 out of 427245568
inodes. This is using Scientific Linux 4.4 (a RHEL clone). The filesystem
consists of multiple backups created with rsync using --link-dest, which
hard links files which haven't been modified to the previous copy. There
are several hundred
2011 Feb 18
1
How to fsck.ocfs2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
simple question: how can I execute a "fsck.ocfs2 /dev/sdf"?
All I get is
- ---snip---
myhost:~ # fsck.ocfs2 /dev/sdf
fsck.ocfs2 1.4.3
Checking OCFS2 filesystem in /dev/sdf:
Label: SAP01
UUID: 5969C8CABB854F8EA9C17B5B8DE48EC6
Number of blocks: 183500800
Block size: 4096
Number of
2010 Nov 30
1
Compiling ocfs2-tools-1.6.3 on slackware64-13.1
Hello all,
I'm having trouble compiling ocfs2-tools-1.6.3 on slackware64-13.1
These are my configure flags (the last 2 I added after googling this problem, but didn't help):
./configure \
--sbindir=/sbin \
--bin=/bin \
--libdir=/usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX} \
--sysconfdir=/etc \
--datadir=/etc/ocfs2 \
--sharedstatedir=/var/ocfs2 \
--libexecdir=/usr/libexec \
2005 Apr 05
1
e2fsck running for hours, printing out lists of numbers -- should I stop it?
I recently rebooted one of my machines and was greeted with a message
about one of my ext3 partitions having some errors. I dutifully started
e2fsck on the partition, but after a few hours of some useful messages
about fixing inodes, it then started printing out lists of ascending
numbers which I'm not sure how to interpret.
The first time I noticed this, these numbers were in the 4000000
2003 Jan 23
3
e2fsck too old / ext3 HTREE errors
hi,
i have a tricky situation here and and don't know where to start with
the solution.
i happened to set up a linux system, but i had to install the base
system on another machine. i used e2fsprogs 1.30-WIP (30-Sep-2002) for
this.
now the machine is up and running, but i have to use e2fsprogs 1.27
(8-Mar-2002). it's a debian system and i wanted to stay sane & stable,
hence using
2008 May 27
2
needs help, root inode gone after usb bus reset on sata disks
Hello everybody,
I am new to this list, so welcome everybody.
Last 2 week I had two harddisk crashes with my ext2 file system.
This is what sort of happed with both of the disk:
I pluged in my USB to SATA converter in my harddisk that has an ext2
filesystem. I mounted the partition, went to a directory that had a DVD
image. I mounted the dvd image in the same directory and started
watching the
2013 Aug 30
2
Strange fsck.ext3 behavior - infinite loop
Greetings! Need your help fellow penguins!
Strange behavior with fsck.ext3: how to remove a long orphaned inode list?
After copying data over from one old RAID to another new RAID with rsync, the dump command would not complete because of filesystem errors on the new RAID. So I ran fsck.ext3 with the -y option and it would just run in an infinite loop restarting itself and then trying to correct
2001 Oct 24
3
a bug in ext3 code for 2.4.7
Hello ,
I use kernel 2.4.7 patched with corresponding ext3 patch. The problem I
have is that when I startup I get a panic in a kernel. I started
to debug util-linux and found that mount does a segmentation fault when
trying to open /etc/mtab file.
The segmentation fault ocurrs on open() call inside mtab_is_writable()
procedure:
printf("mtab_writable: pass 1\n");
if (ret ==
2002 Aug 10
3
ext3_readdir error
Hi,
I am getting the following errors on /boot partition on a production
server running 2.4.18 kernel.
-------------
Aug 10 00:19:37 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,1)):
ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #2: rec_len is smaller than minimal -
offset=0, inode=0, rec_len=0, name_len=0
-------------
/boot is not readable at all and attempt to do an ls will return the same
error.
2014 Sep 20
0
Re: Possible bug in mkfs.ext3
On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:56 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member.
>
> This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run.
>
> I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users Mailing List.
I would
2007 May 18
6
2.6.22-rc1 killed my ext3 filesystem cleanly unmounted
Hi,
I just tried the 2.6.22-r1 candidate to test whether some bug I have
hit in the past still exists. I did use 2.6.20.6 so far. So, I have
cleanly rebooted to use the new kernel, after the machine came up I
tried to mess with the bug, and had to reboot again to play with kernel
commandline parameters. Unfortunately, on the next reboot fsck was
schedules on my filesystem after 38 clean
2014 Sep 20
4
Possible bug in mkfs.ext3
I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member.
This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S
to mkfs,
and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run.
I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users
Mailing List.
The following is the mailing list exchange:
On 09/18/2014 07:01 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On
2006 Jan 19
3
ext3 fs errors 3T fs
Hello,
I looked through the archives a bit and could not find anything relevant,
if you know otherwise please point me in the right direction.
I have a ~3T ext3 filesystem on linux software raid that had been behaving
corectly for sometime. Not to long ago it gave the following error after
trying to mount it:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md0,
or too many