similar to: ext3 buffer leak/memory leak?

Hi, It's become almost routine now to reboot the server every morning. If we are able to log in, after a lag of ~10 seconds, we see the load average is usually > 3.0. As I am writing this, it just went down again. The console had a bunch of text on it, the very bottom reading: <o> Kernel panic : Aiee, Killing Interrupt handler! In interrupt handler - not syncing Here is the

Since I ain't got a better place to report this, I do it here: Kernel 2.4.20-ac1 # uptime 16:31:00 up 2 days, 22:10, 7 users, load average: 1.89, 2.20, 2.99 This is our main mailbox server. We're running ext3: # cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / ext3 rw 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 /dev/sdb5 /boot ext3 rw 0 0 /dev/sda6 /home ext3 rw,noatime,nosuid 0 0 /dev/sdb8 /tmp

Good evening all, I''ve all but finished installing Xen 2.0.5, XenLinux 2.6.10 and Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r4 into /boot on a colo box currently (and temporarily) running CentOS. I''ve chrooted into the debian install (chroot /boot /bin/bash) and was able to set everything up, install requisite packages, install xen, etc. Now I''m at the last step and I''ve run into

I am getting an odd situation when backing up a number of ext3 filesystems and was wondering if it could be caused by journalling. Over the space of a minute the load average will jump from 2 to over 40 and the system will be unresponsive for anywhere from 8 to 25 minutes. I am going to be trying a number of things, but was wondering if anyone could see the reason for the high load given the

(Sent to linux-raid, linux-kernel and ext3-users since I'm not sure what type of issue this is) I've got a test system here running Redhat 7.1 + stock 2.4.9 with these patches: http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/2.4.9/linux-2.4.9-NFS_ALL.dif http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/ext3-2.4-0.9.6-249.gz http://domsch.com/linux/aacraid/linux-2.4.9-aacraid-20010816.patch All three patches applied

Hello, I am trying to make my UPS system working with NUT but with no success. I got "No supported UPS detected" message. I use the blazer_usb driver since it was proposed to me by the web site. My NUT version is : 2.7.1 (installed from standard RPM), release 2.41 The UPS identification: INFOSEC X4 RM PLUS linux-2qya:~ # /usr/lib/ups/driver/blazer_usb -a infosec Network UPS Tools -

I am noticing considerably longer first page load times on most of my rails apps running Rails (1.1.2) off Mongrel (0.13) on linux. After the initial request everything seems to run OK. Has anybody else noticed this and is there anyway to compensate. Also following the instructions for working with unicode from the rails wiki, the number of pages served drops noticeably. Are there any sites

Op 29-01-15 om 21:21 schreef Gordon Messmer: > > I haven't seen delays anywhere near that long before, even with heavy swapping. But I guess I'd look at that sort of thing first. > > Run "iostat -x 2" and see if your disks are being fully utilized during the pauses. Run "top" and see if there's anything useful there. Check swap use with

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2334 Summary: zpool destroy panics after zfs_force_umount_stress Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo:

Hi, My swap is on raidz1. Df -k and swap -l are showing almost no usage of swap, while zfs list and zpool list are showing me 96% capacity. Which should i believe? Justin # df -hk Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on /dev/dsk/c3t0d0s1 14G 4.0G 10G 28% / /devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices ctfs

Hello I have a fresh Solaris 10/6 install. My disk have 20Gb but I used only 10GB for the base solaris installation and home directory. I have 10GB free without any partition. I would like to use my free space to store my zones using zfs filesystem. In example: /zones /zone/zona1 /zone/zone2 How I can create "/zones" filesystem ? zpool create zones ????? ?????: What I must

Hi there, I have a client in a network using a samba-server that has to use MSDOS, because some software running on it needs a clean DOS. I installed the DOS-Client for TCPIP that is available from Microsoft V 1.0 and it works fine; the only thing is, that it takes so much memory below 640 K, that another program also running under DOS does not function correctly anymore. Maybe some of the

We have an occasional problem which manifests with multiple processes being created for a particular user. For example, for a user "xy004": xy004 8463 0.0 0.0 6.02M 0K ?? IW 11:48:59 0:02.02 smbd xy004 9426 0.0 0.0 5.99M 0K ?? IW 11:52:18 0:03.68 smbd xy004 10433 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:17:20 0:00.85 smbd xy004

hi... i try to make dovecot (v1.0.r26) in solaris 10 and i have the following problem # ./configure --with-ldap ... ... Install prefix ...................... : /usr/local File offsets ........................ : 64bit I/O loop method ..................... : poll File change notification method ..... : none Building with SSL support ........... : yes (OpenSSL) Building with IPv6 support ..........

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote: > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/37. Out of curiousity, I ran some quick tests on a AMD Athlon(TM) MP 2100+ box running Redhat linux 7.1. With the LLVM C

Hi: i have a hosted server with asterisk and a2billing as a billing plattform, when i am trying to enter the server remotely by ssh, memory error message displayed: -bash: fork: Cannot allocate memory i have 1GB RAM on the system ,and there is 15 to 25 concurrent calls on the system is'nt 1GB of RAM sufficient for this volume of calls on Asterisk. and when iam using "top"

I'm not sure what gave me this idea, but I decided to comment out the swap partition in /etc/fstab and reboot my laptop. I did not run swapoff directly at any time. I'm running more things now than I would ever dream of to hammer my 500MB of memory, but I still notice NO slowdown. This is the best desktop experience I've ever had for any OS on any hardware! Here's the first 12

I seem to notice these two processes running with top. Netstat hasn't been issued by me and cant be killed with the START state. Can someone enlighten me on these processes. FreeBSD dracula.transylvania.net 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #4: Sun Dec 4 00:22:01 EST 2005 root@dracula.transylvania.net:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/BLEACH i386 The box doesnt run ssh or telnet just postfix

George, I have the detailed log below. (Resending after trimming the email to 40KB.) The sequence below just repeats ad-nauseam. Is this a SIP trunk issue? Thanks! --------------------- Transmitting SIP request (885 bytes) to UDP:65.254.44.194:5060 ---> INVITE sip:12025551212 at 65.254.44.194:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 18.18.19.123:5060

On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > i took a look into LLVM benchmarks from nightly tester and > ran Shootout tests on my own. Below go just few outlines. > > 1. results on my AMD AthlonXP and Xeon used by LLVM > team are different sometime. In particular, both Shootout > and Shootout-C++ show great speed up with LLVM (in >