similar to: Auth PPTP X SAMBA

Hi, after upgrading samba 3.0 from ~ Jan. 03 cvs -> today's cvs, samba crashes while contacting an LDAP server. If I try: $ smbclient -L localhost -Udariush%pass smbd logs the following: [2003/04/04 18:20:39, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_user(648) ldapsam_search_one_user: searching for:[(&(uid=dariush)(objectclass=sambaAccount))] [2003/04/04 18:20:39, 10]

Hello, I'm using samba 3.0.2(acl) and kernel 2.4.24+acl, libacl-2.2.23. Following problem: When I create a file in an directory with extended ACLs, samba applies the "create mask" in a wrong way (IMHO). The normal behaviour of tools like chmod is that the second (middle) permission field is mapped to the "mask" ACE if the file has an extended ACL, so that the change

Parameters are: Samba 2.2.7a PDC setup with LDAP includeing posix authentication for Linux. OK, the tutorial I've based my setup on is the Mandrake tutorial found at http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/ldap-auth.php Works great for autenticateing Linux from LDAP but it is really sparse on the Samba side of things. Esepcially when it comes to adding machine trust accounts. So anyway I

OK, here is the deal. My system spins like a top with one exception. I would like to store Computer accounts in ou=Computers and get them out of ou=People. I've tried simply makeing this the ou that Computers are added to but then the XP clients cannot seem to see them. Changeing this is likley to be easy to do and incredibly hard to find the specific details of how to do it. I know

Hi- I'm using Samba with OpenLDAP and was wondering how to add a user to multiple groups, for instance 'Domain Users' and 'Marketing'. Is this stored in the gid field? Do I just add more than one gid filed for each entry? Thanks! -Greg _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*

Hi, After some carefully editing of pdb_ldap.c I have managed to get a list of groups from the LDAP directory if you are root or anyother user. :-) The problem now is if you run the command (from win2k) net group it /domain (where 'it' is the group name) or try to open a group in user manager you do not get any listing of uers in that group. The error in windows is "Group name

Hi everybody ! I want to authenticate a Exchange 5.5 Server against Samba 2.2.8. But the Exchange Server says after using a Samba account: Cant start due to a logon failure: "The User has not been granted the request logon type at this computer" I tracked down the problem and i think that the "SeServiceLogonRight" Privilege is not set by the Samba PDC thus not allowing an

I?m facing some troubles with file / directory permissions... I log on the domain as admin user(root), and theres a pub share, on witch everyone needs to have permission to create / modify files, but when I change or create a file, only root can change the file, no one else. And then i need to go to server to chgrp users * -R and chown nobody * -R to allow others users to change the file.

Hi all, Before I setup an account with them, I'd like to hear other people's impression of LiveVoip. I'm considering using them for 800 numbers, and I'd like to feel comfortable that others here on the list have had good experiences with them. Thanks, sorry if this is the wrong list for this. :) Sena

Hi, Sorry to bother all of you this way, I see no other way at this point. I am trying to get a Siemens Masteguard working and found, by trial and error. Has anyone seen this before? I have the following info: 9600 BAUD 8 bits no parity 1 stop The commands look a lot like the SENA protocol except for the messaging format. It reacts as follows Sending ascii command:

I've been recently getting into Chilean wines and was looking for some recommendations. I tried two kinds (Sena 2007 and Sauvignon Blanc Single Vineyard 2010) and LOVED them. I'm probably going to try most others on PRZMan.com's top 10 list: http://przman.com/eat/top-ten-chilean-wines/ Any other suggestions?

On 21/04/15 16:06, Stefan Kania wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > The packages are online :-) > > Am 21.04.15 um 16:53 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: >> thats still the case with the packages but.. 4.2.1 wil build on >> jessie fine. ( from source ) Did that today. >> >> >> Gr, >> >> Louis >> >>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The packages are online :-) Am 21.04.15 um 16:53 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: > thats still the case with the packages but.. 4.2.1 wil build on > jessie fine. ( from source ) Did that today. > > > Gr, > > Louis > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the fourth release candidate of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. A release candidate implies that the code is very close to a final release, but remember that this is still a non-production snapshot intended for testing purposes. Use it at your own risk. The main issue addressed in this release

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team is proud to announce the availability of the fourth release candidate of the Samba 3.0.0 code base. A release candidate implies that the code is very close to a final release, but remember that this is still a non-production snapshot intended for testing purposes. Use it at your own risk. The main issue addressed in this release

Hi, does Samba-3.0.0beta3 still requires the posixAccount object for machine accounts? If so does Samba or any program called by Samba change the userPassword attribute for machine accounts? If no posixAccount object is required for machine accounts and there is a userPassword attribute from a differnt Object, does Samba or a program called by Samba change the userPassword attribute?

Hi, Is there any possibility that I can configure Samba to authenticate to a Radius server (FreeRadius)? I want to do accounting stuff to the Samba users. Tnx, Rogelio Dela Cruz

Hello, I have a rather experimental question to ask. I know that under standard circumstances, that you cannot have multiple PDC for a single domain, as they will conflict with each other. I am dealing with a case of a school district, where there are multiple buildings.There are T-1s that tie together each of the buildings, then a bonded T-1 grants access to the internet through the main admin

Hi All, Anyone else seeing this. Just updated to kernel 2.6.32-504.12.2.el6.x86_64 and pptp vpn (invoked via Gnome Network Manager) fails to connect. Boot up the previous 2.6.32-504.8.1.el6.x86_64 and pptp all good. OpenVPN is not affected. Anyone else seeing this. I have log file details if anyone wants those. Don't see it reported elsewhere. Thanks Ken -- This message has been

shorewall version 2.0.7 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,NOTRAILERS,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:30:48:53:25:b2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 81.169.188.152/32 brd 81.169.188.152 scope global eth0 3: eth1: