similar to: POSIX to NT ACL bug

Hello , the described bellow happens both in samba 2.2.7a and 3.0-alfa22. First bug: As it is easy to check smbd , when asked about ACL entry of a file never sends to the client OS DENY Access Control Entries , only ALLOW. so for example for a XFS file with acl: # owner: a user::r-- group::rwx other::rwx Win2K security tab shows for user "a": Read & exec =

Wondering if anyone can help... here is my setup: RedHat 7.3 with XFS (using the XFS install disk) After installation I'd downloaded 2.2.7 src rpm from redhat and rebuilt it with the --with-acl-support option in the samba.spec file then upgraded the resulting rpm files I've added the machine accounts and made root a smb user I can log in successfully(after applying the xp registry hack),

Two attached patches for samba 2.2.7a and 3.0-alfa22, that I've made today, fix 3 bugs mentioned in my previous e-mail. 1) For each file in addition to ALLOW ACE proper DENY ACE is created. 2) "Take ownership" is shown DENIED for all except root ACEs 3) Read Permissions and read attributes are always shown as allowed, as they are actually allowed. -- Zhitomirsky

Hi: I want to upgrade a Fedora Core 1 Linux machine that is running Samba 3.0.2a to 3.0.5. Initially, I compiled the 3.0.2a source, with defaults, and installed. The installation resides in /usr/local/samba. Can I download the 3.0.5 source, compile and install without breaking anything? Will the configuration be broken? Does anyone know a way to do this cleanly? Anyone's help is

Hi, Hopefully some Samba gurus are interested in some of my questions about Samba ACL this is more in technical detail. 1. Why Samba always think the owner always has 'READ' access right on a file, 'READ and WRITE' access rights on a directory? I checked the code of posix_acls.c, those bits are OR-ed by default 2. Try to create a folder via the Samba Win2k

I'm not an expert on that, but did you tried the following settings on smb.conf for your share : admin users = NTDOMAIN+Administrator valid users = ..... I think this is necessary to use ACL with samba and ntdomain... -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry@samba.org] Gesendet: Montag, 28. Februar 2005 16:43 An: Juer Lee Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff:

I'm looking for info on using posix acls in samba. I'd like them to look and feel like nt acls. I'd like to use the windows client to set the acls on the samba server. I've got the official samba 3 howto book, but can't seem to figure things out from there. specifically, in the past I've used a force group entry in combined with create modes to keep shared files access to

List, I had Samba 3.0 running on Debian Lenny configured to use POSIX ACLs on ext3. They worked fine, or at least as fine as NT -> POSIX mapping ever did. After testing 3.3 with acl_xattr on using a different machine, I decided to give it a whirl on the production server. And yes, I know it's experimental. I defined a share thusly: vfs objects = acl_xatt acl map full

04.12.2023 11:12, ??????? ?????? ????????? via samba ?????: > Hello, > > > > We need to migrate our AD from NT PDC Schema Version 88 to Samba PDC, but we can't join our Samba to NT PDC or migrate SID History and Account Passwords to Samba PDC. > > > > Our company is over 3000 NT Servers and over 5000 Users and we need to migrate to Samba without Servers rejoin and

Dear all, Yesterday, from the customer's code I observed relatively simple case, where Polly is unable to detect parallelizable outer loop. Consider two versions of Fortran routine: 1) subroutine filter(H, szh, X, szx, Y, szy) implicit none integer(kind=IKIND), intent(in) :: szh, szx, szy real(kind=RKIND), intent(in) :: H(szh), X(szx) real(kind=RKIND), intent(out) :: Y(szy)

I am new to CentOS and have installed the dgap rpm for the mentioned 16 port board. I turned on in Services dgap. However, when I reboot the system the ttys disappear. Could it be that the udev rpm is not installed? When I run the mpi install and load program, everything works. But a reboot deletes it all! Help!

Hi there Looking at the archives I didn't find a solution to the following problem we have here: Printing from our linux-server (wagner) to an intel printserver (PS652D8F) doesn't work. Here's the stuff we know/tried: wagner:~ # smbclient -L //PS652D8F -N added interface ip=10.0.0.10 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.40 ( 10.0.0.40

Hello, We need to migrate our AD from NT PDC Schema Version 88 to Samba PDC, but we can't join our Samba to NT PDC or migrate SID History and Account Passwords to Samba PDC. Our company is over 3000 NT Servers and over 5000 Users and we need to migrate to Samba without Servers rejoin and Passwords reset, but it's very important for as to migrate. Is it possible that there will be

I'm trying to use the documentation found with Samba-2.2.4 to set up a samba server under RH linux 7.2 (kernel 2.4.9-21) to join an existing NT domain for a couple of weeks with no success. I obtained the samba 2.2.4 source code, compiled with the following options to configure: --with-winbind --prefix=/usr/local/samba --with-smbwrapper --with-pam --with -pam_smbpass After compiling, I

Oops, sorry for the message title, making it more descriptive now... 2013/2/3 Dmitry Mikushin <dmitry at kernelgen.org> > Dear all, > > Yesterday, from the customer's code I observed relatively simple case, > where Polly is unable to detect parallelizable outer loop. Consider two > versions of Fortran routine: > > 1) > > subroutine filter(H, szh, X, szx, Y,

On 14/11/2019 20:45, Matthias Leopold via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I posted a similar question in 2018 with no answers, so I'll try again: > Is it possible to have shares with Windows ACLs and shares with POSIX > ACLs on the same server (security = user)? Since share permissions are > handled differently for both types of shares I'm not sure if this will > work. I

On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 21:45 +0100, Matthias Leopold via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I posted a similar question in 2018 with no answers, so I'll try > again: > Is it possible to have shares with Windows ACLs and shares with > POSIX > ACLs on the same server (security = user)? Since share permissions > are > handled differently for both types of shares I'm not sure

Am 14.11.19 um 23:03 schrieb Jeremy Allison via samba: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:51:41AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 21:45 +0100, Matthias Leopold via samba wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I posted a similar question in 2018 with no answers, so I'll try >>> again: >>> Is it possible to have shares with Windows

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:10:52AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > However, a few filesystems still rely on the ->list() method of the > generix POSIX ACL xattr handlers in their ->listxattr() inode operation. > This is a very limited set of filesystems. For most of them there is no > dependence on the generic POSIX ACL xattr handler in any way. > > In addition, during

Am 14.11.19 um 22:12 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 14/11/2019 20:45, Matthias Leopold via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I posted a similar question in 2018 with no answers, so I'll try again: >> Is it possible to have shares with Windows ACLs and shares with POSIX >> ACLs on the same server (security = user)? Since share permissions are >> handled