Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "AW: Samba server in a failover environment"
2003 Feb 12
2
Samba server in a failover environment
Hello, Samba Gurus .....
I have a Samba server running on a pair of SUN servers (server-a and
server-b).
The samba shares are NFS mounted from a third SUN server (server-c).
I installed Samba 2.2.7a on the paired SUN servers under /usr/local/samba
(Samba 2.2.7a is locally installed on server-a and server-b, since
/usr/local/samba
is local on the rootdisk.)
The failover environment works like
2005 Jul 01
10
Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4
Hello.
Anyone else experiencing Problems with this update ?
We do have W2k AD. And Samba Member-Server. This is done via Winbind
without using Kerberos.
After installing the Update to our AD-Servers. It seems that winbind lost
its connectivity.
wbinfo -t worked.
wbinfo -u showed errors.
After removing the update from all our servers, winbind works again.
Should I move our configuration to
2016 Apr 15
3
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
> On 15/04/16 10:33, Oktay Akbal wrote:
> > [global]
> > workgroup = DOMAIN
> > realm = DOMAIN.DE
> > netbios name = HOST
> > server string = HOST
> > security = ADS
> > encrypt passwords = Yes
> > map to guest = Bad User
> > password server = *
> > log
2005 Jul 16
2
after upgrade from 3.0.7 -> 3.0.14 extrem slow access from window s 2000
Hello list,
a samba server serves the home directories for about 100 Windows 2000
clients.
We had samba 3.0.7 (on debian woody) installed, and upgraded to 3.0.14a (we
used the sernet packages on debian sarge).
Now access to files from windows 2000 clients is extremely slow, especially
on .exe files. Simply selecting a exe file from windows explorer may freeze
it for 2-10 seconds. Other file
2016 Apr 15
0
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
On 15/04/16 11:11, Oktay Akbal wrote:
>> On 15/04/16 10:33, Oktay Akbal wrote:
>>> [global]
>>> workgroup = DOMAIN
>>> realm = DOMAIN.DE
>>> netbios name = HOST
>>> server string = HOST
>>> security = ADS
>>> encrypt passwords = Yes
>>> map to guest =
2016 Apr 15
3
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
Hello everyone,
any ideas on why a newly installed domain member (w2k8 domain) might seem to work fine in every test (wbinfo -g, wbinfo -t, getent group, wbinfo -n username, getent passwd user, share-access.., ) but only enumeration of users with wbinfo -u and getent passwd fail?
wbinfo -u just returns without any output and getent passwd just shows the default centos7 users.
Even with
2016 Apr 18
0
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not (update2)
On 18/04/16 08:06, Oktay Akbal wrote:
>
>>> Rowland
>>>
>> OK, it is now later :-)
>>
>> My DCs are now running a self-compiled Samba 4.4.2, I set up a domain
>> member in a VM running 4.4.2, again self compiled. My laptop runs Wheezy
>> and Samba Version 4.2.11-SerNet-Debian-9.wheezy.
>>
>> Every thing works, wbinfo -u, wbinfo -g,
2016 Apr 18
0
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not (update2)
Ok, I have resolved my problem with this error by recreating my Kerberos keytab file :
net ads keytab create -k
Hope this could help some others people.
Regards
Philippe RITTER
-----Message d'origine-----
De : RITTER, Philippe
Envoyé : lundi 18 avril 2016 11:38
À : 'Rowland penny'; 'sambalist'
Objet : RE: [Samba] Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not (update2)
Hello
2016 Apr 16
7
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not (update2)
On 16/04/16 21:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> New update.
>
>
>
> I now have done about 6 machines.
>
> 2 with samba 4.2.10 work fine, 2 not.
>
> 1 with samba 4.3.7 works fine, 1 not.
>
>
>
> I saw Jelmer updated the samba to 4.3.8 in sid, so i recompiled these to jessie.
>
> I upgraded the 4.3.7 to 4.3.8
Hi Louis, debian 4.2.10 is the same as
2016 Apr 15
0
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
On 15/04/16 10:33, Oktay Akbal wrote:
> [global]
> workgroup = DOMAIN
> realm = DOMAIN.DE
> netbios name = HOST
> server string = HOST
> security = ADS
> encrypt passwords = Yes
> map to guest = Bad User
> password server = *
> log level = 3 vfs:0
> log file =
2016 Apr 15
0
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
On 15/04/16 12:05, Oktay Akbal wrote:
>>> I don't see where exactly the ways differ. I already played with idmap settings and keytab. It makes no difference.
>>> BTW the wiki entry does not explain how to create the keytab, so the setting is not really useful if you just follow that page.
>> With the 'old system' you just have one range, this is now depreciated
2002 Aug 13
2
AW: Unable to open configuration file "/etc/smb.conf" (or whereve r i specify)
Hi,
it looks like you have something really messed up on your system.
The size of the file is 1243 bytes (from strace) but 0 bytes are being read.
If you had no permission to read the strace would have looked like this:
open("/etc/samba/smb.conf", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 EACCES (Permission
denied)
A quick look at the source code reveals:
/etc/samba/smb.conf is opened in file_load
2003 Feb 21
1
PATCH: downloading drivers from Solaris [was Re: So SAMBA no longer ...]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Robert M. Martel wrote:
> I've followed the steps as listed in the manual. Log onto a
> windows 2000 client as a user listed as a printer admin. Load the
> printer driver and make the changes to reflect installed options on the
> printer. Just as listed in section 6.2.2 of the "how-to" manual
>
2002 Aug 13
2
AW: Unable to open configuration file "/etc/smb.conf"
Try these two:
bash> which testparam
should tell you which testparam is being started. Is it where you expect it
to be?
bash> strace /full/path/testparam
Gives you information on all system calls called from within testparam. It
will give quite a bit of output and somewhere near the end you will find
something like:
open("/usr/lib/smb.conf", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = ...
This would
2016 Apr 15
0
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
Ok, i have tested a bit more also.
Now i have this problem also on some other servers with D. Jessie.
The sernet 4.2.11 debian wheezy works fine as far i can see now.
All my member servers have these settings ( see below),.
Versies used are
4.1.17 (all ok) ( debian jessie packages )
4.2.20 (fail wbinfo -u) ( debian jessie packages )
4.2.11 (all ok) ( debian wheezy sernet packages )
4.3.6
2016 Apr 15
5
Domain member seems to work, wbinfo -u not
> > I don't see where exactly the ways differ. I already played with idmap settings and keytab. It makes no difference.
> > BTW the wiki entry does not explain how to create the keytab, so the setting is not really useful if you just follow that page.
>
> With the 'old system' you just have one range, this is now depreciated
> and you should use the new
2002 Aug 12
0
AW: AW: Samba tries to contact external IP ?
Hi Anreas,
I have problems interpreting the PIX output
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Andreas Moroder [mailto:andreas.moroder@sb-brixen.it]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. August 2002 07:56
> An: Uli Luckas
> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: [Samba] Samba tries to contact external IP ?
>
>
> Hello Uli,
>
> the packet are TCP. Our PIX does not
2002 Aug 13
0
AW: AW: Unable to open configuration file "/etc/smb.conf" (or whe reve r i specify)
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: nero one [mailto:nero_oner@yahoo.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. August 2002 19:33
> An: Uli Luckas
> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: Unable to open configuration file "/etc/smb.conf" (or
> whereve r i specify)
>
>
> Hi Uli,
>
> I'm not really sure what i'm looking for here, but
2007 May 08
2
TDB functionality document
Hi,
Does someone know a document which explains the TDB structure.
functionalites, and format of the TDB files etc.
I need to understand why some of the TDBs like messages.tdb, unexpected.tdb,
brlock if not read_only, locking.tdb, session.tdb, wins.tdb are called with
TDB_CLEAR_IF_FIRST tdb flags.
Why some TDBs are opend with O_RDWR|O_CREAT flags viz. gencache.tdb,
group_mapping.tdb,
2006 Apr 22
2
Re: TDB locking overhead and performance...
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:15:31PM +0100, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> As a test, I changed the opening of the locking.tdb and brlock.tdb
> files to use the TDB_INTERNAL flag, avoiding use of the fcntl(F_SETLK)
> syscall for locking individual database records. Performance was a lot
> snappier, with quite a bit less system time used.
>
> What is the scope of implementing shared