similar to: Found MS-Word 97 & Samba bug : diagnostic found!

Hi all, I searched thru excellent http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&r=1&w=2 (samba ML archive...) answer to my questions. I asked Google too. Both doesnt know about my problem. That's why I finaly decided to polute samba ML :-( Here's the environment: a Linux Box under Debian Woody (stable, nothing compiled by hand EXCEPT KERNEL (aacraid issue..)): master:~# uname -a

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Paul ARGUDO [mailto:jean.paul.argudo@pack-solutions.com] > Many times a day, clients here when oppening a MS Word 97 > document have > it in "READ ONLY" mode, but seems no reason fort that!! Make very, very sure that you have no network problems. I had a very similar problem with AutoCAD that turned out to be a user who was on

Hello I use a new samba server with LDAP support as PDC for some Windows2000 and WindowsXP machines. All is working nice. The useer can login with a user/password in the domain, we have remote profiles, the user can access the samba shares and print etc. But after some time (< 1 day) we get a smbstatus output like the attached file. Users are connected multiple times with the same share

On Samba 4.3.11 Server (Ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04) : find this issues on negoziation on windows 10 clients: 26283 nobody nogroup 192.168.2.170 (ipv4:192.168.2.170:50114) Unknown (0x0311) 26283 nobody nogroup 192.168.2.170 (ipv4:192.168.2.170:50114) Unknown (0x0311) 26283 nobody nogroup 192.168.2.170 (ipv4:192.168.2.170:50114) Unknown (0x0311) 26283

Hi Folks, Small office setup, 3 computers, 3 staff. Recently updated system and rebooted. Today, I am seeing crazy amounts of the same listing for clients (294 lines!) and open files... (snipped content below, you really don't want PAGES of it!) $ smbstatus Samba version 4.3.11-Ubuntu PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version

I am thankful for all support received so far and I feel I'm getting closer to a solution. To get back to basics and a more transparent setup I have made a clean Ubuntu 16.04 installation and followed this guide https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Standalone_Server Windows clients users are logged in with username Admin (local account, administrator). The samba share is

Hello, I have a samba-4.9.1 serving a tmp space that I would like to write to without authentication. The smb.conf is: [global] workgroup = DIRECTORY interfaces = 10.10.10.1 bind interfaces only = Yes security = user map to guest = Bad User rndc command = /bin/true server role = STANDALONE netbios name = filer log level = 3

I asked about this a few days ago, but none of the suggestions have made any difference... asking again in the hopes I'll find more things to try.... Linux: Ubuntu 9.10 Samba version: 3.4.0 OS X 10.6.2 I'm running samba on a local linux server, with a bunch of shares. Over the last several years, this has worked perfectly in our heterogenous network of OS X and Windows. All my windows

I'm running samba on a local linux server, with a bunch of shares. Over the last several years, this has worked perfectly in our heterogenous network of OS X and Windows. All my windows clients still work perfectly - my users can mount the samba shares and create, rename, move etc files and folders. However, recently (starting yesterday) my OS X clients are unable to rename any sub

Begin forwarded message: > From: Kimball Larsen <kimball at miridiatech.com> > Date: February 2, 2010 7:58:49 PM MST > To: Andy Liebman <andyliebman at aol.com> > Subject: Re: [Samba] OS X Clients Can't Create Sub-Directories > > > On Feb 2, 2010, at 6:53 PM, Andy Liebman wrote: > >> >> Kimball Larsen wrote: >>> I'm running

Hello Everybody, I was searching for an answer myself for quite some time without success, so I hope somebody can clarify...I use rsync to sync webcontent from one server to another. Apache-details: * Apache runs as nobody:nogroup. * Source-Server-Rights htdocs: The rsync-user gains access via o+rx * Destination-Server-Rights htdocs: The rsync-user is in the group 'nogroup', gains

Hi Are there any known problems with Word 97 and Samba. I have couple of users that complain about Word loosing contact with the server. Sometimes with error msg. sometimes not. Sometimes behaves like its trying to store something but can't do it. The user is running Word 97-sr2. Find nothing wrong with words settings. I have disablet oplocks, did'nt help. Any other options that might

Hi all. I thying settings the option "hide unreadable" but not work. I tested in global section and share section, follow my settings now. after various tests. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = BATLAB realm = BATLAB.CORP netbios name = GAUSS server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl,

I've translated a Windows based DFS tree to a Samba based (3.0.23c) one and it seems to work quite well from Windows Explorer and cmd.exe. First off, I have a relatively big tree. grep dfscmd /root/dfs.cmd | wc -l 1614 One issue I've noticed that tree enumeration and manipulation from a Windows machine to a Samba based DFS root just doesn't work at all. For instance dfscmd.exe

Hi, Over the weekend I decided to create an icecast relay for Nicecast. I wanted this to run in a chroot jail on a redhat server. There did not seem to be much on the web about setting this up; I'm including some details here. This is my first encounter with icecast; I'm hoping to elicit comments and criticism (e.g., if my post is too long). First, there did not seem to be a startup

Using samba 4.0.9 as an AD DC (no other domain servers). Since my UIDs and GIDs have changed, I was doing cleanup: find /srv/svn/ -xdev '(' -nouser -o -nogroup ')' -ls I noticed this was very slow -- iostat reported only about 2tps and 50kB/s to my disks. So I timed it with nsswitch.conf users & groups set to "files" vs. "files winbind": # with

smbstatus reports the following...that my NT users on this one samba server are connected as the guest user "nobody". All Win95 users are connected under their proper name. Anything I need to change? Samba version 1.9.16p11 Service uid gid pid machine ---------------------------------------------- gdl nobody nogroup 1555 gdl-dt (137.202.211.8) Wed

Hia, I have a problem using the %G parameter. At the end if my smb.conf file I have something like: include = \etc\smb.conf.%G At this way I hoped that according the the group, I can load a configuration file accoring the the users group. Instead that a 'smb.conf.it' group is loaded, a samba tries to load 'smb.conf.nogroup' (guest account is uid=nobody gid=nogroup) WHat I

On 5/27/17, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat, 27 May 2017 04:31:07 +0900 > john smith via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> > getent passwd nobody >> > nobody:x:65534:65534:nobody:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >> >> Ok, I know that. Please read my 1st post more carefully. I added my >> nobody

Can you try enabling mail_debug=yes, perform a pop3 session and provide logs? Aki On 25.07.2018 15:53, Jakub L?nsk? wrote: > Here is it > > # 2.3.2.1 (0719df592): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > # Pigeonhole version 0.5.2 (5d6d7c92) > # OS: Linux 4.4.0-112-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS > # Hostname: mda22 > auth_cache_negative_ttl = 2 secs > auth_cache_size = 16 M >