similar to: (no subject)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "(no subject)"

2002 Jul 25
0
root filesystem problem
Noticed that I did not have a subject line in the previous message. Can the list moderator delete the previous message. ============================================================ Had two scsi hard drives. One went bad. The bad one had lilo in the MBR. Removed the drive. Then used the Mandrake install cd to boot into rescue mode. Was able to mount all filesystems within rescue mode on remaining
2002 Jun 27
2
(no subject)
hello, i just wanted to know how to move files from the master node to slave nodes...for example i have 10 files in the master and i want to move 2 files to each slave node...how do i do that....i have redhat7.2......i tried rpc but it said command not found...i am using a beowulf cluster. your's sincerely, devi vijay Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at
2001 Jan 18
2
root fs type in fstab
Hello all. I am currently using ext3 0.0.5d with great success. I am a bit conflicted about what to tell the system regarding my root filesystem however. I have my root filesystem configured and working as an ext3 filesystem, but it is/was not without some fraught. Using RedHat 7.0, if you simply create your journal on the root file- system, figure out it's inode number, issue a lilo -R
2016 Aug 08
0
centos 6.8 creates install to sde instead of sda
greetings one and all. when attempting to install centos 6.8 to an i386 mid tower, during setup of hard disk partitions, selection is for /dev/sde. if continued, after reboot, error is displayed after 'welcome to centos'. lines read: Checking filesystem fsck.ext4: no such file or directory while trying to open /dev/sda3 /dev/sda3: The superblock could not be read or does not describe a
2006 Jan 17
1
Mounting problem
Hi folks, For unknown cause I encounter following mounting problem; # /mnt/hda8 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda8, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so # dmesg | tail via82cxxx: timeout while reading AC97 codec (0x9A0000) via82cxxx: timeout while reading AC97 codec (0x9A0000)
2020 May 28
2
Recover from an fsck failure
This is CentOS-6x. I have cloned the HDD of a CentOS-6 system. I booted a host with that drive and received the following error: checking filesystems /dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_root: clean, 128491/4096000 files, 1554114/16304000 blocks /dev/sda1: clean, 47/120016 files, 80115/512000 blocks /dev/mapper/vg_voinet01-lv_home: clean, 7429/204800 files, 90039/819200 blocks
2001 May 11
1
ext3 filesystem lost.
Hello. We have, over the last few months, lost ext3 filesystems three times. The whole filesystem left unusable. nfs-server:~# mount /dev/rd/c0d1p1 /mnt -t ext3 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/rd/c0d1p1, or too many mounted file systems (in dmesg) EXT3-fs: journal inode is deleted. EXT3-fs: get root inode failed nfs-server:~# fsck /dev/rd/c0d1p1 Parallelizing
2017 Mar 18
1
Centos-6.8 fsck and lvms
I have a CentOS-6.8 system which has a suspected HHD failure. I have booted it into rescue mode from a CentOS-6.5 minimal install CD in order to run fsck -c on it. The system hosts several vms. I have activated the lvs associated with these vm using pvscan -s ; vgscan ; vgchange -ay. An lvscan shows the lvs as ACTIVE. None are mounted. When I try to run fsck on any of them I see the
2006 Nov 01
1
e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block
I posted this to the Fedora-list, but thought I might get some additional information here as well. I have a HD that refuses to mount with a 'bad magic number in super-block'. I'm running FedoraCore 6 x86_64. [root at moe ~]# fdisk -l /dev/hdc Disk /dev/hdc: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
2012 Jan 30
2
One of my servers wont boot today
Hi All, One of my servers upon a restart today comes up with an error checking filesystems: fsck.ext3: no such file or directory while trying to open /dev/VolGroup-1/Logvol00. /dev/VolGroup-1/LogVol00. The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2 filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2 filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then
2006 Nov 16
2
ext3 corrupted
Hi there, For years I've been using the ext3 file system without to think that it can ever gets broken so bad. This was until last week when a box that I have running Linux from a SanDisk CF went down. Since then I am struggling with this CF trying to understand what is happening. The CF is SanDisk ultra II 1GB. On this I have 4 partitions all of them with ext3: boot / swap
2006 Sep 02
0
CentOS 4.4 LILO Raid (also e2fsprogs in general)
i noticed that the 4.4 upgrade broke LILO on Raid... it gave errors on partitions not on the primary disk along the lines of "/dev/dis: no such device"... even explicitly installing the boot sector on each device in the array, while it allowed the system to boot, gave errors at boot time and did not display the CentOS boot screen anymore... i solved the problem by creating a
2006 Apr 15
1
Partition not recognized by mount
Hi, somehow after a power failure i can't mount my ext3 partition :( mount /dev/hdd2 /mnt/gentoo/ mount: you must specify the filesystem type fdisk /dev/hdd The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 484521. There is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024, and could in certain setups cause problems with: 1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., old versions of LILO) 2)
2010 May 28
1
Multi-partition domain not recognizing extra partitions
Hello, I have been having an annoying problem with a multi-partition domain. This domain has a separate partition for : /, /home, /usr, /var, /tmp and /data. I created it using xen-tools and the custom partitionning scheme option. The partitions are inside a LVM. When I boot the domain, it mounts the / and swap partition but none of the others. Therefore it doesn''t work... I get the
2007 Sep 20
8
How are alternate superblocks repaired?
Hi, Using dumpe2fs I have been able to determine that all of my alternate ext3 superblocks are corrupted (not clean), and only the primary superblock is valid, i.e. mount works and the ordered journal is applied. When the primary superblock gets flakey, i.e. the ext_attr Filesystem feature goes missing - not sure why this occurs. At this point, the mount does not apply the journal using the
2001 Oct 26
1
ext3 kernel 2.4.13
Hello everyone, I'm new to the list and I hope I'm not repeating something that was already asked for. I had been using the stock kernel that came with Mandrake 8.1 which is kernel 2.4.8-26mdk (not sure what things are applied to a stock 2.4.8) I have my root partition /dev/hda1 on ext3 Mandrake took care of all this, by putting the ext3 module in initrd. I just dl'ed 2.4.13
2011 Mar 08
3
[Newbie] Reclaiming /boot space
When trying to do a yum update, I am told I need more space in /boot. When I check the contents of /boot (ls -l /boot), there are no files. If I do a df -h, there is no available space yet it shows that it has a lot of used space. The fstab shows the following: # This file is edited by fstab-sync - see 'man fstab-sync' for details /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 /
2014 Sep 21
1
Re: Possible bug in mkfs.ext3
On 09/20/2014 12:07 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:56 PM, jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member. >> >> This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run. >> >> I am reporting this per
2006 Sep 26
3
EXT3-fs: invalid journal inode.
Hi Everyone, I have a server which has a raid array on /dev/sdb. After a crash I tried to mount the array and it failed with: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb, missing codepage or other error dmesg reports: EXT3-fs: invalid journal inode. I tried to run e2fsck and it failed (The output can be seen below). If anyone has any suggestions on how I can restore
2009 Jul 21
6
Troubles converting a pv host from dom0-hosted kernel to self-contained kernel
Hello list. I have a perfectly working PV host, with this configuration: kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-3.3.0-7mdv" ramdisk = "/boot/initrd-2.6.18.8-xen-3.3.0-7mdv.img" root = "/dev/sda1 ro" extra = "(hd0)/boot/grub/menu.lst" memory = 256 maxmem = 512 name = "sexonthebeach" uuid = "f36962f5-0dec-4708-84a0-f5b4dea48d34" disk = [