similar to: ACL permissions with XP problem

Hi: I want to upgrade a Fedora Core 1 Linux machine that is running Samba 3.0.2a to 3.0.5. Initially, I compiled the 3.0.2a source, with defaults, and installed. The installation resides in /usr/local/samba. Can I download the 3.0.5 source, compile and install without breaking anything? Will the configuration be broken? Does anyone know a way to do this cleanly? Anyone's help is

Hi there, Sorry to possibly rehash stuff that's already been answered, I'm new to the list. I've recently installed 3.0alpha23-0 because of it's superior group mapping (over 2.2). I'm running a PDC on Debian Woody. I'm also using the tdb backend as ldap is too big a bite to chew for me for now. Things are working well for basic shares, but I want to get into setting

Wondering if anyone can help. Here is my situation, I have a RH 7.3 machine running a compiled from source rpm version of samba 2.2.7. We have been a win98se (which works great) shop for sometime but are migrating to XP Pro machines slowly. I can get the XP machine to join the domain (and the machine account is created in both the /etc/passwd and /etc/samba/smbpasswd file) but when I reboot and

I've posted this before but had to leave town and wasn't able to follow up... I'm still having this problem. Here is what is in the logs when I try and log in. [2004/07/14 07:58:02, 0] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(863) authorise_login: rejected invalid user nobody Original Message: Wondering if anyone can help. Here is my situation, I have a RH 7.3 machine running a compiled

Hello recently I set up XFS share under samba , and played from Win2K with ACL entries of shared files, and noticed that Win2K never DENY ACL entries , so for example for a XFS file with acl: # owner: a user::r-- group::rwx other::rwx Win2K security tab shows for user "a": Read & exec = <nothing here> Read = Allowed Write = <nothing

Dear list readers - it was brought to my attention that during the upgrade of a server to rh7.2, and selecting the ext3 migration works well with 1 exception that i need verified if i could please. i heard that once you migrate to ext3, you may no longer do a kernel upgrade without downgrading to ext2 and then putting the kernel or AC kernel in place 'patched'. What i need to know

Hi, I run a small system with an older version of shorewall (1.4.2). It has been extremely solid for a long time. But recently I have noticed the connection table filling up, which has never happened before. My guess is that the box is getting hit with floods. The system only has 64M of ram and the conntrack_max is set to 4096 based on the ram. I have temporarily increased it to 8192 so that it

Hello to all of you, After installing Samba i have the following Problem: I would like to use acl's, ldap and quotas with samba so i run configure with the options --with-acl-support --with-ldapsam --with-ldap --with-quota After running configure i found the following lines with acl: checking sys/acl.h usability... no checking sys/acl.h presence... no checking for sys/acl.h... no checking

Anybody have any thoughts on the Linux+ certification?

Hi guys/girls, How are you keeping ? A while ago I mentioned a problem that I'm picking up with Samba with OpenLDAP and the "logon hours" restrictions which are implemented via the NT 4.0 User Manager. Basically my problem was that users were unable to login 2 hours before the actual restriction should kick in. At the time I thought that perhaps the problem was caused by

I'm running into trouble while setting up samba4 on centos 6.4 see #yum install -y libacl-devel libblkid-devel gnutls-devel readline-devel python-devel gdb pkgconfig krb5-workstation zlib-devel setroubleshoot-server setroubleshoot-plugins policycoreutils-python libsemanage-python setools-libs-python setools-libs popt-devel libpcap-devel sqlite-devel libidn-devel libxml2-devel libacl-devel

Ok, very frustrated after spending most of the day onthe * irc channel with little to no help. Mostly just a bunch of crap about being a newbie, going and reading voip-info.org. etc. Despite me doing all that already. My situation is not good but here it is. Hurricane came through, power spikes killed PBX. Just trying to replace it affordable and possibly with a few more features. I am using *

Hello I have samba (2.2.7a) shares on linux (rh 7 & 9) servers with posix-acl (both kernel (2.4.19/ext2 and 2.4.20/xfs) and samba enabled) and an nt 4 PDC. works fine except that I can't change acl of a file/dir if i'm not the owner, thought i'm in a group that has write access to the file/dir I set the "dos filemode = yes" as told in "man smb.conf", but it

finishing a week of teaching a comptia linux+ class off of centos 7.4 and wanted to demo how to boot to "rescue" mode, so i rebooted, selected "rescue" mode at grub menu, which still booted to full multiuser, graphical mode. what am i doing wrong? or is this a dumb question? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day

On 28.09.2014 22:22, flavio wrote: > I follow your tutorial untill this instruction: > > wget "http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libusb/libusb-1.0/libusb- > 1.0.18/libusb-1.0.18.tar.bz2? > r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.libusb.org%2F&ts=1404210716&use_mirror=softlayer-ams" > -O libusb-1.0.18.tar.bz2 > > in my opiniono there are 2 " that are not needed and

1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8? Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks Inc CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+ Linux+, Network+, Server+ . www.impalanetworks.com P: (505) 327-7300 F: (505) 327-7545

Hi all, linux:/var/log/samba # cat /etc/fstab | grep acl /dev/sda2 /shared ext3 defaults,acl 0 0 >From XP I connect to my server and try to set permission for my user's home directory, but when I click apply the checked checkboxs set back unchecked. :( linux:/var/log/samba # cat log.smbd [2004/03/29 16:06:31, 1]

Hi, I have download the latest version samba-3.0.13-1.src.rpm, and I have make followings changes: Rpm -i samba-3.0.13-1.src.rpm, so I have created the SPEC file. I have added --with-acl-support in the CFLAGS section in the SPEC file. Rpmbuild -bb specfile.spec. It compile the finally rpm without errors but when I install the package and make ldd /usr/sbin/smbd, I can't see libattr and libacl

Hi, Apologies if I'm missing anything or this has already been discussed. I did try looking at the bug list and mailing list archives before sending this. Plus it's my first time posting. I am trying to compile rsync (v3.1.0) on a Synology NAS with ACL support. Why am I doing this? I have files that have extended ACLs that need to be preserved when another filesystem is rsync'd

When doing ./configure --with-acl-support it gives me a message almost at the end of "checking whether to support ACLs... no". What am I missing??