similar to: Virus in message

All, First off I would like to say the book "The Official Samba-3 HowTO and Reference Guide" is awesome I purchased it off Amazon a couple of weeks ago. Ok now on to my problem. I have samba installed and configured and joined the domain no problem. When I run wbinfo -u I can see my domain users, when I run wbinfo -g I can see all my domain groups, BUT if I run

Hi, I am trying to get samba 3.0.7 working with our win2k DC. I installed samba from the ports collection, so the kerberos library looks to be the heimdel version. I can use kinit to create a ticket and it authenticates against the DC just fine. However when I attempt to use "net ads join" it fails with the following response: [2004/11/09 16:32:30, 0] utils/net_ads.c:ads_startup(183)

FreeBSD 4.10 Latest version of Samba Domain Member WinXP machines with SP2 Why do these errors continue to come up, it does not seem to be hurting a thing as the box is working perfectly no complaints other than these errors in my log file. Oct 14 16:07:00 ns1 smbd[82463]: getpeername failed. Error was Socket is not connected Oct 14 16:07:00 ns1 smbd[82463]: [2004/10/14 16:07:00, 0]

All, I have been terribly pleased with openbsd 3.2 I was using it as a mail/samba server with postifx on a pentium pro 200 with 1 gig of memory. Well I wanted to add a larger harddrive than what I have in it now only 6.4 gig. Well the machine would not see it and for some reason after hours and hours of trying I can't get a tekram 395UW and a 18gig scsi to be the boot drive and having failed

I have been pulling my hairs out about this for a while now. Running the latest version of SuSE with all patches applied, I have my machine joined to the domain no problem. But when I go to use mount -t smbfs I get this error. Mounting share failed, smbmnt must be installed suid root for direct user mounts (1000,1000) smbmnt failed:1 Of course I hit Google and the list archives first before

All I will try to keep this short but I can't get any of my windows boxes to join the domain they include winXP, win2k, win9x. Server FreeBSD 4.5 Samba from Ports 2.2.2 Celery 400 with 512 meg of ram 120gig of Raid 5 U2W drives I added the machine names to samba in freebsd you must use vipw because there is no adduser plus it has a hard time with the $ at the end of the machine

All I got my samba server to join my win2k domain without any problems. But if I change the config to read security=domain it prompts the user for a username and password. If I change it to security=server it does not prompt for user names. I did some searching in the list came up with a few emails and this website http://www.sugoi.org/bits/index.php?bit_id=10 but still no change. In the /etc/host

Can someone look at my config and let me know why my home drive might not be mapping everything else is working, also can someone point me to some docs to say exactly what the best practice is for setting permissions on the profiles share. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = DIGITALRAGE netbios name = HARRIER encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted =

I've been running samba servers with 200+ W98 machines for some time. I'm changing to W2k and everything was going fine. I've upgraded 40 boxes. One W2k box has started announcing itself as a local master browser for one of the workgroups. A samba server thinks it is master, forcing election. Samba will stop being the LMB for about 3 minutes and then will re-establish itself as

I have previously gotten samba 3.0.4 to work with the MIT implementation, now with 3.0.7, the configure is looking for -lgssapi and not finding it. I can get the AD to issue me a kerberos ticket, samba is just complaining about not geing able to find the gssapi library. Does anyone have a tried-and-true approach using the ports system? Thanks, Graham

Hello All: I have a situation where I have a Samba box (RH 7.3 w/samba 2.2.4) that I set up for a client. Another consultant came along and installed a VPN using SonicWalls between the main site and a remote site. So now they want the remote users to save files on my Samba box. No problem except that the remote users can't see my local workgroup or any of the local machines. Here's

I can't seem to be able to mount any windows shares all I get is this error smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) a quick search on google leads me to believe it is broken, can anyone help me get this fixed?

Tested it in two different environments lately with exactly same results. Was trying to get better read performance from local mounts with hundreds of thousands maildir email files by using SSD, hoping that .gluster file stat read will improve which does migrate to hot tire. After seeing what you described for 24 hours and confirming all move around on the tires is done - killed it. Here are my

I have seen a ton of messages on the list in the archives in reference to this but have not been able to find an answer to it. I will try to give as much info as possible so forgive me if this messages turns out to be long. Running FreeBSD 4.10 Samba 3.0.7 IBM e305 Server P4 2.0ghz 1gig of ECC Memory Boot Drive 40gig IDE Data Drive 250gig 8meg cache IDE 2 built in Gigabit Controllers

This problem appears to be related to the sqlite3 DB files that are used for the tiering file access counters, stored on each hot and cold tier brick in .glusterfs/<volname>.db. When the tier is first created, these DB files do not exist, they are created, and everything works fine. On a stop/start or service restart, the .db files are already present, albeit empty since I don't have

I am fighting this issue: Bug 1540376 ? Tiered volume performance degrades badly after a volume stop/start or system restart. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540376 Does anyone have any ideas on what might be causing this, and what a fix or work-around might be? Thanks! ~ Jeff Byers ~ Tiered volume performance degrades badly after a volume stop/start or system restart. The

Has anyone else seen this but I just came across this on google trying to research my problem. Hi, I've always found adding w2k workstations to a samba server a bit 'hit and miss'. A couple of things I did which helped around this problem when I had it: 1. Define root as a samba administrator 2. Created a user root (with same password) on the w2k machine - set as an

Good morning all and hope you all enjoyed the 4th. I have a FreeBSD box setup with Samba as a PDC for win9x win2k and winxp. Everything is working beautifully except for one thing, my win2k boxes and winxp boxes with profiles. Of course I had to have the profiles directory setup for win2k and xp clients to join the domain for some reason they were looking for that. Anyway on to the problem

Hi, I've been trying to install Zimbra Desktop 7 on CentOS 5.5 using the usual perl script provided. The issue is, I get a warning that my system does not have ia32 libs. I dug a bit on google and found out that 'there is no such package as ia32 libs for Centos'. I also tried all the suggested work arounds like glibc & stuff, can anyone shed more light on this? Oh, the zimbra

Does anyone have any ideas about how to fix, or to work-around the following issue? Thanks! Bug 1549714 - On sharded tiered volume, only first shard of new file goes on hot tier. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549714 On sharded tiered volume, only first shard of new file goes on hot tier. On a sharded tiered volume, only the first shard of a new file goes on the hot tier, the rest