similar to: Moterboard help Please

All, First off I would like to say the book "The Official Samba-3 HowTO and Reference Guide" is awesome I purchased it off Amazon a couple of weeks ago. Ok now on to my problem. I have samba installed and configured and joined the domain no problem. When I run wbinfo -u I can see my domain users, when I run wbinfo -g I can see all my domain groups, BUT if I run

Hi, I am trying to get samba 3.0.7 working with our win2k DC. I installed samba from the ports collection, so the kerberos library looks to be the heimdel version. I can use kinit to create a ticket and it authenticates against the DC just fine. However when I attempt to use "net ads join" it fails with the following response: [2004/11/09 16:32:30, 0] utils/net_ads.c:ads_startup(183)

All I got my samba server to join my win2k domain without any problems. But if I change the config to read security=domain it prompts the user for a username and password. If I change it to security=server it does not prompt for user names. I did some searching in the list came up with a few emails and this website http://www.sugoi.org/bits/index.php?bit_id=10 but still no change. In the /etc/host

FreeBSD 4.10 Latest version of Samba Domain Member WinXP machines with SP2 Why do these errors continue to come up, it does not seem to be hurting a thing as the box is working perfectly no complaints other than these errors in my log file. Oct 14 16:07:00 ns1 smbd[82463]: getpeername failed. Error was Socket is not connected Oct 14 16:07:00 ns1 smbd[82463]: [2004/10/14 16:07:00, 0]

Hey this group uses exchange for the mailing list? This can't be true what is with all the virus warnings saying it came from exchange. But not only that it said it was deleted and that is not true when the mail reached me it still had the virus attached and my virus scanner deleted it. When these messages are sent to the group aren't they scanned before being sent to the list? Just

Can someone look at my config and let me know why my home drive might not be mapping everything else is working, also can someone point me to some docs to say exactly what the best practice is for setting permissions on the profiles share. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = DIGITALRAGE netbios name = HARRIER encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted =

All, I have been terribly pleased with openbsd 3.2 I was using it as a mail gateway with postifx on a pentium pro 200 with 1 gig of memory serving about 3800 users on the network. Well I wanted to add a larger harddrive than what I have in it now only 6.4 gig. Well the machine would not see it and for some reason after hours and hours of trying I can't get a tekram 395UW and a 18gig scsi to

All I will try to keep this short but I can't get any of my windows boxes to join the domain they include winXP, win2k, win9x. Server FreeBSD 4.5 Samba from Ports 2.2.2 Celery 400 with 512 meg of ram 120gig of Raid 5 U2W drives I added the machine names to samba in freebsd you must use vipw because there is no adduser plus it has a hard time with the $ at the end of the machine

I've been running samba servers with 200+ W98 machines for some time. I'm changing to W2k and everything was going fine. I've upgraded 40 boxes. One W2k box has started announcing itself as a local master browser for one of the workgroups. A samba server thinks it is master, forcing election. Samba will stop being the LMB for about 3 minutes and then will re-establish itself as

I have been pulling my hairs out about this for a while now. Running the latest version of SuSE with all patches applied, I have my machine joined to the domain no problem. But when I go to use mount -t smbfs I get this error. Mounting share failed, smbmnt must be installed suid root for direct user mounts (1000,1000) smbmnt failed:1 Of course I hit Google and the list archives first before

Hello All: I have a situation where I have a Samba box (RH 7.3 w/samba 2.2.4) that I set up for a client. Another consultant came along and installed a VPN using SonicWalls between the main site and a remote site. So now they want the remote users to save files on my Samba box. No problem except that the remote users can't see my local workgroup or any of the local machines. Here's

I can't seem to be able to mount any windows shares all I get is this error smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) a quick search on google leads me to believe it is broken, can anyone help me get this fixed?

I have seen a ton of messages on the list in the archives in reference to this but have not been able to find an answer to it. I will try to give as much info as possible so forgive me if this messages turns out to be long. Running FreeBSD 4.10 Samba 3.0.7 IBM e305 Server P4 2.0ghz 1gig of ECC Memory Boot Drive 40gig IDE Data Drive 250gig 8meg cache IDE 2 built in Gigabit Controllers

I'm building another server and must decide on scsi card the tekram looks very promising to me but need to know if it will be supported or not in 4.8 or 5.1. server will be used of mysql / apache. any info or suggestions as to scsi cards would be great. thx in advance. Sign, Eriq

Has anyone else seen this but I just came across this on google trying to research my problem. Hi, I've always found adding w2k workstations to a samba server a bit 'hit and miss'. A couple of things I did which helped around this problem when I had it: 1. Define root as a samba administrator 2. Created a user root (with same password) on the w2k machine - set as an

Good morning all and hope you all enjoyed the 4th. I have a FreeBSD box setup with Samba as a PDC for win9x win2k and winxp. Everything is working beautifully except for one thing, my win2k boxes and winxp boxes with profiles. Of course I had to have the profiles directory setup for win2k and xp clients to join the domain for some reason they were looking for that. Anyway on to the problem

We have some results that are somewhat entertaining and that relate to the size/speed discussion. The basic idea is exhaustive generation of C functions where "exhaustive" is qualified by some structural restrictions (depth of AST, node type, etc.). For one particular set of restrictions we ended up with about 7 million C functions. We then compiled each of these functions with 7

Hi, I've been trying to install Zimbra Desktop 7 on CentOS 5.5 using the usual perl script provided. The issue is, I get a warning that my system does not have ia32 libs. I dug a bit on google and found out that 'there is no such package as ia32 libs for Centos'. I also tried all the suggested work arounds like glibc & stuff, can anyone shed more light on this? Oh, the zimbra

So it would appear that llvm-gcc and clang are both slower than gcc4 which is infamous for being slow at compiling code, and yes this is with a release build/--enable-optimizations. This seems to go against notes such as http://clang.llvm.org/features.html#performance which claim clang is signifcantly faster than gcc. Below are some times and the larger object files when compiling an i386

Hi, i am using Savage Beast 2.3 plugin for the forum and i got and error undefined method `has_many'' for Object:Class C:/forum/vendor/plugins/savage-beast/lib/savage_beast/user_init.rb: 9:in `included'' C:/forum/vendor/plugins/savage-beast/lib/savage_beast/user_init.rb: 7:in `class_eval'' C:/forum/vendor/plugins/savage-beast/lib/savage_beast/user_init.rb: 7:in