Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "hdX vs sdX on centos 5.x with ata_piix"
2002 Aug 20
2
feedback/help request
Hi,
First, let me thank you for the excellent documentation and
programming work on Syslinux. It has made getting to this point
infinitely easier.
Unfortunately, I need to request some guidance in
troubleshooting a problem I am having using the RedHat installer on
their version 7.3, which uses Syslinux as the boot mechanism. A little
background: I have an old Micron Powerdigm XsU dual PII
2010 Mar 31
1
[PATCH] Default to IDE when VirtIO isn't available
Previously we used SCSI when VirtIO wasn't available. KVM's SCSI support is not
as mature as its IDE support, and SCSI isn't supported at all in RHEV.
---
lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Converter.pm | 50 +++++++++++-------
lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Converter/Linux.pm | 19 ++++---
lib/Sys/VirtV2V/GuestOS/RedHat.pm | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 69
2006 Mar 21
2
HP DL140G2 and SATA woes
Posted a similar version of this to the RHEL4 list...
I''m having trouble getting CentOS 4.2 installed on a DL140G2 with two SATA
drives. I am doing a PXE install, so I do not have a CD-ROM drive in the
system and this appears to have the side-effect that both SATA drives are
caught by the Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver before ata_piix can catch
it.
As soon as I hook an IDE CD-ROM
2007 Jun 13
4
network raid file system/server
hi,
we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to create
one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to create
it in a redundant way ie:
- if one (or more) of the hdd or server fails the whole filesystem still
usable and consistent.
- any server in this farm can see the same storage/filesystem.
it's someting a big network raid5-6... storage where
2007 Sep 03
1
kvm guests are not able to restart
hi,
i've got a centos-5 x86_64 kvm-35 host system with one centos-5 i386 and
one x86_64 guests. but none of the guest are able to restart. ie. i
login to the guests and restart it. it start's as normal reboot, but
after the last command (shuting down md device) it's do nothing, but in
virt-manager i see 50% load on the guest. the biggest problem currently
i can't find any way to
2005 Nov 04
1
samba in centosplus
hi,
it'd be useful to include the latest stable samba packages in the
centosplus, since samba.org do not build binaries for rhel just for old
redhat and fedora releases.
yours.
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
2008 Jun 25
2
[Fwd: Re: [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.2 i386 and x86_64]
may here someone can answer me...
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.2 i386 and x86_64
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:31:20 +0200
From: Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org>
To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel at centos.org>
References: <4860E6EB.5000906 at centos.org>
Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> We are
2013 Aug 08
3
forcing linux kernel 3 to recognize cdrom as hdX
Hello,
I have a problem with older version of anaconda linux installer. I have
upgraded kernel in my distro, but, when this anaconda boot with new 3.4.52
kernel, can NOT find cdrom. As far as I understand, this is because the new
kernel recognize cd drive as srX, scdX instead of older hdX with 2.6.18. At
the moment I can not upgrade anaconda and forced this kernel to recognize
it as before.
Are
2007 Aug 02
1
kmod-xfs disappear!
hi,
it seems since yesterday the kmod-xfs rpms for the default (non
centosplus kernel) are removed from centos/5/centosplus repositories.
what happens? why did you do so? is there any announcement about it?
thanks.
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
2005 Jul 07
2
raid5 crash
hi,
after we switch our servers from centos-3 to centos-4 (aka. rhel-4) one
of our server always crash once a week without any oops. this happneds
with both the normal kernel-2.6.9-11.EL and
kernel-2.6.9-11.106.unsupported. after we change the motherboard, the
raid contorller and the cables too we still got it. finally we start
netdump and last but not least yesterday we got a crash log and a
2009 Apr 27
0
ata_piix
Hi all
I am using cents 5.3 on a gigabyte motherboard MA78GM-US2H.
When installing centos using kickstart I get prompted to load a driver.
I select the ata_piix driver
and everything continues as normal.
Is there a way in kickstart or the boot command prompt line to specify
loading the ata_piix module automatically?
Why isnt the kernel loading it automatically? I dont recall having to
ever do
2003 Apr 16
1
errors
hi,
in the yesterday cvs, an internal error in the imap message appear in
the client side and in the maillog:
-------------------------
Apr 16 10:01:42 red imap(zgabor): Corrupted index file
/home/zgabor/Maildir/.Lists.Bugtraq/.imap.index: Invalid seen messages
count (284 < 285)
Apr 16 10:01:43 red imap(zgabor): Corrupted index file
/home/zgabor/Maildir/.Lists.Linux/.imap.index: Invalid
2009 Feb 05
1
current state of kvm for centos-5
hi,
after a long time it seems the current packages which needed for kvm on
centos-5 host seems to working (ie. worth to change). my repo:
http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/SRPMS/
contains the current set of rpms what we use (about a week):
-----------------------------
libvirt-0.6.0-1
python-virtinst-0.400.1-1
virt-manager-0.6.1-1
virt-top-1.0.1-7.el5
virt-viewer-0.0.3-3
2011 Jan 28
2
liebertgxt2 patch for 2.6.0
hi,
it seems our latest liebertgxt2 patch still missing from the just
released 2.6.0. i'm attached the patch to the 2.6.0. this patch:
- add the possibility to properly shutdown the ups,
- can be used through usb-serial adapter cable too.
could you apply it to the source.
regards.
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
-------------- next part
2003 May 28
1
new problems
hi,
so yesterday I move the whole mail system to a better machine. the only
thing which is running on this system is dovect and:
--------------------------------------------------
10:44am up 6 days, 25 min, 3 users, load average: 28.03, 17.96, 9.05
233 processes: 231 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU0 states: 3.1% user, 29.4% system, 0.0% nice, 66.4% idle
CPU1 states: 7.1%
2014 Mar 05
2
maraidb for el6
hi,
i put together a mariadb rpm for el6. it seem to be much more
complicated then i thought.
the sources was:
- Karanbir's mariadb for centos6 5.5.29
http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/mariadb/
unfortunately the link disappear a few days ago but i've got the src.rpm
- rhel7 mariadb-5.5.33a-3.el7.src.rpm
- fedora's mariadb-5.5.35-4.fc21.src.rpm
- rhel6's scl's
2010 Feb 19
2
[PATCH 1/2] Fix remapping of block devices
We were assuming that guests wouldn't use multiple interfaces, or if they did,
drive letters wouldn't clash between the interfaces. An ESX guest with a CDROM
device breaks this because hard disks will be presented a SCSI, starting at sda,
and CDROM devices are presented as IDE, starting at hda. This is in contrast to
QEMU, which starts at hdc by default.
Firstly, this change causes disks
2017 Jan 19
2
[PATCH 1/2] canonical_device_name: Don't rewrite /dev/mdX as /dev/sdX (RHBZ#1414682).
The guestfs_canonical_device_name API was rewriting /dev/mdX as
/dev/sdX. This is wrong since (eg) /dev/sd0 is not a device name, so
if you pass the canonicalized name back to the API it will fail.
virt-v2v was one tool doing this.
---
src/canonical-name.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/canonical-name.c b/src/canonical-name.c
index ae7b468..d72768f 100644
---
2019 Feb 28
0
What files to edit when changing the sdX of hard drives?
Le 28/02/2019 ? 04:12, Jobst Schmalenbach a ?crit?:
> I want to lock in the SDA/SDB/SDC for my drives
In short : use UUIDs or labels instead of hardcoding /dev/sdX.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/persistent_block_device_naming
Cheers,
Niki
--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat
Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
Blog :
2019 Feb 28
0
What files to edit when changing the sdX of hard drives?
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:52 AM mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> > Le 28/02/2019 ? 04:12, Jobst Schmalenbach a ?crit :
> >
> >> I want to lock in the SDA/SDB/SDC for my drives
> >
> > In short : use UUIDs or labels instead of hardcoding /dev/sdX.
> >
> >