similar to: another oops, this time with 2.4.18-4

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "another oops, this time with 2.4.18-4"

2001 Dec 06
1
2.2.19: Assertion failure in ext3_new_block() at balloc.c line 709
Red Hat 2.2.19-6.2.12 + 0.0.7a + https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2001-November/002258.html (not tuned in /proc yet) + journal 4MB on each fs + 6 ext3 fs on raid1 (hda+hdc) + 1 ext3 fs on another disk not on raid1 (hdd) While untarring (tar zxf) a file that was on a ext3/raid1 onto hdd I got: ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.2.19-6.2.12.g1. Options used -V (default) -k
2002 Sep 25
0
PROBLEM:
Ext3 Journal oops & RAID-1 set losing sync. (Sent to both EXT3 and Linux-RAID since both are in use and seem possibly relevant) I have had a number of problems maintaining a software RAID-1 set on an IDE box I maintain; it seems that doing raidhotadd on the drive marked as invalid works each time though. However, I've had both errors about trying to read past the end of the
2001 Aug 02
0
ext3 0.0.7a Assertion
Hi, Doing the following I can generate an assertion in ext3 0.0.7a. I have an ext3 filesystem on /foo. I export /foo via nfs. I then mount via localhost:/foo onto /mnt. Start up a dd to generate a file on the nfs mount. (cd /mnt; dd if=/dev/zero of=./dd.out bs=1024k), then on the localhost filesystem /foo I rm the file. rm -f /foo/dd.out. This results in "ext3_free_inode: bit already
2001 Oct 05
1
Kernel Ooops probably in conjunction with lvm
Hello, I've got a rather strange setup over here with about 6 ext3 partitions, one 50gig lvm partition and one 2 gig software-raid1 partition running under a heavily patched 2.4.10 kernel (various netfilter patches, freeswan, current lvm patch (1.0.1-rc4 and current ext3 patch). Furthermore I have all of those neccessary filesystem tools, so don't tell me to upgrade :-) The machine was
2001 May 04
1
LVM 0.9.1beta7 and ext3 0.0.6b
Hi, I've recently been playing about with recent ext3 0.0.6b and lvm 0.9.1 beta7 and am now able to trigger an "Attempt to refile free buffer" assertion. This seems to "only" occur when using ext3 on the root filesystem. Possibly that is related to the fact that the lvm utility I'm using to reproduce this problem is modifying data in /etc. The easist reproduction
2002 Jan 21
2
Assertion Failure
I got this.. The system was usuable, but not very. If I tried to access the ext3 volume, it would hang. Reboot hung too, complaining about too many open files. Any ideas? I have no idea what triggered it; this is a big file/web/mail server, with all of that on the ext3 volume. And I've never run ksymoops before, but I think I did it right. - Josh Assertion failure in
2017 Dec 11
2
active/active failover
Dear all, I'm rather new to glusterfs but have some experience running lager lustre and beegfs installations. These filesystems provide active/active failover. Now, I discovered that I can also do this in glusterfs, although I didn't find detailed documentation about it. (I'm using glusterfs 3.10.8) So my question is: can I really use glusterfs to do failover in the way described
2003 Mar 20
0
[Bug 68] New: Kernel panic
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68 Summary: Kernel panic Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:
2017 Dec 11
0
active/active failover
Hi Stefan, I think what you propose will work, though you should test it thoroughly. I think more generally, "the GlusterFS way" would be to use 2-way replication instead of a distributed volume; then you can lose one of your servers without outage. And re-synchronize when it comes back up. Chances are if you weren't using the SAN volumes; you could have purchased two servers
2017 Dec 12
1
active/active failover
Hi Alex, Thank you for the quick reply! Yes, I'm aware that using ?plain? hardware with replication is more what GlusterFS is for. I cannot talk about prices where in detail, but for me, it evens more or less out. Moreover, I have more SAN that I'd rather re-use (because of Lustre) than buy new hardware. I'll test more to understand what precisely "replace-brick"
2001 Nov 05
2
oops on 2.4.14-pre8
Hello! I got oops after about 3 hours of uptime. Load was about 1,5. This is output of ksymoops after forced reboot if it helps someone. :-) ksymoops 2.4.0 on i686 2.4.14-pre8. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.14-pre8/ (default) -m /boot/System.map-2.4.14-pre8 (default) Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on
2006 Apr 18
4
Managed to make some progress, stuck again.
Hi, An update on my work to integrate my Linux server (CentOS 4.3) in AD 2003. Sorry about the long post :) Found this page (http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netos/article.php/3487081) and followed the instructions on it. First, I made sure that the Samba installation is supporting Kerberos, LDAP, AD and Windbind. That was OK. I made sure that /etc/hosts contain the name of the AD
2000 May 03
2
NT SMB Support parameter questions
Hi, I've recently had the following experience, which may be of help to people here, so I'm mentioning my tests and conclusions. I've recently been observing this behaviour from Samba - this is an easily reproducible problem:- 1/ Open a share 2/ Create a new document in Word. 3/ Make some changes. 4/ Save the document using the save icon on the toolbar, this works as expected. 5/
2003 Aug 31
4
linux-ha heartbeat .. failover firewall
I have searched your FAQ''s and read the documentation on your site as well as googling. I am not able to figure this out. If you have any ideas can you please help. I am using the linux-ha failover with redundant firewalls. As part of the function of the linux-ha software consists a service called heartbeat which is a connection from each failover node through a serial cable or ethernet.
2006 Mar 10
8
XML Databinding frameworks
Are there any XML databinding frameworks available for Ruby / Rails, such as Castor or JaXB for Java? Also are there framework such as Apache Axis for WebServices for Rails or Ruby? Regards, Harm de Laat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060310/3cf0cfd3/attachment.html
2012 Nov 12
3
Commercial features in Dovecot future: Object storage, archive
Hi all, Dovecot Oy?s web pages at www.dovecot.fi have been updated. The products page lists two features that will be available for commercial licensing, extending the functionality of the basic open-source version of Dovecot. * Storing emails to (high-latency) object storage, initially supporting Amazon S3, Caringo CAStor and Scality. * Email archive storage. See
2012 Nov 12
3
Commercial features in Dovecot future: Object storage, archive
Hi all, Dovecot Oy?s web pages at www.dovecot.fi have been updated. The products page lists two features that will be available for commercial licensing, extending the functionality of the basic open-source version of Dovecot. * Storing emails to (high-latency) object storage, initially supporting Amazon S3, Caringo CAStor and Scality. * Email archive storage. See
2016 Sep 02
2
Ayuda con gráfico típico de histograma más linea
Y bueno, algo más bonito sí que queda con ggplot... #--------------- datIn <- read.csv("pec.csv", header = TRUE, sep = ";", dec = ",") library(ggplot2) lab_x_idx <- c(1, round(nrow(datIn)/2, 0), nrow(datIn)) lab_x <- as.vector(datIn$hora[ lab_x_idx]) fre_gg <- ggplot( datIn, aes( x = 1:nrow(datIn), y = frec)) + geom_bar(stat =
2007 Aug 08
1
ACLs and winbind
I'm trying to allow XP clients to add ACLs in the homes share. It appears that I'm unable to do it unless I use winbind although I'm in a pure Samba/OpenLDAP environment. I have a PDC and BDC with Samba/OpenLDAP and a member Samba server with homes and profiles (below is its smb.conf) on which I have Posix ACLs. If I comment out the idmap lines I cannot add ACLs from XP in my home
2002 May 28
1
2.4.18rc2aa2 oops
Hi, just got this oops on one of my production servers (4way smp + highmem). Is it fixed in newer kernels or is it something new? Load is steadily growing and i cant even do a 'ps ax'... invalid operand: 0000 CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[<c0170396>] Not tainted Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386 EFLAGS: 00010282 eax: 0000001d ebx: 00000000 ecx: c02d5f88 edx: