similar to: Samba locking problem - is this a bug ?

When trying to make the last version I'm getting this error (#./configure --prefix=/some/dir); #make): ============================ gcc -g -O2 -I/usr/local/openssl/include -DPKGLIBDIR=/usr/local/tinc_new/lib /tinc -DCONFDIR=\"/usr/local/tinc_new/etc\" -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local /tinc_new/share/locale\" -DLOCALSTATEDIR=\"/usr/local/tinc_new/var\" -o tincd

Hi, I'm using tinc for ~ 2 years now and I'm very happy with it (thanks to the makers - this is very good program to use). Anyway everytime I build I have this odd problem and until now I always found a way to solve it but now I'm really stuck. I'm trying to build tinc-pre7 and I always reach to this error on configure: --------------------- checking for RAND_pseudo_bytes... no

Hi, I'm trying to setup a Linux CD on mashine that will have nothing but a CDROM. Everything worked fine until I removed the HDD. From this moment on the CD doesn;t boot. I upgraded to Syslinux 2.0 but with no luck. The error message I got almost says it all: "Extremely broken BIOS", but can I ask for help if there some ideas how to fix this, cause if I put the HDD back the CD boots

Hello, I successfully use tinc for one year in a configuration with several subnets (about 5-7 subnets) and one main server. Sometimes tinc dies with the error message: Error while waiting for input: Bad file descriptor If it happens, this happens immediately, when one subnet has disconnected. tinc (on the main server) tries then to disconnect all currently connected subnets and while

Hi, I updated from Samba 2.2.5 to 2.2.8a. und Redhat 6.2 and since then, smbstatus shows strange values The dates and the pid's are wrong. Any ideas? Was there a change in a locking.tdb? Do I have to remove it? Greetings Hansj?rg 28643 DENY_NONE 0x3f407996 RDONLY LEVEL_II ?7??W? Tue Jan 6 22:38:12 1970 1633824626 0x706d622e NONE ?7??W? Thu Jan 1 02:00:00 1970 1836017711 0x56414143

Hi, this is not a problem, but more explaination. I have four networks connected via tinc - A, B, C and D. B, C and D connect to A. What is odd to me is that B and C communicate directly (without going to A); while all communication to D network goes via A. When I turned more verbose logging on tinc, I show a line like this: "adding route to VPN_NAME vi MASTER_VPN_NAME". Why does it

Hi all, I have the following question. If the master tinc dies (the one that clients have ConnectTo option), does clients conntinue to communicate with each other ? I noteced the following. If there is some traffic between the clients and the master tinc dies - there is no problem. But if there is no traffic between clients and the master dies, then when I try to access some different than master

I installed Tinc and started on two mashines. both connect and say everything is OK. But then when I try to ping through the VPN I get the following errors in syslog: on server: rtr-us tinc.vpn_net[911]: Metadata socket read error for BG_VPN (x.x.x.x - inet ip of client): No such process and on client ns tinc.vpn_net[301]: Incoming data socket error: Connection refused what does it mean as on my

It didn't help :( When I did ping to 192.168.1.1 from client machine I got the following in syslog: May 8 08:55:54 ns tinc.vpn_net[726]: Sending packet of 100 bytes to US_VPN (x.x.x.x - inetIP) May 8 08:55:55 ns tinc.vpn_net[726]: Incoming data socket error: Connection refused tcpdump -i tap0 gives this: 08:49:13.919331 ns.iris.bg > 192.168.1.1: icmp: echo request 08:49:14.919323

Hi, for some time now I'm trying to create the best environment/solve a sharing conflict around a DOS application (Clippered dBase I suscpect) that one of our clients is using and distributing over about 20 Sun 450's on a shared service 'servershare'. On every Sun there are multiple Windows 95 clients connected to diverse shares amongst which this 'servershare'. On this

just minutes ago I upgraded one of my PC to kernel 2.4.14 and after that starting Tincd gives me the following error: " tinc.vpn1[2611]: Error while reading from ethertap device: File descriptor in bad state" Once I had this error and you advised me to recompile tinc, so I did it now, but now it hasn't helped. So any help from you would be appreciated Kosta Galabov Sysadmin Tinc:

Hi, I'm using tinc 1.pre3 with kernel 2.4.3 and it was working fine. I upgraded my kernel to 2.4.10 and tinc stopped working with the following error in syslog: ======= tinc.vpn1[236]: Error while reading from ethertap device: File descriptor in bad state ========= Does anyone had this problem and can you help me with it ? - Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive:

Hi, We are running Samba 2.2.5 on RedHat 7.3 rebuild with ldap support. We run Win2k Terminal Server, which provides most of the clients for the samba server. After a fairly long samba server up time (usually a couple of days, but this happened overnight), we end up with some odd entries in the smbstatus output in the "Locked files:" area.... Here is one line of the type I mean:

I have the same problem as described below for a while. samba 3.0.23c-2 under Fedora 6 clients Win XP and Fedora 6 app. OpenOffice 2.1 / 2.0.4 will there be any progress ? thanx -- Kristian Lauritsen Laser Product Manager PicoQuant GmbH phone: +49 30 6392 6563 http://www.picoquant.com On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:41:04AM +0000, Phill Gillespie wrote: > Hi... > > I've been

Hi, I have one NAS which I can access via NFS or Samba. This storage is accessed by 2 linux servers with Samba where I re-export the NAS share. This is sort of an active/active loadbalancing cluster. The only thing not working is locking... If a client opens a Word-File via server1 and another opens the same via server2 it won't inform the user that he can only open the file readonly. I was

Hi... I've been running samba 3.0 for quite some time now (Debian's stable version, currently 3.0.14) and I've had no problems. That's probably been because all my clients were Windows XP boxes. I've now moved several users to Linux (Ubuntu Breezy) as their desktop and I've noticed there seems to be a problem in accessing files across the platforms. If a Linux box

I'm running a samba pdc on my gentoo box in a mixed environment with a couple of Windows XP clients and only a few MacOSX clients. The users told me, the file locking across the platforms does not work properly sometimes. I tried to google my problem, but without luck. I switched all the flags related the lock mechanism of samba on and off, but the problem seems to be solved yet. The only

Hello, I am trying to work out the file locking mechanism on our Samba server when connecting from Linux clients. I am getting some strange behaviour in a mixed Linux/Windows environment when multiple clients open/lock the same file for writing. Everything seems fine when a Windows client creates the lock, but if a Linux client creates the lock, we get either two or more Linux clients being able

Hello all! I discover a strange thing. We use and develop DOS financial accounting application, written on Xbase (formerly known as Clipper). This application agressively uses of file sharing and locking (byte-range and all possible for DOS combinations), creates and uses huge amount of index (NTX) and Dbase III (DBF) files on network shared resource. Network clients are Windows 98se,

Alex, On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:30:01PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: > I applied the patch to a new build of Sernet 4.4.6 SRPM. I could still > open the file from both hosts, and in fact this time I could actually > open it on the same host without any problems: I don't see where you're opening the file twice from one smbclient below. Am I missing something? And then there's no