similar to: Samba machine trust account setting in FreeBSD

Hello, I am wondering if anyone could help me out with the following questions: 1. How to uninstall Samba? 2. How to install/upgrade/uninstall Samba from Mandrake 9.0 to the latest Samba version via source code (I noticed that MDK9 installed Samba to different places. And the document:"Using Samba" mentioned the file "inetd.conf" but I couldn't find it in MDK9.)

Hello All! I am trying to follow the instructions to store Samba's Uer/Machine Account information in an LDAP Directory (Samba-LDAP-HOWTO.html). Is there anyone knowing how to run this Perl script: "import_smbpasswd.pl" in examples/LDAP directory? I don't know Perl. :( In addition, is there more information/tutorial of LDAP available on line? Thank you very much.

Hello, I am trying to use Samba (2.2.7a)+ LDAP (2.0.25) as PDC on FreeBSD 4.7. But it turned out that LDAP is not easy-going!!! Without LDAP, things seems fine. I can join the Win2000 machine accounts and the shares are all right. However, when configurating samba with ldap support, then smbpasswd couldn't work anymore. I can only use # smbpasswd -w secretpassword to add the

Hello=20all, =20=20I=20am=20wondering=20if=20anyone=20successfully=20built=20samba=20PDC=20= on mahine=20A=20and=20used=20LDAP=20on=20machine=20B=20for=20authentication? =20=20Because=20now=20before=20creating=20a=20samba=20account,=20one=20must create=20an=20unit=20account,=20right? =20=20My=20goal=20is=20as=20follows:

Hello all, This message is simple instructions to install Samba + OpenLDAP on FreeBSD (4.7). Hope it would help someone. 1. To keep ports update, better install cvsupit in the beginning mis3# cd /usr/ports/net/cvsupit mis3# make install clean Reference: FreeBSD Unleashed (by Urban and Tiemann), p. 425 2. To use Samba + OpenLDAP with the option "ldap ssl =

----- Forwarded message from Yihua Philip Sheng <phsan@cs.siu.edu> ----- From: "Yihua Philip Sheng" <phsan@cs.siu.edu> Subject: Compiling error Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:49:45 -0600 To: <samba-binaries-admin@lists.samba.org> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=0.9.1.2 When I tried to compile the

Hi Sheng Am Dienstag, 4. März 2008 schrieb Zhou Sheng: > Current llvm-gcc 4.2 building failed on X86-64, here is the dump I am not followng head closely but may it be that the current head still doesn't support amd64 proper: gcc README.LLVM: "When targeting non-darwin X86-64/AMD-64/EM64-T, configure with --disable-shared. The LLVM X86-64 backend doesn't support PIC codegen on

Current llvm-gcc 4.2 building failed on X86-64, here is the dump information: xgcc -B/home/zsth/projects/llvm.org/build/cfe4.2obj/./prev-gcc/ -B/home/zsth/projects/llvm.org/install/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -I../../../cfe4.2/libcpp -I. -I../../../cfe4.2/libcpp/../include -I../../../cfe4.2/libcpp/include -DENABLE_LLVM -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Weihua Sheng <weihua.sheng at gmail.com> wrote: > I actullay would expect the more accurate results from applying > anders-aa, but I could not interpret what has been returned - at least > I should see something like jj->aa, right? I'm not quite following... jj and aa don't alias; both versions show that. The results returned for

Hi Eli, thanks for the answers helping out. I tried to understand further - got another example: void test() { int *jj, *kk; int aa = 100; jj = &aa; *jj = 300; kk = jj; *kk = 400; } int main() { test(); return 0; } bc looks like the following (only test() part) define void @test() nounwind { entry: %aa = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2] %kk =

These patches better implement ArtProvider and add the demo for it. I also expanded the bigdemo window a little bit. I really think we should go larger but I suppose there might be some people at 800x600 still. Note that creating your own art provider still doesn''t quite work correctly. I didn''t have time to get into that. The RubyConstants.i.patch file looks weird. Not

This looks wrong to me, though the x86 backend produces code that does the right thing (reads each element once). If you change the code (see below) to read each element twice, llvm-gcc still does the right thing but llvm-g++ does not (i.e. it fails to read aech location twice). Current versions of gcc/g++ also look wrong. All 4 compilers (gcc,g++,llvm-gcc,llvm-g++) do the right thing when

Hi, Thanks, John, I just forgot the multi-thread issue. I'll write my own pass to handle this as for my project, it is just single-thread case. Sheng. Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 09:30:45 -0500 > From: John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Eliminate Store-Load pair even the LoadInst is > volatile > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List

Hi Keir The latest (hybrid) patchset again... Change from v4: 1. Add support for PV clocksource on HVM. (Replace evtchn enabling with pv clock enabling). 2. Update the patch following Tim''s comments. Change from v3: 1. Minor polish the patchset. Replace several specific is_hvm_pv_evtchn_domain() judgement. 2. Name changed... Change from v2: 1. Change the name "hybrid"

Dear All, Sorry if this question has been posted before but there's no enough answer to solved my problem and I'm going crazy because of it....:( I'm currently installed Samba-2.2.8a as logon server on My FreeBSD 5.0. For Win 9.X client there's no problem at all. But when I tried to joining W2K client into samba domain it's shown an error message such as : "the

Hi Keir The latest (hybrid) patchset again... Change from v5: Address the comments from Tim. Change from v4: 1. Add support for PV clocksource on HVM. (Replace evtchn enabling with pv clock enabling). 2. Update the patch following Tim''s comments. Change from v3: 1. Minor polish the patchset. Replace several specific is_hvm_pv_evtchn_domain() judgement. 2. Name changed...

Hi I am completely new to LLVM, and I am trying to explore the alias analysis part of it. It seems to me that -basicaa is the most simple alias analysis pass in LLVM. So I would like to try and make it work (to see some alias analysis results of some sample bit code). What I have done is that I ---make lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp into a .so file ---write a sample c program, hello.c,

Hi, I encountered a problem about volatile quantifier when using llvm-gcc, here is the example: #define N 10 int sum(volatile int a[N]) { int sum = 0; unsigned i = 0; for (i = 0; i < N; ++i) sum += a[i]; return sum; } If I compile it as C code, then llvm-gcc will dump: define i32 @sum(i32* nocapture %a) nounwind { bb1.thread: %0 = volatile load i32* %a, align 4

Hi, Here is C function: uint64_t mul(uint32_t x, uint32_t y) { return x * y; } current llvm-gcc-4.0 with -O3 will compile it to: define i64 @mul(i32 %x, i32 %y) nounwind { entry: %tmp3 = mul i32 %y, %x ; <i32> [#uses=1] %tmp34 = zext i32 %tmp3 to i64 ; <i64> [#uses=1] ret i64 %tmp34 } This seems incorrect. I think it should extend %x, %y to i64 first and

Three kind of structures need to be freed on close: * All struct btrfs_device managed by fs_devices * The name field for each struct btrfs_device * The above items for seed_devices Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com> --- volumes.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c index